The Impact Of Corporate Governance on The Financial Performance in Malaysia
The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between corporate governance and firm financial performance in Malaysia. This study is mainly focusing on four sections of corporate governance which are board independent, board size, the frequency of audit committee meeting and firm size. The population of this study is Top 30 firms in Malaysia that are public listed in Bursa Malaysia while for the period, this study focusses on year 2016 to 2019 which is 4 years. This study uses Return on Assets (ROA) to measure the firm effectiveness and efficiency. As for statistical analysis, this study uses E-View to run all the test such as Breusch-Godfrey Serial Correlation LM Test, Hausman Test, Ordinary Least Squared (OLS) method, Autocorrelation, Multicollinearity and Normality Test. According to the results of the analysis, board independent has positive insignificant relationship with firm performances while board size and firm performances have negative and insignificant relationship. As for the frequency of audit committee meeting and firm size, the results display that both variables have negatively significant relationship with the performances of the firm. Apart from that this study use two theory which are Prospect Theory and Agency Theory.
Abatecola G, Caputo A, Mari M, Poggesi S (2012). Relations among corporate governance, codes of conduct, and the profitability of public utilities: an empirical study of companies on the Italian stock exchange. Int J Manag 29(2):611–626
Abdullah, S. N. (2006a). Board composition, audit committee and timeline of corporate financial reports in Malaysia. Journal of Corporate Ownership & Control, 4(2), 33-45.
Aboagye, A.Q., and Otieku, J. (2010). Are Ghanian MFIs’ performance associated with corporate governance? Corporate Governance, 10(3), 307-320.
Akbas, H.E., Karaduman, H.A. (2012), The effect of firm size on profitability: An empirical investigation on Turkish manufacturing companies. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, (55), 21-27.
Allen, F., & Gale, D. (2001). Comparing financial systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Al-Matari, E. M., Al-Swidi, A. K., Fadzil, F. H. & Al-Matari, Y. A. (2012). The impactof board characteristics on firm performance: Evidence from nonfinancial listed companies in Kuwaiti Stock Exchange. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 2(2), 310.
Arif, A. M., Ibrahim, M. K. and Othman, R. (2007). Determinants of firm level governance: Malaysian evidence. Corporate Governance, 7, 5. Asian Development Outlook. (2004). Oxford University Press Inc., London.
Awan, S. H. (2012). Effect on board composition on firm performance: A case of Pakistan listed companies. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(10).
Baliga, B., Moyer, C. and Rao, R. (1996), “CEO duality and firm performance: what’s the fuss?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 41-53.
Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., and Ferrell, A. (2004). What matters in corporate governance? Working paper. Harvard Law School, USA.
Bernasconi, M. (1998). Tax evasion and orders of risk aversion. Journal of Public Economics, 67, 123-134
Bonazzi, L., & Islam, S. M. N. (2007). Agency theory and corporate governance: A study of the effectiveness of board in their monitoring of the CEO. Journal of Modelling in Management, 2(1), 7–23.
Bromiley, P. (1991). Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 37-59.
Burke L, Logsdon JM, Mitchell W, Reiner M, Vogel D. (1986). Corporate community involvement in the San Francisco Bay Area. Calif Manag Rev XXVIII (3):122–141.
Bushee, B., Carter, M. E., Gerakos, J. (2007). Institutional investor preferences for corporate governance mechanisms. Wharton Financial Institutions Center Working Paper Series.
Christensen, J., Kent, P., & Stewart, J. (2010). Corporate governance and company performance in Australia. Australian Accounting Review, 20(4), 372–386.
Clarke, T. (2007). International corporate governance. A comparative approach. London, England: Routledge.
Cleassens, S., Djankov, S. and Xu, L. C. (2000). Corporate performance in the East Asian financial crisis. The World Bank Research Observer, 15, 23-46.
Dar, L., Naseem, M. A., Niazi, G. S. K. & Rehman, R. U. (2011). Corporate governance and firm performance: A case study of Pakistan oil and gas companies listed in Karachi stock exchange. Global journal of management and business research, 11(8).
Devi, A., Devi, S. (2014), Determinants of firms’ profitability in Pakistan. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(19), 87-91.
Dhami, S. (2007). Why do people pay taxes? prospect theory versus expected utility theory. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 64, 171-192.
Dogan, M. (2013), Does firm size firm profitability affect? Evidence from Turkey. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(4), 53-59.
Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64.
Ehikioya, B. I. (2009). Corporate governance structure and firm performance in developing economies: Evidence from Nigeria. The International Journal of Business in Society, 9(3), 231–243.
Elsayed, K. (2007). “Does CEO duality affect corporate performance?”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, Vol. 15 No. 6, pp. 1203-1214.
Evans, J., Evans, R. and Loh, S. (2002). Corporate governance and declining firm performance. International Journal of Business Studies, 10, 1-18.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–3025.
Freeman, R. E. (1983). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Advances in Strategic Management, 1(1), 31–60.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.G.
Frost, J. (2019). Statistics By Jim. Making statistics intuitive.
Madan Mohan, Marimuthu. (2015). “A Study on The Impact of Corporate Governance on Financial Performance”-ICTACT Journal on Management Studies, ISSN Online (2395-1664), And Volume: 01, Issue: 01.
Gillan, S. L. (2006). Recent development in corporate governance: An overview. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 381–402.
Haniffa, R. M. and Hudaib, M. (2006). Corporate governance structure and performance of Malaysian listed companies. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 33(7), 1034-1062. https://ajssr.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41180-018-0020-4#Tab3
Jensen, C. M., & Meckling, H. W. (1976). Theory of firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Jensen, M. C. (1986). "Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers." The American economic review 76(2): 323-329.
Jensen, M.C. (1986). “Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers”, American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 76 No. 2, pp. 323-329.
Johnson, S. (1997). “An empirical analysis of the determinants of corporate debt ownership structure”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 47-69.
Karpoff, J. M. (2001). The impact of shareholder activism on target companies: A survey of empirical findings. University of Washington Working Paper Series.
Khoo, B. Y. (2003). Corporate governance in Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.adb.org/Publications/.
Kyle, A.S., Ou-Yang, H., & Xiong, W. (2006). Prospect theory and liquidation decisions. Journal of Economics Theory, 129, 273-288.
La Porta, R., Florencio, L., and Shleifer, A. (2002). Government ownership of banks. Journal of Finance, 57, 265-301.
Levrau, A. and Van den Berghe, L. A. A. (2007). Corporate governance and board effectiveness: Beyond formalism. ICFAI Journal of Corporate Governance, 6(4),58-85.
Liew, P. K. (2006). The perceived roles of corporate governance reforms in Malaysia: The view of corporate practitioners. University of Essex, No. 06- 02, 25. Retrieved from http://www.essex.ac.uk.
Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The business lawyer, 59-77.
Mallin, C. A. (2016). Corporate governance (5th ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Masood Fooladi Chaghadari. (2011). “Corporate Governance and Firm Performance”-International Conference on Sociality and Economics Development IPEDR vol.10 IACSIT Press, Singapore.
Michaelas, N., Chittenden, F. and Poutziouris, P. (1999). “Financial policy and capital structure choice in UK SMEs: empirical evidence from company panel data”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 113-130.
Mohd. Yameen, Izhar Ahmad. (2015). “Impact of Corporate Governance Practices on Financial Performance of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited”-International Journal of Advancements in Research & Technology, ISSN 2278-7763, Volume 4, Issue 2.
Myers, S. C., and Majluf, N.S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics 13, 187-221.
Nickell, S. and Nicolitsas, D. (1999). “How does financial pressure affect firms?” European Economic Review, Vol. 43 No. 8, pp. 1435-1456.
Parker, S., Peters, G.F. and Turetsky, H.F. (2002). “Corporate governance and corporate failure: a survival analysis”, Corporate Governance: International Journal of Business in Society, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 4-12.
Pathan, S., & Skully, M. (2010). Endogenously structured boards of directors in Banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(7), 1590-1606.
Prasanjaya, A.A.Y., Ramantha, I.W. (2013), Analysis of CAR, ROA, LDR, and company size to profitability bank listed on the stock exchange. E-Journal of Accounting University of Udayana, 4(1), 230-245.
Rebeiz, K. and Salameh, Z. (2006). Relationship between governance structure and financial performance in construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 22,20-26.
Reddy, K., Locke, S., and Scrimgeour, F. (2010). The efficacy of principle-based corporate governance practices and firm financial performance: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 6(3), 190-219.
Renders, A., Gaeremynck, A., and Sercu, P. (2010). Corporate governance ratings and company performance: A Cross-European study. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(2), 87-106
Rieger, M. O. & Wang, M. (2006). Cumulative prospect theory and the St. Petersburg paradox. Economic Theory, 28, 665-679.
Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. (2016). Social responsibility and financial performance: The role of good corporate governance. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(2), 137–151.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. (2002). Public Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act, United States Federal Law.
Shimizu, K. (2007). Prospect theory, behavioural theory, and the threat-rigidity thesis: combinative effects on organizational decisions to divest formerly acquired units. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1495-1514.
Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(June), 737-783.
Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (2002). The relationship between corporate governance and financial performance: An empirical study. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 8(4), 35–48.
Turnbull, S. (1997). Corporate governance: Its scope, concerns and theories. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 5(4), 180–205.
Van Ees, H., van der Laan, G. and Postma, T. J. B. M. (2008). Effective board behaviour in The Netherlands. European Management Journal, 26(2), 84-93.
Velnampy, P. T. (2013). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Study of Sri Lankan Manufacturing Companies. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Devel.
Wallison,P. J.(2006). All the Rage: Will Independent Directors Produce Good Corporate Governance? American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
Wang, Y. & Oliver, J. (2009). Board composition and firm performance variance: Australian evidence. Accounting Research Journal Vol. 22 No. 2, 2009 pp. 196-212 opment, 4(3), 228–236.
Williams, R., Fadil, P., & Armstong, R. (2005). Top management team tenure and corporate illegal activity: The moderating influence of board size. Journal of Managerial Issues, 17(4), 479–493.
Zulfikar, R., & STp, M. M. (2019). Estimation model and selection method of panel data regression: an overview of common effect, fixed effect, and random effect model.
Copyright (c) 2021 UNIMAS Review of Accounting and Finance
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.