RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN VOCABULARY ACQUISITION AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AMONG MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS
Abstract
This paper explores the vocabulary acquisition of 143 middle school students from an East
Malaysian school, examining its correlation with gender, attitudes, and perceived
problems faced in vocabulary learning. Using the Contextualised Word Family
(CONTEXTUALISED WORD FAMILY) model, the study tested the effectiveness of explicit
vocabulary instruction over 30 sessions. The study utilised a one-group pretest-posttest
design, measuring the learners’ vocabulary size through the Productive Vocabulary Levels
Test (PVLT) and a questionnaire. The results showed an increase in vocabulary size with
no significant difference based on gender, a very weak negative correlation with attitudes
towards vocabulary learning, and mostly weak positive but significant relationships with
three of the learners’ perceived problems faced in vocabulary learning. This study
provides some important pedagogical implications for teacher practice and
recommendations for future research.
References
Adolps, S., & Schmitt, N. (2003). Lexical coverage of spoken discourse. Applied Linguistics,
(4), 425-438. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.425
Afzal, N. (2019). A Study on vocabulary learning problems encountered by BA English
majors at the university level of education. Arab World English Journal, 10(3) 81-
https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no3.6
Ahmadi, S. R. M. (2017). The impact of incidental and intentional L2 vocabulary learning
on depths and breadth dimensions of vocabulary knowledge. The Buckingham
Journal of Language and Linguistics, 10, 1-17.
https://doi.org/10.5750/bjll.v10i0.1270
Alhamami, M. (2022). Language learners’ attitudes toward online and face-to-face
language environments. Front Psychol, 13, 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.926310
Al-Khasawneh, F. (2019). The impact of vocabulary knowledge on the reading
comprehension of Saudi EFL learners. Journal of Language and Education, 5(3),
-34. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2019.8822.
Bai, Y. (2020). The relationship of test takers’ learning motivation, attitudes towards the
actual test use, and test performance of the college English test in China. Lang
Test Asia, 10, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-020-00108-z
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary
instruction. Guilford Press.
Blachowicz, C. L. Z. (2005). Vocabulary essentials: From research to practice for improved
instruction. Scott Foresman and Co.
Blachowicz, C. L. Z., & Fisher, P. (2000). Vocabulary instruction. In M. L. Kamil, P. B.
Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 503-
. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Blachowicz, C. L. Z., Fisher, P. J. L., Ogle, D., & Watts-Taffe, S. (2006). Vocabulary:
Questions from the classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 524-
https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.4.5
Chan, C. H., & Aziz, A. A. (2021). Employment of language learning strategies by Chinese
school learners in learning ESL vocabulary. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences
and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(3), 330-339.
https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i3.707.
Chung, S. F. (2012). Research–based vocabulary instruction for English language learners.
Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 12(2), 105-120.
https://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/september_2012/chung.pdf
Curtis, M. E. (1987). Vocabulary testing and vocabulary instruction. In M. G. McKeown &
M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 37-52). Erlbaum.
Dörnyei, Z. (2006). Individual differences in second language acquisition. AILA
Review, 19(1), 42-68. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.05dor
Frayer, D. A., Frederick, W. C., & Kalausmeier, H. J. (1969). A schema for testing the level
of concept mastery. Technical Report No. 16. University of Winconsin Research
and Development Centre for Cognitive Learning.
Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1992). A student’s contribution to second-language
learning. Part I: Cognitive variables. Language Teaching, 25, 211-220.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480000700X
Graves, M. F. (2000). A vocabulary programme to compliment and bolster a middle grade
comprehension programme. In B. M. Taylor, M. F. Graves, & P. van den Broek
(Eds.), Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades
(pp.116-135). International Reading Association.
Gu, P. Y. (2003). Vocabulary learning in a second language: Person, task, context and
strategies. TESL-EJ Journal, 7, 1-25. http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESl-
EJ/ej26/a4.html#top
Hadi, A. S. A. (2017). Significance of vocabulary in achieving efficient learning. American
Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS).
(1), 271-285. http://asrjetsjournal.org
Halvaei, M., & Ansarin, A. (2018). Learner effectiveness: A cause of learner strategy
use? International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(4), 1-6.
https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.4p.1
Haris, M., & Yunus, M. M. (2018). Vocabulary size of ESL IGCSE students. International
Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR), 6(8), 263-267.
http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7518
Hunt, A., & Beglar, D. (1998). Current research and practice in teaching vocabulary. JALT,
(1), 7-11. https://jalt-publications.org/tlt/articles/1914-current-research-andpractice-
teaching-vocabulary
Irvin, S., & Blankenship, K. G. (2022). Vocabulary & academic success in university
undergraduate students. Teaching and Learning in Communication Sciences &
Disorders, 6(2), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.30707/TLCSD6.2.1660595992.600476
Karami, A., & Bowles, F. A. (2019). Which strategy promotes retention? Intentional
vocabulary learning, incidental vocabulary learning, or a mixture of both?
Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(9), 25-43.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2019v44.n9.2
Kidd, E., Donnelly, S. & Christiansen, M. H. (2018). Individual differences in language
acquisition and processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(2), 154-169.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.006.
Laufer, B. & Nation, I. S. P. (1999). A vocabulary size test of controlled productive
ability. Language Testing 16(1), 33-51.
https://doi.org/10.1191/026553299672614616
Lee, B. C., Pandian, A., Rethinasamy, S., & Tan, D. A. L. (2019). Effects of PWIM in the ESL
classroom: Vocabulary knowledge development among primary Malaysian
learners. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 25(4), 179-197.
http://ejournals.ukm.my/3l/issue/view/1230
Lee, S., & Pulido, D. (2017). The impact of topic interest, L2 proficiency, and gender on EFL
incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language Teaching Research,
, 118-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816637381
Lee, S. (2020). Examining the roles of aptitude, motivation, strategy use, language
processing experience, and gender in the development of the breadth and depth
of EFL learners’ vocabulary knowledge. SAGE Open, 10(4), 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020977883
Li, S., Hiver, P., & Papi, M. (2022). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition
and individual differences (1st ed.). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003270546
Linda, A., & Shah, P. M. (2020). Vocabulary acquisition style in the ESL classroom: A survey
on the use of vocabulary learning strategies by the primary 3 learners. Creative
Education, 11, 1973-1987. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.1110144
Llach, M. P. A., & Gallego, M. T. (2012). Vocabulary knowledge development and gender
differences in a second language. ELIA: Estudios De Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada,
, 45-75.
Mckeown, M. G., & Beck, I. L. (2011). Making vocabulary interventions engaging and
effective. In R. E. O’Connor & P. F. Vadasy (Eds.), Handbook of reading
interventions (pp. 138-168). Guilford Press.
Ming, W. (2007). An examination of vocabulary learning of college-level learners of
English in China. The Asian Journal, 9(2), 93-114. https://www.asian-efljournal.
com/main-editions-new/an-examination-of-vocabulary-learning-ofcollege-
level-learners-of-english-in-china/index.htm
Mohseni-Far, M. (2007). Techniques and strategies utilized for vocabulary acquisition:
The necessity to design a multifaceted framework with an instructionally wise
equilibrium. Porta Linguarum, 8, 137-152.
https://www.ugr.es/~portalin/articulos/PL_numero8/8-MOHAMMAD.pdf
Mutua, J., & Oyoo, S. (2020). Gender differences in learning strategies and academic
achievement among form three secondary school students in Nairobi County,
Kenya. International Journal of Applied Psychology, 10(1), 1-7.
http://kerd.ku.ac.ke/123456789/327
Nagy, W. E. (1988). Teaching vocabulary to improve reading comprehension. International
Reading Association.
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
Nemati, A. (2010). Proficiency and size of receptive vocabulary: Comparing EFL and ESL
environments. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology,
(1), 46-53. https://soeagra.com/ijert/vol1/ijert6.pdf
Qian, D. D., & Lin, L. H. F. (2020). The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and
language proficiency. In S. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary
studies (pp. 66-80). Taylor & Francis.
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Palgrave
Macmillan.
Schmitt, N. (2008). Teaching vocabulary. Pearson Education.
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge. Cambridge University
Press.
Schmitt, N., & Meara, P. (1997). Researching vocabulary through a word knowledge
framework: Word associations and verbal suffixes. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 19(1), 17-36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001022
Sheehan, A. (2004). Making sense of words. Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs,
Office of English Language Programs.
http://forum.state.gov/vols/vol42/no1/p02.htm
Silsüpür, B. (2017). Does using language games affect vocabulary learning in EFL Classes?
Journal of Foreign Language Education and Technology, 2(1), 83-104.
https://www.jflet.com/articles/does-using-language-games-affect-vocabularylearning-
in-efl-classes.pdf
Subon, F. (2016). Direct vocabulary instruction: The effects of contextualised word
families on learners’ vocabulary acquisition. Procedia - Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 224, 284-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sbspro.2016.05.461
Subon, F. (2017). Direct vocabulary instruction: The effects of contextualised word families
on students’ vocabulary acquisition [Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Teknologi
MARA].
Subon, F. (2018). The contextualized word family model of direct vocabulary instruction.
IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 23, 57-70.
https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2303035770
Sulaiman, N. A., Salehuddin, K., & Khairuddin, R. (2018). Academic word list knowledge of
Malaysian ESL undergraduates. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 18(4),
-14. http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2018-1804-01
Tahir, M. H. M., Albakri, I. S. M. A., Adnan, A. H. M., & Karim, A. R. (2020). The effects of
explicit vocabulary instructions on secondary ESL students’ vocabulary learning.
L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 26(2). http://journalarticle.ukm.my/15156/
Tahir, M. H. M., Shah, D. S. M., Shak, M. S. Y., Albakri, I. S. M. A., & Adnan, A. H. M. (2021).
Explicit vocabulary instruction: Effects of vocabulary learning on Form Two ESL
learners. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(3), 1227-1247.
https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i3.19539
Thompson, A. S. (2021). Attitudes and beliefs. In T. Gregersen & S. Mercer (Ed.), The
Routledge handbook of the psychology of language learning and teaching (pp.
-160). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429321498
Viera, R. T. (2017). Vocabulary knowledge in the production of written texts: a case study
on EFL language learners. Technological Magazine - ESPOL, 30(3), 89-
http://www.rte.espol.edu.ec/index.php/tecnologica/article/view/628
Walker, N., Monaghan, P., Schoetensack, C., & Rebuschat, P. (2020). Distinctions in the
acquisition of vocabulary and grammar: An individual differences
approach. Language Learning, 70(S2), 221–254.
https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12395
Webb, S., Yanagisawa, A., & Uchihara, T. (2020). How effective are intentional vocabularylearning
activities? A meta-analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 104(4), 715-
https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12671
Wilson, R. (2000). A summary of Stephen Krashen's “principles and practice in second
language acquisition”. SCIRBD.
https://www.scribd.com/document/333908817/Krashen-s-Second-Language-
Acquisition-Theory-summary-docx
Wong, A. S. C., Lee, J. Y. V., Fung, M., & Willibrord, O. (2019). Vocabulary size of Malaysian
secondary school students. International Journal of Modern Languages and
Applied Linguistics, 3(4), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.24191/ijmal.v3i2.7364
Yousefi, M. H., & Biria, R. (2018). The effectiveness of L2 vocabulary instruction: A metaanalysis.
Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3(21),
-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-018-0062-2
Zimmerman, K. (2005). Newly placed versus continuing students: Comparing vocabulary
size. ESL Reporter, 38(1), 52-60. http://ojsdev.byuh.edu/index.php/
Issue1/article/download/1248/1198
Copyright (c) 2023 UNIMAS Publisher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
