PLUS – An Academic Mentorship Guide for Undergraduate Studies: A Preliminary Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.3675.2021Keywords:
undergraduate academic mentorship, undergraduate studies, zone of proximal development and scaffoldingAbstract
This paper introduces an approach to academic mentorship, named PLUS, that specifically assist students in their academic performance through personalised guidance. Through the guidance of a mentor, PLUS lets mentees evaluate their strength and weakness before setting their target to achieve for each subject. Based on this preliminary study with 23 computer science undergraduate students by measuring their academic performance using the cumulative grade point average (CGPA), students that are not introduced to PLUS tend to perform inconsistently throughout their undergraduate studies compared to those introduced to PLUS. Weaker students (CPGA <2.8) with face-to-face guidance with a mentor using the PLUS approach displayed constant improvement compared to those who did not have any mentor. Regardless of what stage of their undergraduate studies the students are introduced to PLUS, all the students that applied PLUS showed consistent improvement and agreed that the method is valid. PLUS, personalised guidance helps the mentor connect with the mentee better, a good complement to the digital education lacking in human connection. It warrants further investigation beyond this preliminary study.
References
Beed, P. L., Hawkins, E. M., & Roller, C. M. (1991). Moving learners toward independence: The power of scaffolded instruction. The Reading Teacher, 44(9), 648-655.
Castellanos, J., Gloria, A. M., Besson, D., & Harvey, L. O. C. (2016). Mentoring matters: Racial ethnic minority undergraduates' cultural fit, mentorship, and college and life satisfaction. Journal of College Reading & Learning, 46(2), 81-98.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2015.1121792
Cramer, R. J., & Prentice-Dunn, S. (2007). Caring for the whole person: Guidelines for advancing undergraduate mentorship. College Student Journal, 41(4), 771-778.
Gershenfeld, S. (2014). A review of undergraduate mentoring programs. Review of Educational Research, 84(3), 365-391.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313520512
Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2005). What is scaffolding? Teachers' Voices, 8, 8-16.
Hudley, A. H. C., Dickter, C. L., & Franz, H. A. (2017). The indispensable guide to undergraduate research: Success in and beyond college. Teachers College Press.
Jacobi, M. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 505-532.
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061004505
Johnson, W. B. (2015). On being a mentor: A guide for higher education faculty. New York, NY:Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315669120
Koch, C., & Johnson, W. B. (2000). Documenting the benefits of undergraduate mentoring. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 20 (4), 172-175. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Documenting+the+benefits+of+undergraduate+mentorin&btnG=&httpsredir=1&article=1040&context=psyc_fac
Lacasse, M., Audétat, M.-C., Boileau, É., Caire Fon, N., Dufour, M.-H., Laferrière, M.-C., Lafleur, A., La Rue, È., Lee, S., & Nendaz, M. (2019). Interventions for undergraduate and postgraduate medical learners with academic difficulties: A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 56. Medical Teacher, 41(9), 981-1001.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1596239
Murray, T., & Arroyo, I. (2002). Toward Measuring and Maintaining the Zone of Proximal Development in Adaptive Instructional Systems. In S. A. Cerri, G. Gouardères, & F. Paraguaçu. Intelligent Tutoring Systems Berlin, Heidelberg.
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47987-2_75
Oettingen, G., Kappes, H. B., Guttenberg, K. B., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2015). Self‐regulation of time management: Mental contrasting with implementation intentions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), 218-229.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2090
Palincsar, A. S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21(1-2), 73-98.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1986.9653025
Stoecker, J. A. (1999). Optimism and Grade Expectancies. Psychological Reports, 84(3), 873-879.
https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1999.84.3.873
Svanum, S., & Bigatti, S. (2006). Grade Expectations: Informed or Uninformed Optimism, or Both? Teaching of Psychology, 33(1), 14-18.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
4) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
5) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
