A Comparative Assessment of Online Learning Readiness for First Year and Final Year Engineering Undergraduates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.3051.2021Abstract
Measuring student readiness in online learning should also be of great concern to institutions, including all areas from their curricular development to the pedagogies they experience. Although there have been attempts at universities to develop online learning courses, students' readiness has yet to be investigated, particularly for engineering students who take a mix of theoretical and practical-based courses. This study evaluates the readiness of civil engineering students toward the implementation of online learning and their preferences and acceptance towards online instructional delivery and assessment methods. Ways for improvement are proposed in line with the students’ readiness to determine the best desirable practices and strategies for online pedagogy. Respondents are selected from first and final year students, to examine and compare their online learning perspectives. A survey questionnaire was used. Findings revealed that year one and year four students' readiness was relatively moderate for most of the components and relatively high for the components that involved hardware/software requirements and technology skills. Most respondents indicated a moderate acceptance level on online assessment, ranging from a mean score of 3.46 to 3.81. As online learning is gradually becoming another method for life-long and self-determined learning, findings from the study might help university educators to develop better online learning strategies, especially delivery methods and assessments, to help students cope with online teaching and learning.
References
Abuhassna, H., Al-Rahmi, W.M., Yahya, N., Megat Zakaria, M.A.Z., Mohd Kosnin, A., & Darwish, M. (2020). Development of a new model on utilising online learning platforms to improve students' academic achievements and satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17 (38), 1-23 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00216-z
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00216-z
Azzi-Huck, K., & T. Shmis. (2020). Managing the impact of COVID-19 on education systems around the world: How countries are preparing, coping, and planning for recovery. Education for Global Development. Retrieved from https://blogs.worldbank.org/education/managing-impactcovid-19-education-systems-around-world-how-countries-are-preparing
Bartley, S. J., & Golek, J. H. (2004). Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Online and Face-toFace Instruction. Educational Technology & Society, 7(4), 167-175.
Bernard, R. M., Brauer, A., Abrami, P.C., & Surkes, M. (2004). The development of a questionnaire for predicting online learning achievement. Distance Education, 25(1), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791042000212440
https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791042000212440
Borotis, S., & Poulymenakou, A. (2004). E-Learning Readiness Components: Key Issues to Consider Before Adopting e-Learning Interventions. Paper presented at the E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2004, Washington, DC, USA. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/11555
Bugbee, A. C. (1996). The equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computer-based testing. Journalof Research on Computing in Education, 28, 282-299.https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1996.10782166
https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1996.10782166
Choucri, N., Maugis, V., Madnick, S., Siegel, M., Gillet, S., O'Donnel, S., & Haghseta, F. (2003). Global e - readiness-for what. Center for eBusiness at MIT. Group for Globalisation of e-Business, Center for eBusiness at MIT, Sloan School of Management.
Dabbagh, N. (2007). The online learner: Characteristics and pedagogical implications. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3), 217-226. Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/
Engin, M. (2017). Analysis of students' online learning readiness based on their emotional intelligence level. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(12A), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051306
https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051306
Evans, J., & Haase, I. (2001). Online business education in the twenty-first century: An analysis of potential target markets. Internet Research, 11(3), 246-260. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240110396432
https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240110396432
Forson, I. K., & Vuopala, E. (2019). Online learning readiness: Perspective of students enrolled in distance education in Ghana. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 7(4), 277- 294.
Gay G. H. E. (2018). Fixing the 'ready' in E-learning readiness. Trends in E-learning. Chapter 5, 65 - 83. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74287
https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74287
Geng, S., Law, K. M. Y., & Niu, B. (2019). Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blending learning environment. Int J Educ Technol High Educ, 16, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0147-0
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0147-0
Gilbert, B. (2015). Online learning revealing the benefits and challenges. Master Thesis. St. John Fisher College.
Hussin, H, Bunyarit, F, & Hussein, R (2009) Instructional design and e-learning: examining learners' perspective in Malaysian institutions of higher learning. Campus-Wide Information System, 26(1), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650740910921537
https://doi.org/10.1108/10650740910921537
Karabatzaki, Z., Stathopoulou, A., Kokkalia, G., Dimitriou, E., Loukeri, P.I., Economou, A., & Drigas A. (2018). Mobile application tools for students in secondary education: An evaluation study. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 12(2), 142-161.
https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v12i2.8158
Kearns, L.R. (2012). Student assessment of online learning: Challenges and effective practices. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(3), 198-208.
Khan, S., & Khan, R.A. (2019). Online assessments: Exploring perspectives of university students. Educucation and Information Technologies, 24, 661-677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9797-0
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9797-0
Lim, D. H. (2004). Cross-cultural differences in online learning motivation. Educational Media International, 41(2), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980410001685784
https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980410001685784
Mattice, N. J., & Dixon, P.S. (1999). Student preparedness for distance education (Research Report). Santa Clarita, CA: College of the Canyons
Martin, F., Stamper, B., & Flowers, C. (2020). Examining student perception of their readiness for online learning: Importance and confidence. Online Learning, 24(2), 38-58. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2053
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2053
McVay, M. (2000). Developing a Web-based distance student orientation to enhance student success in an online bachelor's degree completion program. Dissertation, Nova Southeastern University, USA. Retrieved from http://web.pdx.edu/∼mmlynch/McVaydissertation.pdf
McVay, M. (2001). How to be a successful distance education student: Learning on the Internet. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Nguyen, T. (2015). The effectiveness of online Learning: Beyond no significant difference and future horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 309-319.
Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Parnell, J. A., & Carraher, S. (2003). The Management Education by Internet Readiness (Mebir) Scale: Developing a scale to assess personal readiness for internet-mediated management education. Journal of Management Education, 27(4), 431-446. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562903252506
https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562903252506
Said, S.M. (2020). No Internet but lessons go on for students in a remote village. Accessed, January 18, 2021, https://bernama.com/en/features/news.php?id=1838574
Selvanathan M, Hussin NAM, Azazi NAN. (2020). Students' learning experiences during COVID19: Work from home period in Malaysian Higher Learning Institutions. Teaching Public Administration.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420977900
Seth S. (2017). Challenges & benefits of learning management systems. Accessed January 25, 2021, from https://www.gnosisconnect.com/resources/blog/challenges-benefits-of-learningmanagement-systems-lms/
Shahzad, A., Hassan, R., Aremu, A.Y., Hussain, A., & Lodhi, R.N. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on E-learning on higher education institution students: the group comparison between male and female. Qual Quant. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01028-z
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01028-z
Sia, J. K.-M. and Abbas Adamu, A. (in press), Facing the unknown: pandemic and higher education in Malaysia, Asian Education and Development Studies.
Smith, P. J. (2000). Preparedness for flexible delivery among vocational learners. Distance Education, 21(1), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791000210103
https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791000210103
Smith, P. J. (2005). Learning preferences and readiness for online learning. Educational Psychology, 25(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000294868
https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000294868
Smith, P. J., Murphy K.L., Mahoney S.E. (2003) Towards identifying factors underlying readinessfor online learning: An exploratory study. Distance Education, 24(1), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910303043
https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910303043
Sun A., Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 157-190. https://doi.org/10.28945/3502
Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., et al. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93-135. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076001093
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076001093
Watkins, R., Leigh, D., & Triner, D. (2004). Assessing readiness for e-learning. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 17(4), 66-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-8327.2004.tb00321.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
4) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
5) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
