Making sense of leadership and language styles of student leaders in a Malaysian public secondary school

  • Sharifah Syakila Syed Shaharuddin Student
  • Minah Harun
Keywords: leadership and language styles, student leaders, narratives, malaysian public secondary school

Abstract

Language plays an essential role in everyday experiences, given that it can facilitate and maintain congenial relationships if it is used properly. Not much is known about how young student leaders make sense of their communicative acts with their peers, especially in the Malaysian context. The study investigated student leaders' sensemaking of leadership and language use in a public secondary school in Northern Malaysia. Their narratives were obtained through a qualitative study using focus groups and face-to-face in-depth interviews. The findings revealed several themes that explain the preferred spoken language styles among the student leaders in performing their responsibilities at school. The study demonstrated that appropriate language use should be part of the training of student leaders at school or leadership training curriculum for secondary school leaders nationwide. In that way, the student leaders will not only be exposed to proper language use in communicating leadership, but they will also be motivated to polish up and reflect on their language use for continuous self-development.

References

Bolman, L., & Deal, T. (2008). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist, 26(2), 120-123. https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/OutputFile/937606

Broderick, R. C. (1976). The Catholic encyclopedia. Thomas Nelson Inc.

Carter, T. (2018). Preparing generation Z for the teaching profession. SRATE Journal, 27(1), 1-8.

Chaer, A. (2007). Linguistik umum (3rd ed.). Penerbit Rineka Cipta.

Chaika, E. (1982). At Issue: Thought disorder or speech disorder in Schizophrenia?

https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/8.4.587

Schizophrenia Bulletin, 8(4), 587-591.

https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/8.4.587

Cilliers, E. J. (2017). The challenge of teaching generation Z. People: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 188-198. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.31.188198

Cowan, N. (2013). Working memory underpins cognitive development, learning, and education. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 197-223.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9246-y

Culpeper, J., & Kan, Q. (2020). Communicative styles, rapport, and student engagement: An online peer mentoring scheme. Applied Linguistics, 41(5), 756-786.

https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz035

Demir, B., & Sönmez, G. (2021). Generation Z students' expectations from English language instruction. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 683-701. https://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/2253/716

https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.903536

Dugan, J. P., & Komives, S. R. (2007). Developing leadership capacity in college students. National Clearinghouse for Leadership Programs.

Gleason, J. B., & Ratner, N. B. (2009). The development of language (7th ed.). Allyn & Bacon. https://archive.org/details/developmentoflan0000unse_b9r5

Groenewald, C., Essner, B., Wright, D., & Fesinmeyer, M. (2014). The economic costs of chronic pain among a cohort of treatment-seeking adolescents in the United States. The Journal of Pain, 15(9), 925-933.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2014.06.002

Hartman, N. S., & Conklin, T. A. (2020). Books and posters: Creating conversations that result in learning. Management Teaching Review, 6(3), 223-236.

https://doi.org/10.1177/2379298120944597

Harun, M. (2007). Malay-Chinese interethnic communication: An analysis of sensemaking in everyday experiences [Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio University]. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ohiou1172258388

Harun, M., & Din, K. (2017). Can we groom leadership? Learning from student leaders. In Z. Kefeli, A. M. Ahmad, M. A. Mamat, & M. Abdul Mutalib (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Qalb-Guided Leadership in Higher Education Institutions: Towards Empowering Value Drive Academic Leadership (pp. 330-338). PIINA USIM

Hesti, R. R., & Rosaria, M. A. (2019). Meme as political criticism towards 2019 Indonesian general election: A critical discourse analysis. Studies in English Language and Education, 6(2), 239-250.

https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v6i2.14020

Igel, C., & Urquhart, V. (2012). Generation Z, meet cooperative learning: Properly implemented cooperative learning strategies can increase student engagement and achievement. Middle School Journal, 43(4), 16-21.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2012.11461816

Joos, M. (1967). The five clocks: A linguistic excursion into the five styles of English usage. Harcourt, Brace & World.

Keraf, G. (1984). Linguistik bandingan historis. Gramedia.

Keraf, G. (1991). Tata bahasa rujukan bahasa Indonesia untuk tingkat pendidikan menengah. Gramedia Widiasrana Indonesia.

Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2011). The five practices of exemplary leadership (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://www.pnbhs.school.nz/wpcontent/uploads /2015/11/The-Five-Practices-of-Exemplary-Leadership.pdf

Kramer, O. (2017). Genetic algorithm essentials. Springer International Publishing.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52156-5_2

Kruger, R., & Casey, M. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Lewis, W. (2010). Serious use of a serious game for language learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 20(2), 175-195. http://doi.org/10.3233/JAI-2010-0006

Liao, C. I. (2020). Language used by Chinese Malaysian students studying at an Australian university. Issues in Language Studies, 9(1), 69-85.

https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.2350.2020

Llamas, C. (2007). "A place between places": Language and identities in a border town. Language in Society, 36(04), 95-120.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404507070455

Marquet, D. L. (2020). Leadership is language: The hidden power of what you say and what you don't. Penguin Publishing Group.

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (n.d.). Malaysia education blueprint (Higher education) 2015-2025. https://www.kooperationinternational.de/uploads/ media/3._Malaysia_Education_Blueprint_2015-2025__Higher_Education__.pdf

Myers, K. K., & Sadaghiani, K. (2010). Millennials in the workplace: A communication perspective on millennials' organizational relationships and performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 225-238.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9172-7

Oktanika, W. N., Riyadi S., & Dewi R. (2017). Male and female students' linguistic politeness in speaking classroom. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 1(2), 149-156.

https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v1i2.14510

Önem, E. E. (2016). A study on gender differences in the length of requests in Turkish. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 12(2), 13-21. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1117945

Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation (Vol. 4). Sage Publications, Inc.

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

Poláková, P., & Klimova, B. (2019). Mobile technology and generation Z in the English language classroom - A preliminary study. Education Sciences, 9(3), 203.

https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030203

Prensky, M. (2001). Fun, play and games: What makes games engaging. Digital game-based learning, 5(1), 5-31. https://marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20 %20Digital%20GameBased%20Learning-Ch5.pdf

Rosa, N. M., & Hastings, S. O. (2018). Managing millennials: Looking beyond generational stereotypes. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(4), 920-930.

https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-10-2015-0193

Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2016). Generation Z goes to college. John Wiley & Sons.

Souba, W. W., & Souba, M.H. (2016). Leadership and the limitations of language.

https://doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2016.52005

Open Journal of Leadership, 5(2), 39.

https://doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2016.52005

Starman, A. B. (2013). The case study as a type of qualitative research. Journal Of Contemporary Educational Studies, 1(1), 28-43. https://www.sodobna-pedagogika.net/en/archive/load-article/?id=899

Stein, J. (2013). Millennials: The me me me generation. Time Magazine, 20, 1-8. https://time.com/247/millennials-the-me-me-me-generation/

Tan, C. Y. (2014). Influence of contextual challenges and constraints on learning-centered leadership. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(3), 451-468.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2013.866967

Tie, F. H. (2012). Research publication as a strategy to improve international academic ranking. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 15(4), 437-450.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2012.696707

Ting, S. H. (2010). Research writing of Malaysian scholars in national refereed journals. UNIMAS Research Update, 5(2), 12.

Torocsik, M., Szucs, K., & Kehl, D. (2014). How generations think: Research on generation Z. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Communication, 1, 23-45.

Wahyuningsih, S. (2018). Men and women differences in using language: A case study of students at STAIN Kudus. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 3(1), 79-90.

https://doi.org/10.30659/e.3.1.79-90

Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications.

Wiedmer, T. (2015). Generations do differ: Best practices in leading traditionalists, boomers, and generations X, Y, and Z. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 82(1), 51-58. https://search.proquest.com/openview/712ca7200529c4e38d54bde5a0a7 257f/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=47978

Published
2022-11-27
How to Cite
Syed Shaharuddin, S. S., & Harun, M. (2022). Making sense of leadership and language styles of student leaders in a Malaysian public secondary school. Issues in Language Studies, 11(2), 81-97. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.4377.2022