The Effects of Background Music on The Screen-Based Reading Material Among University Students: An Eye Tracking Study
Abstract
Reading performance is a crucial skill that can predict success in education. Many factors can influence reading performances, such as background music and perceiving the sentences while reading. This study explores the effects of music on screen-based reading materials among health sciences university students. One hundred twelve participants from The National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur Campus, participated in this study. Participants were asked to read and understand the general theme text given on the computer screen. The participants were segregated into two groups according to their preferred way of reading, either music or non-music. Then, participants in the music group randomly listened to rap or classic music (rap = 86 BPM or classic = 161 BPM) using a Sony headphone (MDR-XB450AP) while reading. The reading duration was recorded, and reading comprehension was determined by the correct answers to four questions based on the text. A webcam-based GazeRecorder software was used to measure the eye-tracking metrics (dwell time, first view time, and number of AOI views) on the area of interest (AOI). Reading speed is significantly associated with reading comprehension (rs = -0.1933, p = 0.0412). Reading duration, reading speed, and reading comprehension were not considerably different while listening to and not listening to music. The results show a similar pattern in all eye-tracking metrics. However, the reading duration while listening to rap music (2.68 ± 1.94 minutes) was significantly shorter (U = 299.5, p = 0.02642) compared to classical music (3.42 ± 1.91 minutes). Moreover, reading speed is significantly higher (U = 299.5, p = 0.02642) while listening to rap music (139.38 ± 102.96 wpm) as compared to classical music (109.47 ± 51.51 wpm). Music seems not to affect reading performance and eye-tracking metrics. Despite this, rap music can improve reading performance by reducing the reading duration and increasing reading speed.
References
Anderson, S.A. & Fuller, G.B. (2010). Effect of music on reading comprehension of junior high school students. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(3) 178-187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021213.
Batemanazan, V., Jaafar, A. & Salehuddin, K. (2014). A Comparative study on the eye movement patterns in Malay-English bilingual readers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 229-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.031.
Bell, T.I. (2001). Extensive reading: speed and comprehension. The Reading Matrix, 1(1). http://www.readingmatrix.com.
Boudjella, A., Sharma, M., Sharma, D. (2017). Non-native English speaker readability metric: reading speed and comprehension. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 5(6). 1257-1268. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2017.56107.
Bugter, D. & Carden, R.J. (2012). The effect of music genre on a memory task. Modern Psychological Studies, 17(2), 87-90.
Cauchard, F., Cane, J. & Weger, U. (2012). Influence of background speech and music in interrupted reading: an eye-tracking study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(3), 381-390. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1837.
Chen, Q. & Yan, Z. (2016). Does multitasking with mobile phones affect learning? A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.047.
Clifton, C., Ferreira, F., Henderson, J.M., Inhoff, A.W., Liversedge, S.P., Reichle, E.D. & Schotter, E.R. (2016). Eye movements in reading and information processing: Keith Rayner's 40-year legacy. Journal of Memory and Language, 86, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.07.004.
Dickmann, F., Edler, D., Bestgen, A.K. & Kuchinke, L. (2015). Heatmap analysis in eye-tracking research-the- the example of investigating object-location memory. Kartographische Nachrichten, 65(5,) 272-280.
Hessels, R.S., Kemner, C., van den Boomen, C. & Hooge, I.T.C. (2016). The area-of-interest problem in eye-tracking research: a noise-robust solution for face and sparse stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1694-1712. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0676-y.
Johansson, R., Holmqvist, K., Mossberg, F. & Lindgren, M. (2011). Eye movements and reading comprehension while listening to preferred and non-preferred study music. Psychology of Music, 40(3), 339-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/03005735610387777.
Josephson, S. (2008). Keeping your readers' eyes on the screen: an eye-tracking study comparing sans serif and serif typefaces. Visual Communication Quarterly, 15(1-2), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551390801914595.
Karapetsa, A.Α., Karapetsas, A.V., Maria, B. & Laskaraki, I.R.M. (2015). The role of music on eating behavior. Encephalos, 52, 59-63. http://www.encephalos.gr/.
Kok, E.M. & Jarodzka, H. (2017). Before your eyes: the value and limitations of eye tracking in medical education. Medical Education, 51(1), 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13066.
Kumar, N., Wajidi, M.A., Chian, Y.T., Vishroothi, S., Ravindra, S. & Aithal, A. (2016). The effect of listening to music on concentration and academic performance of the student: a cross-sectional study on medical undergraduate students. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences, 7, 1190-1195. https://www.rjpbcs.com/.
Mclaughlin, L., Bond, R., Hughes, C., Mcconnell, J. & Mcfadden, S. J. (2017). Computing eye gaze metrics to automatically assess radiographer performance during x-ray image interpretation. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 105, 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.03.001.
Nicholas, A.J. (2020). Preferred Learning Methods of Generation Z. https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1075&context=fac_staff_pub
Pivec, M., Trummer, C. & Pripfl, J. (2006). Eye-tracking adaptable e-learning and content authoring support. Informatica, 30(1), 83-86. .
Rahmat, N., Min, L.S., Sungif, N.A.M., Yusup, F.N.M. (2015). English language proficiency tests and academic achievement: a study on the Malaysian university English test as a predictor of technical program undergraduates academic achievement. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1), 114-119. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.1p.114.
Raschke, M., Blascheck, T. & Burch, M. (2014). Visual analysis of eye tracking data. Handbook of Human Centric Visualization, 391-409. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7485-2_15.
Rayner, K., Schotter, E.R., Masson, M.E.J., Potter, M.C. & Treiman, R. (2016). So much to read, so little time: how do we read, and can speed reading help? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(1), 4-34. htpps://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615623267.
Sahebdel, S. & Khodadust, M. (2014). The effect of background music while silent reading on EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 7(14), 102-119. https://jal.tabriz.iau.ir/.
Salehuddin, K., Shahimin, M.M., Sulaiman, M.Z., & Md Zolkapli, R.B. (2019). Heat maps andscan paths: Qualitative eye tracking evidence on how the Qur’an is memorized throughreading. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 4(2), 318-334.
http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol14iss2pp318-334.
Schäfer, T. & Fachner, J. (2015). Listening to music reduces eye movements. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 77(2), 551-559. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0777-1.
Schimmel, N. & Ness, M. (2017). The effects of oral and silent reading on reading comprehension. Reading Psychology, 38, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2016.1278416.
Schroeder, S., Hyönä, J. & Liversedge, S. (2015). Developmental eye-tracking research in reading: introduction to the special issue. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 500–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1046877.
Seabra, A.G., Dias, N.M., Mecca, T. & Macedo, E.C. (2017). Contribution of word reading speed to reading comprehension in Brazilian children: Does speed matter to the comprehension model? Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 630. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00630.
Zhang, H., Miller, K., Cleveland, R. & Cortina, K. (2018). How Listening to music affects reading: evidence from eye tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory and Cognition, 44(11), 1778–1791. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000544
Copyright (c) 2023 Unimas Publisher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
4) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
5) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
