Influence of Supervisory Relationship and Satisfaction among Trainee Counselors in Practicum Process

  • Ghazali N M Faculty of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, UNIMAS
  • Taha M Faculty of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, UNIMAS
  • Wan Jaafar W M Faculty of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, UNIMAS
  • Anuar A Faculty of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, UNIMAS
  • Yahya F Faculty of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, UNIMAS
  • Roose M A.R Faculty of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, UNIMAS
Keywords: Supervisory Relationship, Supervision Satisfaction, Trainee Counselors

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to investigate the influence of supervisory relationship on supervision satisfaction among trainee counselors. The Supervisory Relationship Questionnaire (SRQ) is to measure the supervisory relationship and Supervisory Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ) is used to measure supervision satisfaction. The finding shows that supervisory relationship and its subscales (Safe Base, Structure, Commitment, Reflective Education, Role Model and Formative Feedback) have a positively significant relationship with supervision satisfaction among trainee counselors (safe base: r = 0.73, p < 0.05, structure: r = 0.65, p < 0.05, commitment: r = 0.69, p < .05, reflective education: r = 0.70, p < 0.05, role model: r = 0.51, p < 0.05, formative feedback: r = 0.71, p < 0.05 and supervisory relationship: r = 0.79, p < 0.05). The findings of this research also found that supervisory relationship, safe base and role model variables have significant influence on supervision satisfaction among trainee counselors with F (1, 98) = 169.59, p < 0.05, Adjusted R2 = 0.63 for supervisory relationship variable, F (3, 96) = 68.68, p < 0.05, Adjusted R2 = 67 for safe base variable and F (2, 97) = 96.47, p < 0.05, Adjusted R2 = 0.65 for role model variable. Supervisory relationship variable has the greatest influence (β = .79) while role model variable has the least influence (β = - 0.28) on supervision satisfaction. As for the theoretical implication, the finding of this research has proven Marina Palomo’s theoretical framework in ‘Bi-directional Model of the Supervisory Relationship’. Meanwhile in practical implication, this research has raised awareness on the importance of supervisory relationship on supervision satisfaction in counseling supervision. 

References

Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. G. (1998). Fundamentals of clinical supervision. Needham Height: Al-lyn & Bacon.

Bussey, L. E. (2015). The supervisory relationship: How style and working alliance relate to satisfaction. Doc-toral Dissertation. Tennessee Re-search and Creative Exchange.

Blount, A. J., & Mullen, R. P. (2015). Development of an integrative wellness model: Supervising coun-selors-in-training. The Professional Counselor, 5,100-113.

Breaux III, W. W. (2005). The relation-ship between the cultural compe-tence of counselor supervisors and the satisfaction with supervision of their supervisees. University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations, Paper 225.

Beinart, H. (2004). Models of supervision and the supervisory relationship and their evidence base. In L. Fleming, & L. Steen, Supervision and clinical psychology: Theory, practice and perspectives (pp. 36-50). Hove: Brunner-Routledge.

Carroll, M. (2007). One more time: What is supervision? Psychotherapy in Australia, 34-40.

Corey, G., Haynes, R., Moulton, P., & Muratori, M. (2010). Clinical su-pervision in the helping professions: A practical guide. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.

Gates, K. (n.d.). Models of supervision. Retrieved from Psychology continu-ing education: http://www.ceunit. com/ceu/models2.htm

Ladany, N., Ellis, M., & Friedlander, M. (1999). The supervisory working al-liance, trainee self-efficacy and sat-isfaction. Journal of Counseling and Development, 4,447-455.

Ladany, N., Hill, G., Corbett, M., & Nutt, E. (1996). Nature, extent, and important of what psychotherapy trainees do not disclosure it their supervisors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 10 (2), 10-24.

Rohani Mat Min. (2008). Counselling Practicum: Issues and challenges. Penerbit UMT: Terengganu.

Palomo, M., Beinart, H., & Cooper, M. (2010). Development and validation of the Supervisory Relationship Questionnaire (SRQ) in UK trainee clinical psychologists. British Jour-nal of Clinical Psychology, 49 (2), 131-149.

Shuss, C. M. (2012). Supervisory styles and satisfaction: genetic counseling student and graduate views. Case Western Reserve University Dissertation.

Ting, H.-C. (2009). Satisfaction with supervision as a function of the su-pervisory working alliance and self-efficacy among Taiwanese master-level counseling internship students . University of South Carolina Thesis and Dissertations, 1-157.

Wainwright, N. A. (2010). The develop-ment of the Leeds Alliance in Su-pervision Scale (LASS): A brief sessional measure of the supervisory alliance.(Unpublished doctoral dissertation) University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Zhang, N., & Parsons, R. D. (2015). Field experience transitioning from student to professional. Pennsylvania: Sage Publication.

Published
2016-09-01
How to Cite
M, G. N., M, T., M, W. J. W., A, A., F, Y., & A.R, R. M. (2016). Influence of Supervisory Relationship and Satisfaction among Trainee Counselors in Practicum Process. Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, 2(1), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.364.2016