The Sexist Occupational Representation in English Textbooks of Iranian High schools

Keywords

Gender
occupational roles
sexism
stereotypical occupations

How to Cite

Bahman, M. (2020). The Sexist Occupational Representation in English Textbooks of Iranian High schools. Issues in Language Studies, 9(2), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.2431.2020

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate the occupational roles assigned to women and men in three volumes of English textbooks of Iranian high schools (Birjandi, Soheili, Nowruzi, & Mahmoodi, 2006) using Hartman and Judd’s (1978) framework. The results of the inferential and descriptive analyses demonstrated that these textbooks were 99% sexist in regards to occupational roles as men were depicted in high-status jobs, but women were represented in low-status jobs. In addition, men were manifested in a greater range of occupations than women.

                                                                                                                                       

                                 

                    

 

https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.2431.2020

References

Ahour, T., & Zaferani, P. (2016). A critical visual analysis of gender representation of ELT materials from a multimodal perspective. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(18), 78-98.

Amini, M., & Birjandi, P. (2012). Gender bias in the Iranian high school EFL textbooks. English Language Teaching, 5(2), 134-147.

https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n2p134

Bahman, M. (2008). Gender representation in EFL materials: An analysis of English textbooks of Iranian high schools (Unpublished master's thesis). Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.

Bahman, M., & Rahimi, A. (2010). Gender representation in EFL materials: An analysis of English textbooks of Iranian high schools. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 273-277.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.149

Birjandi, P., Soheili, A., Nowruzi, M., & Mahmoodi, G. H. (2006) English book (Vols. 1, 2 & 3). Tehran: Printing and Publishing Company of Iran Textbooks.

Cocoradă, E. (2018). Gender stereotypes in school textbooks. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 10(4), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/73

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/73

Emilia, E., Moecharam, N. Y., & Syifa, I. L. (2017). Gender in EFL classroom: Transitivity analysis in English textbooks for Indonesian students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 206-214.

https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i1.6877

Farooq, M. U. (1999). Examining sexism in an EFL textbook. Retrieved from http://www.cels.bham.ac.uk/resources/essays/farooq6.pdf

Ghajarieh, A., & Salimi, A. (2016). Gendered representations of male and female social actors in Iranian educational materials. Gender Issues, 33, 258-270.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-016-9157-6

Hall, M. (2014). Gender representation in current EFL textbooks in Iranian secondary schools. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(2), 253-261.

https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.2.253-261

Hamid, B. A., Yuen, C. K., Othman, Z., Yasin, M. S. M., & Baharuddin, J. H. (2013). A corpus-based investigation of gender stereotyping and linguistic sexism in Qatari primary school science textbooks. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 21(S), 197-218.

Harashima, H. D. (2005). Sexual bias in an EFL textbook: A case study. In K. Bradford-Watts, C. Ikeguchi & M. Swanson (Eds.), JALT 2004 Conference proceedings (pp. 1005-1011). Tokyo: JALT.

Hartman, P. L., & Judd, E. L. (1978). Sexism and TESOL materials. TESOL Quarterly, 12(4), 383-393.

https://doi.org/10.2307/3586137

Hellinger, M. (1980). For men must work, and women must weep: Sexism in English language textbooks used in German schools. In C. Kramerae (Ed.), The voices and words of women and men (pp. 267-274). New York: Pergamon Press.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-0685(80)92323-4

Hellinger, M., & Bubmann, H. (2002). Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men. In M. Hellinger & H. Bubmann (Eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men (pp. 2-25). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.10

Higgins, P. J., & Shoar-Ghaffari, P. (1991). Sex-role socialization in Iranian textbooks. NWSA Journal, 3(2), 213-232.

Kobia, J. M. (2009). Femininity and masculinity in English primary school textbooks in Kenya. The International Journal of Language Society and Culture. Retrieved from http://www.educ.utas.edu.au/users/tle/JOURNAL/28-6.pdf

Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and women's place. New York: Harper and Row.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000051

Lee, J. F. K. (2014). A hidden curriculum in Japanese EFL textbooks: Gender representation. Linguistics and Education, 27, 39-53.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.07.002

Mills, S. (1995). Feminist stylistic. London: Routledge.

Mir‐Hosseini, Z. (2006). Muslim women's quest for equality: Between Islamic law and feminism. Critical Inquiry, 32(4), 587-601.

https://doi.org/10.1086/508085

Otlowski, M. (2003). Ethnic diversity and gender bias in EFL textbooks. Asian EFL Journal, 5(2), 1-9. Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/june_03_mo.p

Pauwels, A. (1998). Women changing language. London: Longman.

Porreca, K. L. (1984). Sexism in current ESL textbooks. TESOL Quarterly, 18(4), 705-724.

https://doi.org/10.2307/3586584

Roohani, A., & Zarei, M. (2013). Evaluating gender-bias in the Iranian preuniversity English textbooks. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 115-125.

https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v3i1.194

Sakita, T. I. (1995). Sexism in Japanese English education: A survey of EFL texts. Woman and Language, 18, 5-12.

Salami, A., & Ghajarieh, A. (2016). Culture and gender representation in Iranian school textbooks. Sexuality & Culture, 20, 69-84. doi: 10.1007/s12119-015-9310-5

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9310-5

Sunderland, J. (2006). Language and gender. London: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203456491

Thorne, B., & Henley, N. (1975). An overview of language, gender, and society. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference & dominance (pp. 5-42). Rowley: Newbury.

Thorne, B., Kramarae, C., & Henley, N. (1983). Language, gender and society: Opening a second decade of research. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender and society (pp. 7- 24). Rowley: Newbury.

Vahdatinejad, S., & Hamid, B. A. (2017). Linguistic sexism in the Iranian EFL junior high school textbooks. Journal of Advance Research in Social Science and Humanities (JIAATS), 3(2), 1-19.

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.746761

Weiss, R. P. (2001). Gender biased learning. Training & Development, 55(1), 42-48.

Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal

1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.

2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.

3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.

4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.

5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.

6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.