Examining student engagement in online ideological and political learning within vocational colleges in China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.9051.2025Keywords:
ideological and political education, online learning engagement, higher vocational colleges, activity theory, social interactionAbstract
This study examines student engagement in online ideological and political (I&P) courses at higher vocational institutions during the pandemic's shift to online education. Recognising limited research on engagement in such politically charged remote learning contexts, the study investigates institutional, technological, and pedagogical drivers (RQ1) and grade-level variations in interaction patterns (RQ2). Integrating Activity Theory, Social Interaction, and Critical Pedagogy frameworks, a 12-dimensional questionnaire was developed, validated, and applied to 611 responses. This research fills a critical gap by examining engagement where ideological discourse intersects with remote learning constraints, proposing an integrated AT-SOI-CP framework to reconcile technical and sociopolitical dimensions of online I&P education. Quantitative analysis found student-teacher, student-student, and tool use significantly predicted content engagement. However, statistical analysis showed no significant differences in student-teacher interaction (H = 5.178, df = 3, p = 0.159), student-student interaction (H = 7.309, df = 3, p = 0.063), or student-content interaction (H = 5.661, df = 3, p = 0.129) across academic years. The study concludes with recommendations for optimising online pedagogies in I&P courses, emphasising structured collaboration and equitable power dynamics. These findings contribute theoretically and practically to understanding how technological, social, and pedagogical factors shape engagement in evolving educational landscapes.
References
Ahmed, S. A., Hegazy, N. N., Abdel Malak, H. W., Kayser, W. C., Elrafie, N. M., Hassanien, M., Al-Hayani, A. A., El Saadany, S. A., Al-Youbi, A. O., & Shehata, M. H. (2020). Model for utilizing distance learning post COVID-19 using (PACT)™ a cross sectional qualitative study. BMC Medical Education, 20, 400. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02311-1
Alawamleh, M., Al-Twait, L. M., & Al-Saht, G. R. (2022). The effect of online learning on communication between instructors and students during Covid-19 pandemic. Asian Education and Development Studies, 11(2), 380–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-06-2020-0131
Al Mamun, M. A., & Lawrie, G. (2024). Cognitive presence in learner–content interaction process: The role of scaffolding in online self-regulated learning environments. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(3), 791–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00279-7
Amin, F. M., & Sundari, H. (2020). EFL students’ preferences on digital platforms during emergency remote teaching: Video conference, LMS, or messenger application? Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 362–378. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16929
Bates, R., & Khasawneh, S. (2007). Self-efficacy and college students’ perceptions and use of online learning systems. Computers in Human Behaviour, 23(1), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.04.004
Bowden, J. L. H., Tickle, L., & Naumann, K. (2019). The four pillars of tertiary student engagement and success: A holistic measurement approach. Studies in Higher Education, 46(6), 1207–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672647
Bozarth, J., Chapman, D. D., & LaMonica, L. (2004). Preparing for distance learning: Designing an online student orientation course. Educational Technology & Society, 7(1), 87–106. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.7.1.87
Cattaneo, A. A. P., Antonietti, C., & Rauseo, M. (2025). How do vocational teachers use technology? The role of perceived digital competence and perceived usefulness in technology use across different teaching profiles. Vocations and Learning, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-025-09359-4
Cercone, K. (2008). Characteristics of adult learners with implications for online learning design. AACE Journal, 16(2), 137–159. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/24286/
Chen, M. -R. A., Hwang, G. -J., & Chang, Y. -Y. (2019). A reflective thinking‐promoting approach to enhancing graduate students' flipped learning engagement, participation behaviours, reflective thinking and project learning outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2288–2307. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12823
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399
Dewaele, J. -M., Albakistani, A., & Ahmed, I. K. (2022). Is flow possible in the emergency remote teaching foreign language classroom? Education Sciences, 12(7), 444. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070444
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
Ferri, F., Grifoni, P., & Guzzo, T. (2020). Online learning and emergency remote teaching: Opportunities and challenges in emergency situations. Societies, 10(4), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040086
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
Gherheș, V., Stoian, C. E., Fărcașiu, M. A., & Stanici, M. (2021). E-learning vs. face-to-face learning: Analyzing students’ preferences and behaviours. Sustainability, 13(8), 4381. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084381
Giroux, H. A. (1983). Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the opposition. Bergin & Garvey.
Gonçalves, S. P., Sousa, M. J., & Pereira, F. S. (2020). Distance learning perceptions from higher education students—The case of Portugal. Education Sciences, 10(12), 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120374
Han, W. (2020). Using information technology to improve ideological and political education and student management efficiency in colleges. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1533, 022126. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1533/2/022126
Han, X., Zhou, Q., Shi, W., & Yang, S. (2021). Online learning in vocational education of China during COVID-19: Achievements, challenges, and future developments. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 13(2), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.1302.06
Hassan, M. (2021). Online teaching challenges during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(1), 41–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.1.1487
Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203700280
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hu, M., & Li, H. (2017). Student engagement in online learning: A review. International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET.2017.17
Huang, Y. M., Wang, W. S., Lee, H. Y., Lin, C. J., & Wu, T. T. (2024). Empowering virtual reality with feedback and reflection in hands-on learning: Effect of learning engagement and higher-order thinking. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12959
Kaufmann, R., & Vallade, J. I. (2022). Exploring connections in the online learning environment: Student perceptions of rapport, climate, and loneliness. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(10), 1794–1808. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1749670
Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2021). Adopting HyFlex in higher education in response to COVID-19: Students’ perspectives. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 36(3), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2021.1906641
Koutsoupidou, T. (2014). Online distance learning and music training: Benefits, drawbacks and challenges. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and eLearning, 29(3), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2015.1011112
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Leaston, J. A. (2024). Digital learning dynamics: A quantitative analysis of on-line education among adult learners in an urban community college environment (Publication No. 31295460) [Doctoral dissertation, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Prentice-Hall.
Li, Z. (2023). The construction of online learning system of ideological and political education in digital electronic technology course based on FLASK. 4th International Conference on Education, Knowledge and Information Management (ICEKIM 2023), China, 373–380. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-172-2_41
Liu, S. (2020). Research on the application of computer multimedia technology in university network ideological and political course. International Conference on Computers, Information Processing and Advanced Education, Canada, 274–279. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIPAE51077.2020.00077
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning.
Mucundanyi, G. (2019). College student engagement in online learning (Publication No. 22588786) [Doctoral dissertation, New Mexico State University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Ng, D. T. K. (2022). Online aviation learning experience during the COVID‐19 pandemic in Hong Kong and Mainland China. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 443–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13185
Nunnally J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Nunnally J. C., & Bernstein I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Oyarzun, B., Stefaniak, J., Bol, L., & Morrison, G. R. (2018). Effects of learner-to-learner interactions on social presence, achievement and satisfaction. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30, 154–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9157-x
Pham, H. H., & Ho, T. T. H. (2020). Toward a ‘new normal’ with e-learning in Vietnamese higher education during the post COVID19 pandemic. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(7), 1327–1331. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1823945
Rogti, M. (2021). Behaviourism as external stimuli: Improving student extrinsic motivation through behaviour al responses in Algerian college education. Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 21(1), 2941.
Sadeghi, M. (2019). A shift from classroom to distance learning: Advantages and limitations. International Journal of Research in English Education, 4(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.4.1.80
Shen, C. X. (2024). The interplay between internet searching styles and academic self-efficacy: A longitudinal study. Current Psychology, 43, 16689–16698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05632-2
Shor, I. (1992). Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change. University of Chicago Press.
Swan, K. (2003). Learning effectiveness: what the research tells us. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education, practice and direction (pp. 13–45). The Sloan Consortium.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Yu, T., Dai, J., & Wang, C. (2023). Adoption of hybrid learning: Chinese university students’ perspectives. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 390. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211061379
Yumei, Z., Lei, P., & Peng, W. (2023). Problems of academic atmosphere in higher vocational colleges in the post-epidemic era and countermeasures. SHS Web of Conferences, 174, 03026. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317403026
Zeng, J., & Sutummawong, N. (2023). Study on the ideological and political practice teaching of college students based on the internet + technology. International Journal of Informatics and Information Systems, 6(1), 24–30.
Zhan, Z., & Mei, H. (2013). Academic self-concept and social presence in face-to-face and online learning: Perceptions and effects on students' learning achievement and satisfaction across environments. Computers & Education, 69, 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.002
Zhang, Y., Tian, Y., Yao, L., Duan, C., Sun, X., & Niu, G. (2022). Teaching presence predicts cyberloafing during online learning: From the perspective of the community of inquiry framework and social learning theory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 1651–1666. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12531
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 UNIMAS Publisher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
4) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
5) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
