Psychometric validation of the Malay version of the Ryff Psychological Well-Being Scale for caregivers of patients with dementia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.8241.2026Keywords:
psychological well-being, cross-cultural comparison, content validity index, dementia, caregiversAbstract
Despite its widespread international use, the Ryff Psychological Well-Being Scale lacks a culturally validated Malay version, highlighting the need for a reliable tool to assess psychological well-being in Malaysia. Psychological well-being is a multifaceted construct that requires culturally appropriate instruments. The Malay version was developed using rigorous forward-backwards translation to ensure linguistic accuracy and cultural relevance, followed by review from eight experts in psychology, medicine, and gerontology who assessed item clarity, relevance, and cultural suitability. Minor modifications were applied to improve readability without altering underlying constructs. Content validity evaluation showed high item-level and scale-level Content Validity Index (CVI) values, indicating strong agreement among experts. Reliability testing yielded a Cronbach's alpha of 0.865, confirming the robustness of the translated scale, though further evaluation may enhance its psychometric properties. These findings provide a reliable, culturally validated instrument for assessing psychological well-being among Malay-speaking populations, supporting both research applications and evidence-based practice, and facilitating cross-cultural mental health studies.
References
Checa, I., & Espejo, B. (2018). Method effects associated with reversed items in the 29-item Spanish version of Ryff's Well-Being Scales. Neuropsychiatry, 8, 1533–1540. https://doi.org/10.4172/Neuropsychiatry.1000488
Gao, J., & McLellan, R. (2018). Using Ryff’s scales of psychological well-being in adolescents in mainland China. BMC Psychology, 6, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-018-0231-6
Garcia, D., Kazemitabar, M., & Asgarabad, M. H. (2023). The 18-item Swedish version of Ryff's Psychological Well-Being Scale: Psychometric properties based on classical test theory and item response theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1208300. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1208300
Henn, C. M., Hill, C., & Jorgensen, L. I. (2016). An investigation into the factor structure of the Ryff Scales of Psychological Well-Being. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 42(1), a1275. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v42i1.1275
Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 1425–1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0
In, J. (2017). Introduction of a pilot study. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 70(6), 601–605. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2017.70.6.601
Mat Said, N. A., Bujang, S. M., Buang, N. A., Siraj@Ramli, H. H., & Awang Besar, M. N. (2022). Critical thinking transfer practice instrument: A content validity calculation steps based on expert panel evaluation. Education in Medicine Journal, 14(2), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2022.14.3.5
Quinn, B. G., McLaughlin, C., Bunting, A., McLaughlin, L., Scales, S., Craig, S., & Copeland, S. (2021). Exploring the role of effective nurse leadership during COVID-19. Nursing Management, 28(4), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.7748/NM.2021.E1984
Raivio, M. M., Laakkonen, M. -L., & Pitkälä, K. H. (2015). Psychological well-being of spousal caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's disease and associated factors. European Geriatric Medicine, 6(2), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurger.2014.08.006
Robinson-Lane, S. G., Zhang, X., & Patel, A. (2021). Coping and adaptation to dementia family caregiving: A pilot study. Geriatric Nursing, 42(1), 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.08.008
Ruggeri, K., Garcia-Garzon, E., Maguire, Á., Matz, S., & Huppert, F. A. (2020). Well-being is more than happiness and life satisfaction: A multidimensional analysis of 21 countries. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18, 192. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01423-y
Sullivan, G. M. (2011). A primer on the validity of assessment instruments. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 3(2), 119–120. https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-11-00075.1
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s Alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H., & Nikanfar, A. -R. (2015). Design and implementation of a content validity study: Development of an instrument for measuring patient-centred communication. Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.017
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 UNIMAS Publisher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
4) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
5) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
