PUZZLINGUISTICS: A TYPOLOGY OF LUDIC LANGUAGE BASED CLUES FOR IN-GAME PUZZLES IN ROLE-PLAYING GAMES
PDF

Keywords

ludic language
puzzle
clues
role-playing games
user functions

How to Cite

Purnama, S. L. S., Nababan, M., Santosa, R., & Purnomo, S. L. A. (2024). PUZZLINGUISTICS: A TYPOLOGY OF LUDIC LANGUAGE BASED CLUES FOR IN-GAME PUZZLES IN ROLE-PLAYING GAMES. Issues in Language Studies, 13(2), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.6463.2024

Abstract

Hundreds of role-playing video games have been produced since the creation of the first title of the genre, Dungeons and Dragons, in 1974. These titles incorporate one common feature in the genre, puzzle. In designing a puzzle which primarily revolves around its major element which is clue design, language contributes to the playfulness and playability of the game itself. This study attempts to explore the roles of ludic language in designing clues with regards to the user’s functions of the games. The study employed Crystal’s ludic language, Danesi’s puzzling language, Caillois’ ludus theory, Huizinga’s play function, and Aarseth’s user functions on twenty-three role playing video games or commonly abbreviated as RPGs and their sub-genres. The study further proposes a typology of clues. This typology comprises clues which are orbital, conditional, collocative, referential, indicative, reflective, reversal, and signalling. Game developers could employ the results of this study as a consideration in designing puzzles in video games especially role-playing video game genres.

https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.6463.2024
PDF

References

Aarseth, E. J. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on ergodic literature. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Anable, A. (2018). Playing with feelings: Video games and affect. University of Minnesota Press.

Avinash, M. R. (2016). Use of puzzle solving games to teach English. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(15). 1-5 https://dx.doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i15/86940

Barton, M., & Stacks, S. (2019). Dungeons and desktops: The history of computer role-playing games (2nd ed.). CRC Press.

Caillois, R. (2001). Man, play, and games. University of Illinois Press.

Crystal, D. (1998). Language play. University of Chicago Press.

Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., & Nakamura, J. (2014). Flow. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), Flow and the foundations of positive psychology: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (pp. 227-238). Springer.

Danesi, M. (2002). The puzzle instinct: The meaning of puzzles in human life. Indiana University Press.

Fernández-Vara, C. (2011, January). Game spaces speak volumes: Indexical storytelling. In Proceedings of 2011 DiGRA International Conference: Think Design Play.

Fjellestad, D. (2021). The ludic impulse in post-postmodern fiction. In M. Enomoto & M. K. Gold (Eds.), Ludics: Play as humanistic inquiry (pp. 293-315). Palgrave Macmillan.

Gorniak, P., & Roy, D. (2005, October). Probabilistic grounding of situated speech using plan recognition and reference resolution. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (pp. 138-143).

Hasan-Rokem, G., & Shulman, D. D. (Eds.). (1996). Untying the knot: On riddles and other enigmatic modes. Oxford University Press.

Howard, J. (2022). Quests: Design, theory, and history in games and narratives. CRC Press.

Huizinga, J. (2014). Homo ludens. Routledge.

Levine, S. C., Ratliff, K. R., Huttenlocher, J., & Cannon, J. (2012). Early puzzle play: A predictor of preschoolers' spatial transformation skill. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 530-542. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0025913

Liang, M. Y. (2012). Foreign ludicity in online role-playing games. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(5), 455-473. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.619988

Lindley, C. A. (2004, September). Ludic engagement and immersion as a generic paradigm for human-computer interaction design. In International Conference on Entertainment Computing (pp. 3–13). Springer.

McMahon, K., Sparrow, B., Chatman, L., & Riddle, T. (2011). Driven to distraction: The impact of distracter type on unconscious decision making. Social Cognition, 29(6), 683-698.

Nelson, R. A., & Strachan, I. (2009). Action and puzzle video games prime different speed/accuracy tradeoffs. Perception, 38(11), 1678-1687. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1521/soco.2011.29.6.683

Nguyen, T. H. D., El-Nasr, M. S., & Canossa, A. (2021). Glyph: Visualization tool for understanding problem-solving strategies in puzzle games. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.13742. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.13742

Oei, A. C., & Patterson, M. D. (2014). Playing a puzzle video game with changing requirements improves executive functions. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 216–228. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.046

O'Rourke, E., Ballweber, C., & Popović, Z. (2014). Hint systems may negatively impact performance in educational games. In Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale Conference (pp. 51-60). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566248

Schell, J. (2008). The art of game design: A book of lenses. CRC Press.

Shokeen, E., Pellicone, A., Weintrop, D., Ketelhut, D. J., Williams-Pierce, C., Plane, J. D., & Cukier, M. (2020). Designing failure and feedback within puzzles. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 370-374). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383668.3419901

Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant observation. Waveland Press.

Pagis, D. (1996). Toward a theory of the literary riddle. In G. Hasan-Rokem & D. D. Shulman (Eds.), Untying the knot: On riddles and other enigmatic modes (pp. 81–108). Oxford University Press.

Prakoso, M. R., Yanuasari, R. A., Purnama, S. L. S., & Prihastiwi, L. (2023). Pygmalionization: Do action figures, Nendoroids, and plushies of films and games tell a story? Crossover, 3(1), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.22515/crossover.v3i1.7063

Purnomo, S. F. L. A. (2019). Narrative junction: Revisiting design approach for role-playing video games from the perspectives of cognitive linguistics. In Fantasylicious: Fantasy in the perspectives of language & literature (pp. 76-111). Gerbang Media Aksara

Purnomo, S. L. A., & Khristianto, K. (2019). Proposing a gaming language analysis procedure to reveal video game ideology through ludic linguistics. Register Journal, 12(2), 235-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v12i2.235-261

Pusey, M., Wong, K. W., & Rappa, N. A. (2021). The puzzle challenge analysis tool: A tool for analysing the cognitive challenge level of puzzles in video games. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CHI PLAY), 1-27. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3474703

Wauck, H., & Fu, W. T. (2017). A data-driven, multidimensional approach to hint design in video games. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 137-147). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025171.3025224

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 UNIMAS Publisher