The Effect of Board Governance and CEO Attributes Towards Corporate Performance of Malaysian Public Listed Financial Companies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/uraf.2788.2020Abstract
This paper investigates the relationship between corporate governance, CEO attributes and firm performance of public listed financial companies in Malaysia from 2008 to 2017. There are several theories employed in the studies whereby the agency theory and resource dependency theory suggest that the board size have a positive impact on firm performance. In contrast, stewardship theory suggests smaller board size positively impacts the firm performance and prospect theory suggested that every person perceives and values gains and losses differently, and this affects the decision making. The firm performance has been measured using the return on equity (ROE) and return on assets (ROA). The data of the variables of board size, board independence, board meeting, CEO duality, CEO age and CEO gender are manually obtained from the annual reports, while the financial data include firm performance, capital expenditure and leverage are obtained from the Thomson Reuters Datastream. The research method employed in this study is the panel regression analysis. The findings of this study suggest that there is a positive and significant relationship between board size and firm performance and a positive and significant relationship between board independence and firm performance. Meanwhile, board meeting is found to have mix relationship with the firm performance. Furthermore, our result also shows CEO age and male CEO exhibit positive impact on firm performance.
References
Abid, G., Khan, B., Rafiq, Z., & Alia, A. (2014). Theoretical perspective of corporate governance. Bulletin of Business and Economics, 3(4), 166-175.
Afza, T., & Nazir, M. S. (2014). Theoretical perspective of corporate governance: a review. European Journal of Scientific Research, 119(2), 255-264.
Altuwaijri, B., & Kalyanaraman, L. (2016). Is 'excess' board independence good for firm performance? An empirical investigation of non-financial listed firms in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Financial Research, 7(2), Retrieved from http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijfr/article/view/9084
https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v7n2p84
Amran, N. A., Yusof, M. A. M., & Aripin, R. I. N. (2014). Do characteristics of CEO and chairman influence government linked companies performance? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 799-803.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.546
Appiah, K. O. (2017). The impact of corporate board size on firm performance: Evidence from Ghana and Nigeria. Research in Business and Management, 4(2), 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.5296/rbm.v4i2.11721
Bank Negara Malaysia. (2009). Governor's Keynote Address at the Financial Industry Conference 2009. Retrieved from http://www.bnm.gov.my/index.php?ch=en_speech&pg=en_speech&ac=333&lang=e
Bouckova, M. (2015). Management accounting and agency theory. Procedia Economics and Finance, 25, 5-13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00707-8
Chou, H., Chung, H., & Yin, X. (2012). Attendance of board meetings and company performance: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37, 4157-4171.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.07.028
Duru, A., Iyenger, R. J., & Zampelli, E. M. (2016). The dynamic relationship between CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating role of board independence. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4269-4277.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.001
Eduardo, M., & Poole, B. (2016). CEO age and gender: Subsequent market performance. Cogent Business & Management, 3(1), 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2016.1146389
Fuzi, S. F. S., Halim, S. A. A., & Julizaerma, M. K. (2016). Board independence and firm performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 460-465.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30152-6
Guest, P. (2009). The impact of board size on firm performance: evidence from the UK. The European Journal of Finance, 15(4), 385-404.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13518470802466121
Hawas, A., & Tse, C. B. (2016). How corporate governance affects investment decisions of major shareholders in UK listed companies: Has the recent credit crunch changed the game? Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 3(1), 100-133.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X15590226
Ilyukhin, E. (2015). The impact of financial leverage on firm performance: Evidence from Russia. Корпоративные финансы, 2(34). 24-36.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2589013
Inam, A., & Mir, G. M. (2014). The impact of financial leverage on firm performance in fuel and energy sector, Pakistan. European Journal of the Business and Management, 6(37), 339-347.
Jaisinghani, D., Tandon, D., & Batra, D. K. (2018). Capital expenditure and persistence of firm performance: an empirical study for the Indian automobiles industry. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 16(1). Retrieved from https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1504/IJICBM.2018.088595
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICBM.2018.088595
Jalbert, T., Jalbert, M., & Furumo, K. (2013). The relationship between CEO gender, financial performance and financial management. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 11(1), 25-33.
https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v11i1.7520
Junior, S. D. S., & Luciano, E. M. (2016). Prospect theory and the risks involved in decision-making: Content analysis in proquest articles. Future Journal, 8(1), 60-87.
https://doi.org/10.7444/future.v8i1.224
Kalsie, A., & Shrivastav, S. M. (2016). The relationship between CEO duality and firm performance: An analysis using panel data approach. IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 15(2), 37-58.
Khan, W. A., & Vieito, J. P. (2013). CEO gender and firm performance. Journal of Economics and Business, 67, 55-66.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2013.01.003
Kutum, I. (2015). Board Characteristics and firm performance: Evidence from Palestine. European Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance Research, 3(3), 32-47.
Lam, T. Y., & Lee, S. K. (2007). CEO duality and firm performance: evidence from Hong Kong. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 8(3), 299-316.
https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700810879187
Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). "A modest proposal for improved corporate governance". The Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59-77.
Liu, Y., Miletkov, M. K., Wei, Z., & Yang, T. (2015). Board independence and firm performance in China. Journal of Corporate Finance,30, 223-244.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.12.004
Namazi, M. (2013). Role of the agency theory in implementing management's control. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 5(2), 38-47.
https://doi.org/10.5897/JAT11.032
Ntim, C.G., & Oseit, K.A. (2011). The impact of corporate board meetings on corporate performance in South Africa. African Review of Economics and Finance, 2(2), 83-103.
Nulla, Y. M. (2014). The effect of CEO Age on CEO Compensation using accounting performance as a benchmark: An empirical study on NYSE index companies. Journal of Management Policies and Practices, 2(1), 119-133.
Ong, T. S., Soh, W. N., Teh, B. H., & Ng, S. H. (2014). Corporate governance and its effect on the efficiency of generating financial performance: Evidence from the oil and gas industry of Malaysia. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 9(2), 19-36.
Palaniappan, G. (2017). Determinants of corporate financial performance relating to board characteristics of corporate governance in Indian manufacturing industry: An empirical study. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 26(1), 67-85.
https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-07-2017-005
Peni, E. (2012). CEO and Chairperson characteristics and firm performance. Journal of Management & Governance, 18(1), 185-205.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-012-9224-7
Purag, M. B., Abdullah, A. B., & Bujang, I. (2016). Corporate governance and capital structure of Malaysian family-owned companies. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 11(1), 18-30.
Ramirez, B., & Pooittiwong, A. (2016, January 6). ASEAN economic integration: opportunities and challenges that lie ahead. International Policy Digest. Retrieved from https://intpolicydigest.org/2016/01/06/asean-economic-integration-opportunities-and-challenges-that-lie-ahead/
Rashid, A. (2010). CEO duality and firm performance: Evidence from a developing country. Corporate Ownership and Control, 8(1), 163-175.
https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i1c1p1
Rashid, A. (2017). Board independence and firm performance: Evidence from Bangladesh. Future Business Journal, 4(1), 34-49.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2017.11.003
Roy, A. (2016). Corporate governance and firm performance: A study of Indian listed firms. Journal of Management Research, 31-46.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0972622516629032
Subramaniam, R., & Susela, D. S. (2011). Corporate governance and dividend policy in Malaysia. International Conference on Business and Economics Research, 1, 200-207.
Taipi, E., & Ballkoci, V. (2017). Capital expenditure and firm performance evidence from Albanian construction sector. European Scientific Journal, 13(28). Retrieved from https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/10055
https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n28p231
Ujunwa, A., Salami, P. O., & Umar, A. H. (2013). CEO duality and firm performance: An integration of institutional perceptive with agency theory. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, 7(1), 180-186.
Varga, D. (2017). Fintech, the new era of financial services. Studies and Articles, 11, 22-32.
https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2017.11.03
Williams, M.N., Grajales, C.A.G., & Kurkiewicz, D. (2013). Assumptions of multiple regression: Correcting two misconceptions. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18(11), 1-14.
Wu, X., & Li, H. (2015). Board independence and the quality of board monitoring: Evidence from China. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 11(3), 308-328.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-07-2014-0101
Zulkafli, A. H., & Hamzah, A. H. (2014). Board governance and corporate financial policy. Journal of Emerging Issues in Economics, Finance and Banking, 3(4), 1168-1184.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
