The effect of phonics instruction on reading skills among primary school students in a rural district in Sarawak, Malaysia

Authors

  • Kartini Abdul Ghani Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
  • Sebastian Ramsay Bahal Universiti Malaysia Sarawak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.10363.2026

Keywords:

phonics instruction, phonological awareness, CEFR, rural education, Malaysia

Abstract

Phonics instruction is widely recognised as essential for early literacy development, yet its effectiveness for upper primary remedial learners in rural districts of Sarawak, Malaysia, remains under-researched. This study examined the effectiveness of structured phonics instruction in improving reading skills among upper primary school students in this context. Sixty Year 4 and Year 5 pupils with low English proficiency (Pre-A1 and Low A1) were selected using purposive sampling. A quasi-experimental pre-test–post-test control-group design was employed. The treatment group received five weeks of phonics instruction based on the Remedial Instruction Toolkit, while the control group followed the standard English curriculum. Reading performance was assessed using the measures Recognising Sound Patterns, Recognising Individual Letter Sounds, and Reading Comprehension. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests, namely the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test and Mann-Whitney U Test. Results indicated significant within-group improvements across all three reading components in the treatment group, with the strongest gains observed in individual letter-sound recognition. Between-group comparison revealed a statistically significant difference only for Recognising Individual Letter Sounds. The findings suggest that structured phonics instruction is particularly effective in strengthening foundational decoding skills among struggling readers in rural and semi-rural English-as-a-foreign-language contexts.

References

Aro, M., & Björn, P. M. (2016). Preservice and inservice teachers' knowledge of language constructs in Finland. Annals of Dyslexia, 66, 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-015-0118-7

Bae, H. S., Yin, L., & Joshi, R. M. (2019). Knowledge about basic language constructs among teachers of English as a Foreign Language in China and South Korea. Annals of Dyslexia, 69, 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-018-00169-z

Chapman, J. W., Arrow, A. W., Braid, C., Greaney, K. T., & Tunmer, W. E. (2018). Early literacy research project: Final report to the New Zealand Ministry of Education. Massey University. https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/194532/Early-Literacy-Research-Project.pdf

Chapman, J. W., Greaney, K. T., Arrow, A. W., & Tunmer, W. E. (2018). Teachers' use of phonics, knowledge of language constructs, and preferred word identification prompts in relation to beginning readers. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 23(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2018.1467937

Husler, G., Sothinathan, J., Joginder Singh, R. K., Koh, M. M. C., & John, A. M. (2021). Remedial instruction toolkit. Ministry of Education Malaysia. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/ri-toolkit-year-4-pdfmjbuhvjhfvjhnfnbhcgchbnvh/273110752

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

Lindström-Sandahl, H., Elwér, Å., Samuelsson, S., & Danielsson, H. (2023). Effects of a phonics intervention in a randomised controlled study in Swedish second-grade students at risk of reading difficulties. Dyslexia, 29(4), 290–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1751

Lory, C., Smith, J. E., Gregori, E., & Matijevic, J. (2023). Effects of individualised coaching on teacher implementation fidelity of systematic instruction with students with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 58(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/2154164723058001

Macasaet, B. T. B. (2021). How teaching practices affect reading literacy: A PISA 2018 investigation on Southeast Asian countries. Journal of Comparative Education, 90, 77–130. https://doi.org/10.53106/160957582021050090003

Masturi, S. Z., Kosnin, A. B. M., & Zainudin, F. (2022). The barriers in teaching English skills encountered by Malaysian rural-area preschool teachers: A preliminary study. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(2), 4696–4703.

Md Nawawi, N., Zuhaimi, N., Sabu, K., Mahamud, N. S. R., & Nasir, N. A. M. (2021). CEFR for languages and its effective implementation in secondary schools in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 11(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol11.1.6.2021

Moats, L. C. (2020). Teaching reading is rocket science: What expert teachers of reading should know and be able to do. American Educator. https://www.aft.org/ae/summer2020/moats

Mohd Don, Z., & Knowles, G. O. (2021). Synthetic phonics, the digital humanities, and the teaching of beginning learners of English. Educatum Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.37134/ejoss.vol7.2.fa.1.2021

Mohd Zin, M. A., Tan, K. H., Mohd Rashid, S. M., & Mat Saad, S. (2023). Teachers' beliefs and teaching practices in teaching phonics to lower primary learners. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(5), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.5.30

Nafgerin, G. G., & Bakar, K. A. (2023). The use of the jolly phonics method in improving English reading and writing skills among preschool students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 13(12), 3726–3738. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i12/20219

National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. https://www.readingrockets.org/resources/resource-library/report-national-reading-panel-teaching-children-read

Nietschke, Y., Monty, A., Dabrowski, A., Goundar, P., Ahmed, S. K., Wong, D., & Spink, J. (2024). Strengthening foundational learning in the ASEAN region: A review of promising practices. Australian Council for Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.37517/978-1-74286-740-3

Paige, D. D., Smith, G. S., & Rupley, W. H. (2023). A study of phonemic awareness, letter sound knowledge, and word reading in struggling adolescent students. Literacy Research and Instruction, 62(3), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2022.2138648

Papadogiannis, I., Wallace, M., Poulopoulos, V., Vassilakis, C., Lepouras, G., & Platis, N. (2023). An assessment of the effectiveness of the remedial teaching education policy. Knowledge, 3(3), 349–363. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge3030024

Torgerson, C. J., Brooks, G., & Hall, J. (2006). A systematic review of the research literature on the use of phonics in the teaching of reading and spelling. Department for Education and Skills. https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1608197

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.

Webber, C., Patel, H., Cunningham, A., Fox, A., Vousden, J., Castles, A., & Shapiro, L. (2024). An experimental comparison of additional training in phoneme awareness, letter‐sound knowledge and decoding for struggling beginner readers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 282–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12641

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Ghani, K. A., & Bahal, S. R. (2026). The effect of phonics instruction on reading skills among primary school students in a rural district in Sarawak, Malaysia. Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, 12(1), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.10363.2026