Exploring Background Noise During Learning: A Neurofeedback Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.5867.2023Keywords:
neurofeedback training, brainwaves, background noise, learningAbstract
Distinguishing effective background noise during learning is crucial for students. This study was conducted to determine the effective noise background during learning. Two healthy female subjects were recruited for this experiment. They were put in separate brainwave recording sessions for learning tasks without noise and with background noise. Their theta and alpha brainwave readings showed higher activity while learning with background noise. The finding indicated that both brainwaves represented insight and alertness were more dominant during active learning tasks than without noise. However, there was no statistically significant difference in both learning conditions for theta (p = 0.09) and alpha (p = 0.07) brainwaves. The higher activity level during the learning process with background noise could be interpreted as a sign of enhanced cognitive insight and alertness. Nonetheless, the magnitude of the difference observed did not reach a statistically significant level, thus necessitating further investigation and analysis.
References
Al-Shargie, F., Tariq, U., Babiloni, F., & Al-Nashash, H. (2021). Cognitive vigilance enhancement using audio stimulation of pure tone at 250 Hz. IEEE Access, 9, 22955-22970. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3054785
Alaros, E., Handayani, D. O. D., Yaacob, H., & Lubis, M. (2021). EEG Neurofeedback Training Among Adult with Attention Deficit: A Review Article. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1077(1), 12061.
Arns, M., Heinrich, H., & Strehl, U. (2014). Evaluation of neurofeedback in ADHD: the long and winding road. Biological Psychology, 95, 108–115.
Awada, M., Becerik-Gerber, B., Lucas, G., & Roll, S. (2022). Cognitive performance, creativity and stress levels of neurotypical young adults under different white noise levels. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 14566.
Boer, J.D., & Krumbholz, K. (2018). Auditory Attention Causes Gain Enhancement and Frequency Sharpening at Successive Stages of Cortical Processing—Evidence from Human Electroencephalography. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30, 785-798.
Bucho, T., Caetano, G., Vourvopoulos, A., Accoto, F., Esteves, I., i Badia, S. B., Rosa, A., & Figueiredo, P. (2019). Comparison of visual and auditory modalities for Upper-Alpha EEG-Neurofeedback. 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 5960–5966.
Caviola, S., Visentin, C., Borella, E., Mammarella, I., & Prodi, N. (2021). Out of the noise: Effects of sound environment on maths performance in middle-school students. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 73, 101552. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP.2021.101552.
Ciccarelli, G., Federico, G., Mele, G., Di Cecca, A., Migliaccio, M., Ilardi, C. R., Alfano, V., Salvatore, M., & Cavaliere, C. (2023). Simultaneous real-time EEG-fMRI neurofeedback: A systematic review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 17, 1123014.
Da Silva, J. C., & De Souza, M. L. (2021). Neurofeedback Training for Cognitive Performance Improvement in Healthy Subjects: A Systematic Review. Psychology and Neuroscience, 14(3), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000261
Dockrell, J. E., & Shield, B. M. (2006). Acoustical barriers in classrooms: the impact of noise on performance in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920600635494
Domingos, C., da Silva Caldeira, H., Miranda, M., Melício, F., Rosa, A. C., & Pereira, J. G. (2021). The Influence of Noise in the Neurofeedback Training Sessions in Student Athletes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413223
Ede, F., Szebényi, S., & Maris, E. (2014). Attentional modulations of somatosensory alpha, beta, and gamma oscillations dissociate between anticipation and stimulus processing. NeuroImage, 97, 134-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.047.
Gordon-Hickey, S., & Lemley, T. (2012). Background noise acceptance and personality factors involved in library environment choices by college students. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(6), 365–369.
Herweg, N., Solomon, E., & Kahana, M. (2020). Theta Oscillations in Human Memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24, 208-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.006.
Holtmann, M., Sonuga-Barke, E., Cortese, S., & Brandeis, D. (2014). Neurofeedback for ADHD: a review of current evidence. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics, 23(4), 789–806.
Jebelli, H., Hwang, S., & Lee, S. (2018). EEG signal-processing framework to obtain high-quality brain waves from an off-the-shelf wearable EEG device. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 32(1), 4017070.
Jeon, M.-K., & Oh, J.-W. (2019). Study on Listening to White Noise of Nursing College Students and Improvement of Concentration. Medico-Legal Update, 19(1), 304-309
Ke, J., Du, J., & Luo, X. (2021). The effect of noise content and level on cognitive performance measured by electroencephalography (EEG). Automation in Construction, 130, 103836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103836
Kim, S., Emory, C., & Choi, I. (2021). Neurofeedback Training of Auditory Selective Attention Enhances Speech-In-Noise Perception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.676992
Klimesch, W., Fellinger, R., & Freunberger, R. (2011). Alpha oscillations and early stages of visual encoding. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 118. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00118
Marzbani, H., Marateb, H. R., & Mansourian, M. (2016). Neurofeedback: a comprehensive review on system design, methodology and clinical applications. Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, 7(2), 143.
Ollin, R. (2008). Silent pedagogy and rethinking classroom practice: structuring teaching through silence rather than talk. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(2), 265 - 280. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640802063528.
Othman, E., Yusoff, A. N., Mohamad, M., Manan, H. A., Giampietro, V., Abd Hamid, A. I., Dzulkifli, M. A., Osman, S. S., & Burhanuddin, W. I. D. W. (2019). Low intensity white noise improves performance in auditory working memory task: An fMRI study. Heliyon, 5(9), e02444.
Paret, C., Goldway, N., Zich, C., Keynan, J. N., Hendler, T., Linden, D., & Kadosh, K. C. (2019). Current progress in real-time functional magnetic resonance-based neurofeedback: Methodological challenges and achievements. NeuroImage, 202, 116107.
Rush, K. (2023). Individual Differences in the Effect of Neurofeedback Attention Training. University of Iowa.
Sattar, F. A., & Valdiya, P. S. (1999). Biofeedback in medical practice. Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 55(1), 51–54.
Söderlund, G., Sikström, S., & Smart, A. (2007). Listen to the noise: noise is beneficial for cognitive performance in ADHD. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 48(8), 840-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1469-7610.2007.01749.X.
Wagner, M. J., & Tilney, G. (1983). The Effect of “Superlearning Techniques” on the Vocabulary Acquisition and Alpha Brainwave Production of Language Learners. TESOL Quarterly, 17(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586420
Wang, Z. (2017). Neurofeedback training intervention for enhancing working memory function in attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) Chinese students. NeuroQuantology, 15(2), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2017.15.2.1073
Weber, L. A., Ethofer, T., & Ehlis, A.-C. (2020). Predictors of neurofeedback training outcome: A systematic review. NeuroImage: Clinical, 27, 102301.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
4) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
5) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
