Smartphone Use for Work during Personal Activities: An Investigation into Work-Life Conflict
This quantitative study investigates the impact of smartphone use for work and time-based work interference with leisure (WIL) on work-life conflict among 123 private-sector workers in Kuching, Sarawak. Analyses of Pearson Correlation Coefficients were carried out. The findings support previous research which suggests using smartphones for work after hours can lead to conflicts between employees' work and personal lives. Furthermore, the findings show that work-life conflict is compounded by time-based work interferences with leisure (WIL). These findings have ramifications for policies and procedures surrounding work-related smartphone use and the amount of time spent on specific tasks during off-work hours, which could negatively impact employees' work-life balance.
Adisa, T. A., Gbadamosi, G., & Osabutey, E. L. (2017). What happened to the border? The role of mobile information technology devices on employees' work-life balance. Personnel Review, 46(8), 1651-1671. doi:10.1108/pr-08-2016-0222
Aeon, B., & Aguinis, H. (2017). It's about time: New perspectives and insights on time-based work interference with leisure (WIL). Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(4), 309-330. doi:10.5465/amp.2016.0166
Boswell, W. R., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B. (2007). The use of communication technologies after hours: The role of work attitudes and work-life conflict. Journal of Management, 33(4), 592-610. doi:10.1177/0149206307302552
Cousins, K., & Robey, D. (2015). Managing work-life boundaries with mobile technologies. Information Technology & People, 28(1), 34-71. doi:10.1108/ITP-08-2013-0155.
de Bloom, J., Nawijn, J., Geurts, S., Kinnunen, U., & Korpela, K. (2017). Holiday travel, staycations, and subjective well-being. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25(4), 573-588. doi:10.1080/ 09669582.2016.1229323
Derks, D., Bakker, A. B., Peters, P., & van Wingerden, P. (2016). Work-related smartphone use, work-family conflict and family role performance: The role of segmentation preference. Human Relations, 69(5), 1045-1068. doi:10.1177/0018726715601890
Downward, P., & Dawson, P. (2016). Is it pleasure or health from leisure that we benefit from most? An analysis of well-being alternatives and implications for policy. Social Indicators Research, 126(1), 443-465. doi:10.1007/s11205-015-0887-8
Ghislieri, C., Emanuel, F., Molino, M., Cortese, C.G., & Colombo, L. (2017). New technologies smart or harm work-family boundaries management? Gender differences in conflict and enrichment using the JD-R theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01070
Gutek, B. A., Searle, S., & Klepa, L. (1991). Rational versus gender role explanations for work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(4), 560-568. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.4.560
Kim, J., Lee, S., Chun, S., Han, A., & Heo, J. (2017). The effects of leisure-time physical activity for optimism, life satisfaction, psychological well-being, and positive affect among older adults with loneliness. Annals of Leisure Research, 20(4), 406-415. doi:10.1080/11745398.2016.1238308
Kuykendall, L., Zhu, Z., & Craig, L. (2020). How work constrains leisure: New ideas and directions for interdisciplinary research. Journal of Leisure Research, 51(5), 635-642. doi: 10.1080/00222216.2020.1807841
Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013). The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science, 24(5), 1337-1357. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1120.0806
Ninaus, K., Diehl, S., & Terlutter, R. (2021). Employee perceptions of information and communication technologies in work life, perceived burnout, job satisfaction and the role of work-family balance. Journal of Business Research, 136, 652-666. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.007
Omar Lim, S. L. (2019). Daily smartphone use for work and its effect on work-life conflict among integrators. Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, 5(2), 1-13. doi:10.33736/jcshd.v5i2
Powell, G. N., Greenhaus, J. H., Allen, T. D., & Johnson, R. E. (2019). Introduction to special topic forum: Advancing and expanding work-life theory from multiple perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 44(1), 54-71. doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0310
Rothbard, N.P., & Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2016). Boundary Management. In T.D. Allen & L.T. Eby (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and family (pp.109-122). Oxford University Press.
Son, J. S., & Chen, C. (2018). Does using a smartphone for work purposes "ruin" your leisure? Examining the role of smartphone use in work-leisure conflict and life satisfaction. Journal of Leisure Research, 49(3-5), 236-257. doi:10.1080/00222216.2018.1534074
Tsaur, S, Liang, Y., & Hsu, H. (2012). A multidimensional measurement of work-leisure conflict. Leisure Sciences, 34(5), 395-416. doi:10.1080/01490400.2012.714701
Yun, H., Kettinger, W. J., & Lee, C. C. (2012). A new open door: The smartphone's impact on work-to-life conflict, stress, and resistance. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(4), 121-152. doi:10.2753/JEC1086-4415160405
Copyright (c) 2022 UNIMAS Publisher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
4) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
5) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.