PUBLIC BUDGET RATCHETING: DO MALAYSIA FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES ADJUST THEIR BUDGETS BASED ON EXPENDITURE VARIANCES?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/uraf.289.2016Keywords:
Budget Ratcheting, Expenditure VariancesAbstract
Public budget is an important role in achieving a country’s economic and social development goals. It essentially requires that an entire government budget be managed effectively and efficiently to ensure attainment of those goals as well as well-being of the citizens. Therefore, it is necessary to examine government spending behaviour and the process of budget preparation. This study looks into the relationship between changes in current budget and expenditure variances, in particular, operating expenditure of the Malaysia federal government. The influence of expenditure variances (overspending/ under spending) on current budget changes is examined to determine if prior year expenditure variances cause non-symmetry changes in current budget so as to identify the presence of budget ratcheting. Dynamic Panel Regression Analysis is used to examine the data from forty four government agencies/programs, covering the period from 2010 until 2014. The findings reveal that there is a significant positive association between changes in current budget with prior year overspending by agency/program. However, the relationship between changes in current budget with prior year underspending by agency/program is not significant. The contribution of the research highlights that the presence of budget ratcheting among the federal government agencies/programs of public organisations needs to be indicated to enhance budget administration regarding ratcheting.
References
Allen, R., & Tommasi, D. (Eds.) (2001). Managing public expenditure: A reference book for transition countries. Paris, France: OECD.
https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264192607-en
Anderson, M., Banker, R., & Janakiraman, S. (2003). Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs "Sticky"? Journal Of Accounting Research, 41(1), 47-63.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00095
Anessi-Pessina, E., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2012). Budgeting and Rebudgeting in Local Governments: Siamese Twins? Public Administration Review, 72(6), 875-884.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02590.x
Aranda, C., Arellano, J., & Davila, A. (2014). Ratcheting and the role of relative target setting. Accounting Review, 89(4), 1197-1226. doi:10.2308/accr-50733.
https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50733
Balakrishnan, R., & Gruca, T. S. (2008). Cost Stickiness and Core Competency: A Note. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4), 993-1006.
https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.4.2
Bellante, D., & Porter, P. (1998). Public and Private Employment Over the Business Cycle: A Ratchet Theory of Government Growth. Journal Of Labor Research, 19(4), 613-628.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-998-1052-9
Bevan, G., & Hood, C. (2006). What's measured is what matters: Targets and gaming in the English public health care system. Public Administration, 84(3), 517-538. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00600.x.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00600.x
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
Broyles, R. W., Khaliq, A. A., & Mattachione, S. E. (2009). A variance analysis of the contribution margin: An approach to improving financial performance and reducing fiscal risk. Research In Healthcare Financial Management, 12(1), 77-92.
Casas-Pardo, J., & Puchades-Navarro, M. (2001). A critical comment on Niskanen's model. Public Choice, 107(1/2), 147-167.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010370708105
Cassar, G., & Gibson, B. (2008). Budgets, internal reports, and manager forecast accuracy. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(3), 707-738. doi:10.1506/car.25.3.3.
https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.3.3
Conybeare, J. A. (1984). Bureaucracy, monopoly, and competition: A critical analysis of the budget-maximizing model of bureaucracy. American Journal Of Political Science, 28(3), 479.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2110901
Devarajan, S., Swaroop, V., & Zou, H. F. (1996). The composition of public expenditure and economic growth. Journal of monetary economics, 37(2), 313-344.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(96)90039-2
Doh, J. C. (1991). Expenditure forecasting in selected operating departments in three states of Malaysia. Public Budgeting & Finance, 11(2), 108-119
https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5850.00904
Ekholm, B., & Wallin, J. (2000). Is the annual budget really dead?. European Accounting Review, 9(4), 519. doi:10.1080/09638180020024007
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180020024007
Ettredge, M. L., Bedard, J. C., & Johnstone, K. M. (2008). Empirical tests of audit budget dynamics. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 20(2), 1-18
https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2008.20.2.1
Hercowitz, Z., & Strawczynski, M. (2004). Cyclical ratcheting in government spending: Evidence from the OECD. Review Of Economics & Statistics, 86(1), 353-361.
https://doi.org/10.1162/003465304323023868
Higgs, R. (1987). Crisis and Leviathan: Critical episodes in the growth of American government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holthausen, R., Larcker, D., & Sloan, R. (1995). Annual bonus schemes and the manipulation of earnings. Journal Of Accounting And Economics, 19(1), 29-74. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(94)00376-G.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(94)00376-G
Indjejikian, R. J., Matějka, M., & Schloetzer, J. D. (2014). Target ratcheting and incentives: Theory, evidence, and new opportunities. Accounting Review, 89(4), 1259-1267. doi:10.2308/accr-50745.
https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50745
Indjejikian, R., & Nanda, D. (2003). Reply to: Dynamic incentives and responsibility accounting: A comment. Journal Of Accounting And Economics, 35(3), 437-441. doi:10.1016/S0165-4101(03)00041-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(03)00041-7
Jensen, M. C. (2001). Corporate budgeting is broken - Let's fix it. Harvard Business Review, 79(10), 94-101.
Kaplan, R. S. (2010). Conceptual foundations of the balanced scorecard (Working Paper No. 10-074). Retrieved from Harvard Business School website: http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/10-074.pdf.
Kidwell, L. A. (1999). Compliance reporting decisions in municipal audits: The impact of budget variance and employment sector. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 11(3), 326-354.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-11-03-1999-B001
Kloot, L., & Martin, J. (2001). Local government accountability: Explaining differences. Accounting, Accountability & Performance, 7(1), 51-72.
Lee, T. M., & Plummer, E. (2007). Budget adjustments in response to spending variances: Evidence of ratcheting of local government expenditures. Journal of Management accounting research, 19(1), 137-167.
https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar.2007.19.1.137
Leone, A. J., & Rock, S. (2002). Empirical tests of budget ratcheting and its effect on managers' discretionary accrual choices. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(1), 43-67.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00044-1
Marcino, G. R. (2000). Obliterate traditional budgeting. Financial Executive, 16(6), 29-31.
Marginson, D., Ogden, S., & Frow, N. (2006). Budgeting and innovation: Complements or contradictions?. Retrieved May 13, 2015, from CIMA website: http://prelivewww.cimaglobal.com/Documents/Thought_leadership_docs/MigratedDocsMarch2010/Resouces%20(pdfs)/Research%20full%20reports/Budgeting%20and%20innovation%20complements%20or%20contradictions.pdf.
Marino, A. M., & Matsusaka, J. G. (2005). Decision processes, agency problems, and information: An economic analysis of capital budgeting procedures. The Review of Financial Studies, 18(1), 301-325. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhh005.
https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhh005
McGuire, T. G. (1981). Budget-maximizing governmental agencies: An empirical test. Public Choice, 36(2), 313-322.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123787
McNabb, D. E. (2002). Research methods in public administration and nonprofit management: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Armonk, New York : M.E. Sharpe.
Migué, J., & Bélanger, G. (1974). Toward a general theory of managerial discretion. Public Choice, 1727-47.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718995
Miller, D. C. (1991). Handbook of research design and social measurement (5th ed.). Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.
Nasaruddin Arshad, & Zulkifly Mustapha. (1988). Malaysian government expenditure: An analysis of pattern and probable distribution impact. Analisis, 3(1&2), 23-36.
Otley, D., & Fakiolas, A. (2000). Reliance on accounting performance measures: dead end or new beginning?. Accounting, Organizations And Society, 25497-510. doi:10.1016/S0361-3682(98)00007-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(98)00007-5
Penner, S. J. (2004). Controlling budget variance. Nursing Homes: Long Term Care Management, 53(10), 86-88.
Perrin, B. (2015). Bringing accountability up to date with the realities of public sector management in the 21st century. Canadian Public Administration, 58(1), 183-203. doi:10.1111/capa.12107.
https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12107
Phadoongsitthi, M. (2003). The role of managerial accounting in emerging economies: An empirical study of Thailand. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, 2003). Retrieved May 13, 2015, from Thammasat University website: http://dspace.library.tu.ac.th/handle/3517/2060.
Pollack, R. N. (2014). Financial Management for Firms: Accounting, Billing, and Budgeting. Contract, 55(5), 34.
Ratchet. (2015). In Oxford English dictionary online. Retrieved May 12, 2015, from http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/ratchet.
Robbins, W., & Taylor, G. (2013). Management accounting systems adoption: Evidence and performance implications for the nonprofit healthcare sector. International Research Journal of Applied Finance, 4(8), 939-1079.
Robinson, M. (2002). Financial control in Australian government budgeting. Public Budgeting & Finance, 22(1), 80-93.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5850.00067
Roland, G. (2013). Private and public ownership in economic theory. In G. Roland (Ed.), Privatization: Successes and failures (pp. 9-31). New York: Columbia University Press.
https://doi.org/10.7312/rola14160-003
Roland, G., & Szafarz, A. (1990). The ratchet effect and the planner's expectations. European Economic Review, 34(5), 1079-1098. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(90)90024-S.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(90)90024-S
Schmidt, J. A. (1992). Is it time to replace traditional budgeting?. Journal Of Accountancy, 174(4), 103-107
Sigelman, L. (1986). The bureaucrat as budget maximizer: An assumption examined. Public Budgeting & Finance, 6(1), 50-59
https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5850.00706
Smyth, R. (2004). Exploring the usefulness of a conceptual framework as a research tool: A researcher's reflections. Issues In Educational Research, 14(2), 167-180. http://www.iier.org.au/iier14/smyth.html
Stonkutė, E., & Žukaskas, P. (2003). Management control system's design: Theoretical concepts. Management Of Organizations: Systematic Research, (25), 273-286
Tirole, J. (1994). The Internal Organization of Government. Oxford Economic Papers, 46(1), 1-29
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a042114
Trebby, J. P., & Daniker, R. P. V. (1986). Relationship of budgeting and accounting: Implication for public policy. Journal of Applied Business Research, 2(4), 23-32
https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v2i4.6555
Van der Hoek, M. P. (2005). From cash to accrual budgeting and accounting in the public sector: The Dutch experience. Public Budgeting & Finance, 25(1), 32-45
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0275-1100.2005.00353.x
Vasarhelyi, M. A., & Mock, T. J. (1977). An information processing analysis of budget variance information. (Unpublished papers). University of California, United States. Retrieved May 14, 2015, from http://www.business.rutgers.edu/sites/default/files/user_files/cv-miklos-vasarhelyi.pdf
Webb, R. A. (2002). The impact of reputation and variance investigations on the creation of budget slack. Accounting, Organizations And Society, 27361-378. doi:10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00034-4
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00034-4
Weitzman, M. L. (1980). The "ratchet principle" and performance incentives. Bell Journal of Economics, 11(1), 302-208
https://doi.org/10.2307/3003414
Wooldridge, S., Garvin, M., & Miller, J. (2001). Effects of accounting and budgeting on capital allocation for infrastructure projects. Journal Of Management In Engineering, 17(2), 86-94. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2001)17:2(86)
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2001)17:2(86)
Yap, A. K. H., Lee, T. H., Jamaliah Said, & Yap, S. T. (2013). Adoption, benefits and challenges of strategic, management accounting practices: Evidence from emerging market. Asia Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 8(2), 27-45
Yeoh, M., & Stansel, D. (2013). Is public expenditure productive? Evidence from the manufacturing sector in U.S. cities, 1880-1920. CATO Journal, 33(1), 1-28
Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2012). Business Research Methods (9th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
