Timeliness of financial reporting and audit committee effectiveness: evidence from UAE
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Purpose – This study aims to examine the contemporary timeliness of financial reporting in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and the impact of audit committee effectiveness on this timeliness.
Design/Methodology/Approach – Timeliness of financial reporting in this study is measured by audit report lag (ARL), which is the number of days between the date of the financial year end and the date of the audit report. The data from listed companies on the UAE capital markets; Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange (ADX) and Dubai Financial Market (DFM), for three years from 2011 to 2013 resulted in 298 observations. The main statistical techniques of the study are means and multiple regressions.
Findings – The findings show that generally all companies meet the submission deadlines imposed by the two UAE markets. Furthermore, ARL is influenced by audit committee size and profitability, while no evidence is found to support the effect of audit committee expertise, audit committee meetings and firm size on ARL.
Practical Implications – The results of the study show that only audit committee size has a significant influence in reducing ARL. This may be attributed to having minimal variation in the implementation of the Code of Corporate Governance (CCG), particularly audit committee attributes, in the UAE. The results suggest that the current governance by audit committees is adequate to ensure that the financial reports of companies in the UAE are timely. However, except for audit committee size, the other audit committee attributes are unable to further shorten ARL.
Originality/Value –The capital markets in the UAE and its CCG are relatively new. Hence, regulatory requirements may be less stringently implemented by companies in this country. Consequently, timely audited financial reports are demanded by local and international investors to make decisions and alleviate speculation. Thus, determining audit committee attributes that reduce ARL is beneficial to the UAE markets, the listed companies and investors.
Keywords Audit report lag (ARL), Financial reporting timeliness, Audit committee, UAE
Paper Type: Research paper
References
Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2004). "Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory", 23(1), 69-87.
https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2004.23.1.69
Abdullah, S. (2007). "Board composition, audit committee and timeliness of corporate financial reports in Malaysia". Corporate Ownership & Control, 4(2), 33-45.
https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv4i2p3
Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange (ADX). (2016). Guideline concerning listing securities on Abu Dhabi securities exchange. Available at https://www.adx.ae/DocumentCenter/adxdocs/GuidelinesConcerningListingSecuritie s-English.pdf
(accessed on 1 October 2015)
Afify, H. A. E. (2009). "Determinants of audit report lag: does implementing corporate governance have any impact? Empirical evidence from Egypt". Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 10 (1), 56-86.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09675420910963397
Al-Ajmi, J. (2008). Audit and reporting delays: "Evidence from an emerging market". Advances in Accounting, 24(2), 217-226.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2008.08.002
Alkhatib, K., & Marji, Q. (2012). "Audit reports timeliness: empirical evidence from Jordan". Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 1342-1349.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.229
Apadore, K., & Noor, M. M. (2013). "Determinants of audit report lag and corporate governance in Malaysia". International Journal of Business & Management, 8 (15), 151-163.
https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v8n15p151
Balakrishnan, S, M. (2008). "Dubai-a star in the east: a case study in strategic destination branding". Journal of Place Management and Development, 1(1), 62-91.
https://doi.org/10.1108/17538330810865345
Bamber, E. M., Bamber, L.S, & Schoderbek, M. P. (1993). "Audit structure and other determinants of audit report lag: an empirical analysis. Auditing". A Journal of Practice and Theory, 12 (1), 1-23.
Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Lapides, P. D. (2000). "Fraudulent financial reporting: consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms". Accounting Horizons, 14 (4), 441-454.
https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2000.14.4.441
Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Neal, T. L. (2009). "The audit committee oversight process". Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(1), 65-122.
https://doi.org/10.1506/car.26.1.3
Bedard, J., Chtourou, S. M., & Courteau, L. (2004). "The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management". Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23 (2), pp. 13-35.
https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2004.23.2.13
Behn, B.K., Searcy, D.L., & Woodroof, J.B. (2006). "A within firm analysis of current and expected future audit lag determinants". Journal of Information Systems, 20(1), 65-86.
https://doi.org/10.2308/jis.2006.20.1.65
Carcello, J., Hollingsworth, C., Klein, A., & Neal, T. (2006). Audit committee financial expertise, competing corporate governance mechanisms and earnings management. Working paper. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? (accessed on 23 February 2016)
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.887512
Dubai Financial Market (DFM). (2016). Listing Requirements: Equity. Available at http://www.dfm.ae /issuers/listing-requirements/equity
Goh, B. (2009). Audit committees, boards of directors, and remediation of material weaknesses in internal control. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(2), 549-579.
https://doi.org/10.1506/car.26.2.9
Fama, E. F. (1980). "Agency problems and the theory of the firm". Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 228-307.
https://doi.org/10.1086/260866
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). "Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and capital structure". Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Harjoto, M. A., Laksmana, I., & Lee, R. (2015). "The impact of demographic characteristics of CEOs and directors on audit fees and audit delay". Managerial Auditing Journal, 30 (8/9), 963-997.
https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-01-2015-1147
Ika, S. R. (2011). The Impact of audit committee effectiveness on timeliness of reporting: Indonesian Evidence (Unpublished Master's thesis). Kulliyyah of Economics and Management Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia.
Ika, S. R., & Ghazali, N. A. M. (2012). "Audit committee effectiveness and timeliness of reporting: Indonesian evidence". Managerial Auditing Journal, 27(4), 403-424.
https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901211217996
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (2010). The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting 2010. Available at https://dart.deloitte.com/resource/1/7036afd8-3f7e-11e6-95db-2d5b01548a21(accessed on 21 April 2015).
Kent, P., Routledge, J., & Stewart, J. (2010). "Innate and discretionary accruals quality and corporate governance". Accounting & Finance, 50(1), 171-195.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2009.00321.x
Khansaheb, A. (2008). Internationalization of Family Businesses in UAE (Doctoral dissertation) British University in Dubai.
Leventis, S., Weetman, P., & Caramanis, C. (2005). "Determinants of audit report lag: Some evidence from Athens stock exchange. International Journal of Auditing", 9(1), 45-58.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2005.00101.x
Madaschi, A. (2010). On Corporate Governance: Ownership Concentration and Firm Performance in Italy (Unpublished Master's thesis), Copenhagen Business School.
Mangena, M., & Pike, R. (2005). "The effect of audit committee shareholding, financial expertise and size on interim financial disclosures". Accounting and Business Research, 35(4), 327-349.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2005.9729998
Mohamad-Nor, M, N., Rohami, S., & Wan-Hussin, W. N. (2010). "Corporate governance and audit report lag in Malaysia". Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 6(2), 57-84.
Naimi, M., Nor, M., Rohami, S., & Wan-Hussin, W. N. (2010). "Corporate governance and audit report lag in Malaysia". Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 6(2), 57-84.
Nelson, S. P., & Shukeri, S. N. (2011). "Corporate governance and audit report timeliness: evidence from Malaysia". Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies, 1(11), 109-127.
https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3563(2011)0000011010
Owusu-Ansah, S. (2000). "Timeliness of corporate financial reporting in emerging capital markets: Empirical evidence from the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange". Accounting and Business Research, 30(3), 241−254.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2000.9728939
Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows (Versions 10 and 11): SPSS Student Version 11.0 for Windows. Milton Keynes, UK, USA: Open University Press.
Pucheta-Martínez, M., & De Fuentes, C. (2007). "The impact of audit committee characteristics on the enhancement of the quality of financial reporting: an empirical study in the Spanish context". Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1394-1412.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00653.x
Saleh, N., Iskandar, T., & Rahmat, M. (2007). Audit committee characteristics and earnings management: evidence from Malaysia. Asian Review of Accounting, 15(2), 147-163.
https://doi.org/10.1108/13217340710823369
Sharma, V., Naiker, V., & Lee, B. (2009). "Determinants of audit committee meeting frequency: Evidence from a voluntary governance system". Accounting Horizons, 23(3), 245-263.
https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2009.23.3.245
Song, J., & Windram, B. (2004). "Benchmarking audit committee effectiveness in financial reporting". International Journal of Auditing, 8(3), 195-205.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2004.00090.x
Stewart, J., & Munro, L. (2007). "The impact of audit committee existence and audit committee meeting frequency on the external audit: Perceptions of Australian auditors". International Journal of Auditing, 11(1), 51-69.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2007.00356.x
Xie, B., Davidson, W. N., & DaDalt, P. J. (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance: The role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(3), 295-316.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(02)00006-8
Zhang, Y., Zhou, J., & Zhou, N. (2007). "Audit committee quality, auditor independence, and internal control weaknesses". Journal of accounting and public policy, 26(3), 300-327.
Copyright (c) 2018 UNIMAS Review of Accounting and Finance
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
