Am I Promoting Feedback Cycle and Sociomaterial Learning?

Insights from Practitioner Inquiry on Written Corrective Feedback in Final Drafts

  • Daron Benjamin Loo Centre for English Language Communication, National University of Singapore
Keywords: Written corrective feedback, Practitioner inquiry, Feedback cycle, Sociomaterial learning


This study employed practitioner inquiry to determine whether feedback cycle and socio-material learning was promoted through the provision of written corrective feedback (WCF). The context of study was the final draft submitted in an academic writing course for arts and social science students. The practitioner inquiry was shaped by mixed methods, through the quantitative (categorisation) and qualitative (analytical) examination of WCF. The categorisation of WCF was guided by a feedback typology and the extent of learning opportunities. A total of 309 instances of WCF were found across 55 final drafts. Indirect and metalinguistic feedback on Content and Language was frequent. Furthermore, most of the WCF was restricted to the final essay, with minimal expansive opportunities for students to extend their learning beyond this writing course. In the subsequent analysis of the WCF, this study concluded that feedback was provided for the purpose of keeping track of work done. To really promote a feedback cycle or sociomaterial learning, writing instructors should consider improving students’ feedback literacy skills.


Amrhein, H. R., & Nassaji, H. (2010). Written corrective feedback: What do students and teachers think is right and why? Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 95-127.

Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102-118.

Black, D. A., & Nanni, A. (2016). Written corrective feedback: Preferences and justifications of teachers and students in a Thai context. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 16(3), 99-114.

Bolton, K., Botha, W., & Bacon-Shone, J. (2017). English-medium instruction in Singapore higher education: Policy, realities and challenges. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38(10), 913-930.

Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219-233.

Carless, D. (2020). Longitudinal perspectives on students' experiences of feedback: A need for teacher-student partnerships. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(3), 425-438.

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315-1325.

Casey, A. (2012). A self-study using action research: Changing site expectations and practice stereotypes. Educational Action Research, 20(2), 219-232.

Chang, G. C. L. (2014). Writing feedback as an exclusionary practice in higher education. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 37(3), 262-275.

Chen, L., Loo, D. B., & Tajoda, H. (2016). Effects of students' engagement on written corrective feedback on writing quality. APHEIT Journal, 5(2), 40-54.

Chong, S. W. (2020). Reconsidering student feedback literacy from an ecological perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-13.

Driscoll, D. L., Paszek, J., Gorzelsky, G., Hayes, C. L., & Jones, E. (2020). Genre knowledge and writing development: Results from the writing transfer project. Written Communication, 37(1), 69-103.

Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97-107.

Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36(3), 353-371.

Evans, N. W., Hartshorn, K. J., McCollum, R. M., & Wolfersberger, M. (2010). Contextualizing corrective feedback in second language writing pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 445-463.

Ferris, D. R. (2014). Responding to student writing: Teachers' philosophies and practices. Assessing Writing, 19, 6-23.

Ferris, D., Brown, J., Liu, H., & Stine, M. E. A. (2011). Responding to L2 students in college writing classes: Teacher perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 45(2), 207-234.

Gibbs, P., Cartney, P., Wilkinson, K., Parkinson, J., Cunningham, S., James-Reynolds, C., Zoubir, T., Brown, V., Barter, P., Sumner, P., MacDonald, A., Dayananda, A., & Pitt, A. (2017). Literature review on the use of action research in higher education. Educational Action Research, 25(1), 3-22.

Gourlay, L. (2017). Student engagement, 'learnification' and the sociomaterial: Critical perspectives on higher education policy. Higher Education Policy, 30(1), 23-34.

Gravett, K. (2020). Feedback literacies as sociomaterial practice. Critical Studies in Education, 1-14.

Gravett, K., & Winstone, N. E. (2019). "Feedback interpreters": The role of learning development professionals in facilitating university students' engagement with feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(6), 723-738.

Han, Y., & Xu, Y. (2019). Student feedback literacy and engagement with feedback: A case study of Chinese undergraduate students. Teaching in Higher Education, 1-16.

Huang, L. S. (2018). A call for critical dialogue: EAP assessment from the practitioner's perspective in Canada. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 35, 70-84.

Jou, Y. (2019). Scaffolding L2 writers' metacognitive awareness of voice in article reviews: A case study of SFL-based pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 41, 100770.

Junqueira, L., & Payant, C. (2015). "I just want to do it right, but it's so hard": A novice teacher's written feedback beliefs and practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 19-36.

Kumar, V., & Stracke, E. (2007). An analysis of written feedback on a PhD thesis. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(4), 461-470.

Lee, I. (2009). Ten mismatches between teachers' beliefs and written feedback practice. ELT Journal, 63(1), 13-22.

Lee, I. (2019). Teachers' frequently asked questions about focused written corrective feedback. TESOL Journal, 10(3), e00427.

Loo, D. B. (2015). Problematising unfocused written feedback: A case study on four university students' essays. Issues in Language Studies, 4(1), 63-74.

Loo, D. B. (2020). Is language awareness supported by grammar lessons, indirect and metalinguistic feedback? An examination of graduate students' writing across drafts. rEFLections, 27(1), 1-21.

Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2020). Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 527-540.

Montgomery, J. L., & Baker, W. (2007). Teacher-written feedback: Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(2), 82-99.

Ng, L. L., & Ishak, S. N. A. (2018). Instructor's direct and indirect feedback: How do they impact learners' written performance? 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(3), 95-110.

Okuda, T. (2020). The writing center and international students in a Japanese university: A language management perspective. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(4), 778-791.

Orland-Barak, L. (2005). Portfolios as evidence of mentors' learning: What remains "untold". Educational Research, 47(1), 25-44.

Orland‐Barak, L. (2009). Unpacking variety in practitioner inquiry on teaching and teacher education. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 111-119.

Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2013). The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners' explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 286-306.

Sutton, P. (2012). Conceptualizing feedback literacy: knowing, being, and acting. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(1), 31-40.

Tan, K. E., & Manochphinyo, A. (2017). Improving grammatical accuracy in Thai learners' writing: Comparing direct and indirect written corrective feedback. Journal of Asia TEFL, 14(3), 430-442.

Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327-369.

Wei, W., & Cao, Y. (2020). Written corrective feedback strategies employed by university English lecturers: A teacher cognition perspective. SAGE Open, 10(3).

Willey, I., & Tanimoto, K. (2013). "Convenience editors" as legitimate participants in the practice of scientific editing: An interview study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 23-32.

Yu, S. (2020). Giving genre-based peer feedback in academic writing: sources of knowledge and skills, difficulties and challenges. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-18.

Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing, 37, 13-24.

Zukas, M., & Malcolm, J. (2019). Reassembling academic work: A sociomaterial investigation of academic learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 41(3), 259-276.

How to Cite
Loo, D. B. (2021). Am I Promoting Feedback Cycle and Sociomaterial Learning?. Issues in Language Studies, 10(1), 1-19.