RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TECHNOLOGICAL COMPONENTS AND INVENTIVE SKILLS AMONG MALAY LANGUAGE TEACHERS
Abstract
Technology use in classroom can improve teachers’ ability to deliver effective and
relevant content. Teachers should be more prepared to apply technology to ensure that
students will have more fun and have a high interest in continuing to learn in the era of
globalisation which is based on the use of these information communication technology
elements in the classroom during the teaching and facilitation process. This study
identifies the relationship between technological knowledge, technological content
knowledge, technological pedagogical knowledge, technological pedagogical content
knowledge, and inventive skills for teachers. A total of 400 questionnaires were
distributed to teachers who taught Malay language subjects in secondary schools in
Malaysia. To test the hypothesis, the structural equation using the PLS-SEM framework
was used. The results showed that technological knowledge, technological content
knowledge, technological pedagogical knowledge, and technological pedagogical content
knowledge have a positive relationship with inventive skills for teachers.
References
Absari, N., Priyanto, P., & Muslikhin, M. (2020). The effectiveness of technology, pedagogy
and content knowledge (TPACK) in learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan
Kejuruan, 26(1), 43-51.
Akhwani, A., & Rahayu, D. W. (2021). Analisis komponen TPACK guru SD sebagai kerangka
kompetensi guru profesional di Abad 21. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(4), 1918-1925.
Alrwaished, N., Alkandari, A., & Alhashem, F. (2020). Exploring in-and pre-service science
and mathematics teachers’ technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge
(TPACK): What next? Teknologia Kemian Opetuksessa, 1(1), 6113-6131.
Amran, N., & Rosli, R. (2017). Kefahaman guru tentang kemahiran abad ke-21 (Teachers’
understanding in 21st century skills). http://conference.kuis.edu.my/pasak2017
/images /prosiding /pendidikan/09-Nurzarina.Amran-UKM.pdf.
Arbaa, R., Jamil, H., & Ahmad, M. Z. (2017). Model bersepadu penerapan kemahiran abad
ke-21 dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 42(10),
-11.
Ariffin, N. A., & Yunus, F. (2017). Kesediaan guru prasekolah dalam melaksanakan KBAT
dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran. International Journal of Learning, Teaching
and Educational Research, 21(1), 217-230.
Asad, M. M., Hussain, N., Wadho, M., Khand, Z. H., & Churi, P. P. (2021). Integration of elearning
technologies for interactive teaching and learning process: An empirical
study on higher education institutes of Pakistan. Journal of Applied Research in
Higher Education, 13(3), 649-663.
Cansoy, R., & Parlar, H. (2018). Examining the relationships between the level of schools
for being professional learning communities and teacher professionalism. MOJES:
Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(3), 13-27.
Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Teo, Y. H. (2019). Enhancing and modeling teachers’ design
beliefs and efficacy of technological pedagogical content knowledge for 21st
century quality learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(2), 360-
Chai, C. S., Jong, M., Yin, H. B., Chen, M., & Zhou, W. (2019). Validating and modelling
teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge for integrative science,
technology, engineering and Mathematics education. Journal of Educational
Technology & Society, 22(3), 61-73.
Chee, J., Nor, M. M., Othman, A. J., & Rahman, M. N. A. (2018). Isu pengetahuan
kandungan, pedagogi dan teknologi dalam kalangan guru prasekolah. JuKu: Jurnal
Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 6(1), 7-21.
Cohen, J. (1988). Set correlation and contingency tables. Applied Psychological
Measurement, 12(4), 425-434.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable
variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing
Research, 18(3), 382-388.
Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological
pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57(3), 1953-
Gupta, V., & Jain, N. (2017). Harnessing information and communication technologies for
effective knowledge creation: Shaping the future of education. Journal of
Enterprise Information Management, 30(5), 831-855.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017). Advanced issues in partial
least squares structural equation modeling. Sage publications.
Hasin, I., & Nasir, M. K. M. (2021). The effectiveness of the use of information and
communication technology (ICT) in rural secondary schools in Malaysia. Journal
of Education and e-Learning Research, 8(1), 59-64.
Hatlevik, I. K., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Students' evaluation of digital information: The
role teachers play and factors that influence variability in teacher behaviour.
Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 56-63.
Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to
use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model.
Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48-59.
Kamary, N. M., & Hamzah, M. B. (2019). Kesediaan guru matematik daerah Kuala Langat
dalam melaksanakan pembelajaran abad ke 21. Seminar Antarabangsa Isu-Isu
Pendidikan (ISPEN 2019) (pp. 110-130). Kolej Universiti Islam Selangor.
Koh, J. H. L., & Chai, C. S. (2014). Teacher clusters and their perceptions of technological
pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) development through ICT lesson design.
Computers & Education, 70, 222-232.
Kusaini, E. A., Mahamod, Z., & Mohammad, W. M. R. W. (2022). Validation
instrumentation and measurement of technological pedagogical content
knowledge (TPACK) for teachers. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 10(10), 69-98.
Lai, D., Lew, S. L., & Ooi, S. Y. (2022). Mobile interactive system in virtual classroom based
on TPACK: A study from students’ perspectives. Journal of Logistics, Informatics
and Service Science, 9(3), 159-171.
Malik, S., Rohendi, D., & Widiaty, I. (2019). Technological pedagogical content knowledge
(TPACK) with information and communication technology (ICT) integration: A
literature review. 5th UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational
Education and Training (ICTVET 2018) (pp. 498-503). Atlantis Press.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A
framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers’ college record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
Mohammad Rusdi, A. M. (2017). Pengetahuan teknologi pedagogi kandungan dan
kreativiti pengajaran dalam kalangan guru bahasa Arab di Malaysia [Doctoral
Dissertation, University of Malaya].
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/268879483.pdf
Mohd Qhairil, A. A. (2018). Keberkesanan penggunaan peta pemikiran terhadap aspek
penulisan karangan, sikap dan pencapaian bahasa Melayu murid tahun 6.
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. http://journalarticle.ukm.my/9859/
NCREL & Metiri Group. (2003). enGauge 21st century skills: Literacy in the digital age.
https://www. crel.org/engauge
Ngaewkoodrua, N., & Yuenyong, C. (2018). The teachers' existing ideas of enhancing
students' inventive thinking skills. Turkish Online Journal of Educational
Technology-TOJET, 17(2), 169-175.
Md Darus, N, & A. Hamid, A. H. (2018). Kepimpinan teknologi pengetua dan hubungan
terhadap kompetensi ICT guru sekolah menengah kebangsaan daerah Seremban
dan Kuala Pilah. Prosiding Seminar Kebangsaan Majlis Dekan Pendidikan
Universiti Awam 2018 (pp. 451- 466). Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin.
Oke, A., & Fernandes, F. A. P. (2020). Innovations in teaching and learning: Exploring the
perceptions of the education sector on the 4th industrial revolution (4IR). Journal
of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(2), 1-22.
Oliveira, K. K. D. S., & de Souza, R. A. (2022). Digital transformation towards education
0. Informatics in Education, 21(2), 283-309.
Puspitarini, Y. D., & Hanif, M. (2019). Using learning media to increase learning motivation
in elementary school. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 53-60.
Rachmadtullah, R., Yustitia, V., Setiawan, B., Fanny, A. M., Pramulia, P., Susiloningsih, W.,
& Ardhian, T. (2020). The challenge of elementary school teachers to encounter
superior generation in the 4.0 industrial revolution: Study
literature. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(4), 1879-
Rahayu, I. S., Karana, I., Hardiansyah, M. A., Dewi, D. H., & Elihami, E. (2021). The
relationship of online game addiction with learning motivation in school age
children on COVID-19 pandemic. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 384-396.
Ravendran, D. R., & Daud, M. Y. (2020). Faktor–faktor yang mempengaruhi guru
matematik sekolah rendah dalam mengintegrasikan penggunaan teknologi dalam
PdPc. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 1(3), 24-33.
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Schlittgen, R. (2014). Genetic algorithm segmentation in
partial least squares structural equation modeling. OR spectrum, 36(1), 251-276.
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. W. (2012). Editor's comments: A critical look at
the use of PLS-SEM. MIS quarterly, 36(1), 3-14.
Roslee, T., & Tisebio, A. T. (2020). Kesan komitmen organisasi pendidikan sebagai
moderator ke atas hubungan kepimpinan teknologi pengetua dalam pengurusan
kurikulum dengan efikasi kendiri guru. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and
Humanities (MJSSH), 5(3), 30-46
Sakdiah, H., & Jamilah, M. (2022). Digital literacy students facing to independent learning
independent campus curriculum. Community Medicine and Education Journal,
(1), 217-222.
Saleh, S., Muhammad, A., & Abdullah, S. M. S. (2020). STEM project-based approach in
enhancing conceptual understanding and inventive thinking skills among
secondary school students. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 5(1), 234-254.
Shafie, H., Majid, F. A., & Ismail, I. S. (2019). Technological pedagogical content knowledge
(TPACK) in teaching 21st century skills in the 21st century classroom. Asian
Journal of University Education, 15(3), 24-33.
Spiteri, M., & Chang, R. S. N. (2020). Literature review on the factors affecting primary
teachers’ use of digital technology. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25,
-128.
Srisawasdi, N. (2014). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in using
computerized science laboratory environment: An arrangement for science
teacher education program. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced
Learning, 9(1), 123-143.
Sulaiman, J., & Ismail, S. N. (2020). Teacher competence and 21st century skills in
transformation schools 2025 (TS25). Universal Journal of Educational
Research, 8(8), 3536-3544.
Susanti, N., & Mukminin, A. (2022). The effects of TPACK instrument variables on teacher
candidates in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Theory and
Practice, 22(2), 107-115.
Tanak, A. (2020). Designing TPACK-based course for preparing student teachers to teach
science with technological pedagogical content knowledge. Kasetsart Journal of
Social Sciences, 41(1), 53-59.
Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to learning and schooling
in the digital networked world of the 21st century. Journal of Computer Assisted
Learning, 29(5), 403-413.
Williams, L. J., Vandenberg, R. J., & Edwards, J. R. (2009). 12 structural equation modeling
in management research: A guide for improved analysis. Academy of
Management Annals, 3(1), 543-604.
Wold, H. O. A. (1982). Soft modeling: The basic design and some extensions. In K. G.
Joreskog & H. O. A. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observations: Part II (pp.
-54). North-Holland.
Copyright (c) 2023 UNIMAS Publisher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
