Percentile Norms for an Early Reading Assessment in Malay
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.4469.2022Keywords:
percentile norms; transparent orthography; Malay language; young children; reading difficulties; early reading; assessment batteryAbstract
The study aimed to develop percentile norms on early reading proficiency among young elementary school children. These percentile norms were derived from a suite of early reading assessments in Malay administered to 866 Primary One (Grade 1 equivalent) school children from multilingual and multi-ethnic backgrounds. During testing, the children (462 males and 404 females) were approximately seven years old. The early reading assessment battery included measures such as letter writing, letter name knowledge, letter name fluency, rapid automatised naming, phonological awareness comprising elision, phonological memory, spelling, word reading accuracy, word reading efficiency, oral reading fluency, reading comprehension, vocabulary comprising expressive vocabulary and receptive vocabulary, and listening comprehension. These percentile norms are useful for the early identification and intervention of young children with reading difficulties and reading disabilities from multilingual communities whose languages include Malay, a transparent orthography. The implications of using the norms data for the diagnosis and classification of children with reading difficulties are discussed.
References
Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention: A review of literature. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 300-316.
https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325020230050501
Blachman, B. A. (2000). Phonological awareness. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.),
Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 483-502). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Boscardin, C. K., Muthén, B., Francis, D. J., & Baker, E. L., (2008). Early identification of reading difficulties using heterogeneous developmental trajectories. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 192-208.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.192
Bowey, J. A. (2007). Predicting individual differences in learning to read. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (155-172). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757642.ch9
Catts, H. W., Hogan, T. P., & Fey, M. E. (2003). Subgrouping of poor readers on the basis of individual differences in reading-related abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 151-164.
https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940303600208
Catts, H. W., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., Bridges, M. S., & Mendoza, K. (2009). Floor effects associated with universal screening and their impact on the early identification of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 163-176.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408326219
Compton, D. L. (2003). Modeling the relationship between growth in rapid naming speed and growth in decoding skill in first-grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 225-239.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.225
Conderman, G., Liberty, L., & DeSpain, S. (2017) Understanding accommodations, modifications, and interventions. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 53, 2, 70-75, doi: 10.1080/00228958.2017.129954
https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2017.1299545
de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2003). Developmental changes in the manifestations of a phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 22-40.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.22
Ehri, L. C. (2000). Learning to read and learning to spell: Two sides of a coin. Topics in Language Disorder, 20, 19-36.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200020030-00005
Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167-188.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239-256.
https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_3
Good, R. H., Gruba, J., & Kaminski, R. A. (2001). Best Practices in Using Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) in an Outcomes-Driven Model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology IV (pp. 679-700). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
Hasbrouck, J. & Tindal, G. (2017). An update to compiled ORF norms (Technical Report No. 1702). Eugene, OR, Behavioral Research and Teaching, University of Oregon.
Hogan, T. P., Adlof, S. M., & Alonzo, C. N. (2014). On the importance of listening comprehension. International Journal Of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(3), 199-207. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2014.904441
https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2014.904441
Khan, R. U., Lee, J. A. C., & Oon, Y. B. (2018). Machine learning and dyslexia: Diagnostic and classification system (DCS) for kids with learning disabilities. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(18), 97-100.
Lee, L. W. (2008). Development and validation of a reading-related assessment battery in Malay for the purpose of dyslexia assessment. Annals of Dyslexia, 58, 37-57.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-007-0011-0
Lee, J. A. C. (2022). Early reading assessment data in Malay, Mendeley Data, http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/sstsv55xsf.1
Lee, J. A. C, & Al Otaiba, S. (2017). End-of-kindergarten spelling outcomes: How can spelling error analysis data inform beginning reading instruction? Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33 (3), 226-238. doi: 10.1080/10573569.2016.1165639
https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2016.1165639
Lee, J. A. C., Lee, S., Yusoff, N. F. M., Ong, P. H., Nordin, Z. S., & Winskel, H. (2020). An early reading assessment battery for multilingual learners in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01700
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01700
Martins, M. A., & Capellini, S. A. (2021). Identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures. Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS, 34(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-021-00174-z
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-021-00174-z
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2019). Bahagian Perancangan Dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.my/korporat/bahagian-dan-unit/bahagian-perancangan-dan-penyelidikan-dasar-pendidikan.
Moats, L. C. (1995). Spelling development, disability, and instruction. Timonium, MD: York Press.
Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Stevenson, J. (2004). Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 40, 665-681.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.665
Nation, K. (2009). Reading comprehension and vocabulary: What's the connection? In R. K. Wagner, C. Schatschneider, & Phythian-Sence, C. (Eds.), Beyond decoding: The behavioral and biological foundations of reading comprehension (pp. 176-194). New York, NY: Guilford.
National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: National Center for Family Literacy.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (National Institute of Health Pub. No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Rathvon, N. (2004). Early Reading Assessment: A Practitioner's Handbook. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31-74.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.00004
Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Bolt, S. (2007). Assessment in special and inclusive education. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Savage, R., Pillay, V. & Melidona, S. (2008). Rapid serial naming is a unique predictor of spelling in children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 235-250.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408315814
Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Carlson, C., & Foorman, B. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 265−282.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.265
Schildkamp, K. (2019). Data-based decision-making for school improvement: Research insights and gaps. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1625716
https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1625716
Swanson, H. L., Zheng, X., & Jerman, O. (2009). Working memory, short-term memory, and reading disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 260-287.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409331958
Tang, S. G., Lee, J. A. C., & Misieng, J. (2018). Spelling scoring metrics in Malay language: An investigation among young spellers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(12), 1622-1628.
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0812.07
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
Treiman, R. (2000). The foundations of literacy. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 9, 89-92.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00067
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Wilcox, G., Fernandez Conde, C., & Kowbel, A. (2021). Using evidence-based practice and data-based decision making in inclusive education. Education Sciences, 11(3), 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030129
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030129
Wimmer, H., & Schurz, M. (2010). Dyslexia in regular orthographies: Manifestation and causation. Dyslexia, 16, 283-299.
https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.411
Woodcock, R. W. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
4) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
5) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
