Students’ Perception on the Relative Fairness of Selected Educational Accommodations
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to assess the relative fairness of selected educational accommodations provided to peers who have disabilities. This study utilized two scales developed by Upton (2000) which quantifies the relative fairness that students perceive towards the provision of selected educational accommodations. The findings of this study yielded evidence to support that level of education at a university level might have an influence on the students’ perceptions about educational accommodations offered to the students with disabilities. These surveys were distributed to around 409 students at a mid-size southern public university in the United States. Implications of these findings and suggestions for future research are provided.
Keywords: students with disabilities; educational accommodations
References
Allen, T. D., & Eby, L. T. (2003). Relationship effectiveness for mentors: Factors associated with learning and quality. Journal of Management, 29(4), 469-486.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00021-7
Anderson, E. M., & Shannon, A. L. (1988). Toward a conceptualization of mentoring. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 38-42.
https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718803900109
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Bouchard, T. J., Lykken, D., Tellegen, A., & McGue, M. (1996). Genes, drives, environment, and experience. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues (pp.5-43). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bova, B. M., & Phillips, R. (1984). Mentoring as a learning experience for adults. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(3), 16-20.
https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718403500304
Bozionelos, N. (2004). Mentoring provided: Relation to mentor's career success, personality, mentoring received. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 24-46.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00033-2
Britner, P. A., & Kraimer-Rickaby, L. (2009). Mentoring and its role in promoting academic and social competency. In T. P. Gullotta, M.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79920-9_5
Bloom, C. F. Gullotta & J. C. Messina (Eds.), A blueprint for promoting academic and social competence in after-school programs (pp. 79-100). New York: Springer.
Burger, J. M. (1992). Desire for control and academic performance. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 24(2), 147-155.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0078716
Campbell, T., & Campbell, D. (2007). Outcomes of mentoring at-risk college students: gender and ethnic matching effects. Mentoring and tutoring: Partnership in learning, 15(2), 135-148.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260601086287
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO P-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2009). Organisation Development and change. (9th ed.). Masan: SouthWestern Cengage Learning.
Cuperman, R., & Ickes, W. (2009). Big five predictors of behavior and perceptions in initial dyadic interactions: Personality similarity helps extraverts and introverts, but hurts "disagreeables". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(4), 667-684.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015741
Davis, D. J. (2007). Access to academe: The importance of mentoring to black student. Fall. Winter, 58, 3-4.
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five factor model, Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221
Eby, L. T., Allen, T. D., Evans, S. C., Ng, T., & DuBois, D. L. (2008). Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 254-267.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.04.005
Edlind, E. P., & Haensly, P. A. (1985). Gifts of mentorship. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(2), 55-60.
https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628502900202
Elisabeth, H. S. (2008). Effectiveness of a seminary's training and mentoring program and subsequent job satisfaction of its graduates. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 17, 25-53.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10656210801967309
Felissa, K. L., Thomas, W. D., & Daniel, B. T. (2000). The Role - of personality and world values in mentoring programs. Review of Business, 21(1/2), 13-41.
Fontana, D. (2000). Personality in the workplace. England: Macmilan Press Ltd.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-333-99384-2
Freiberg, M., Zbikowski, J., & Ganser, T. (1997). Promoting mid-career growth through mentoring. Journal of Staff Development, 18(2), 52-54.
Garner, C., Byars, A., Greenwood, M., & Garner, K. (2003). 16PF in screening for appropriateness of mentors. Psychological Reports, 92(1), 35-42.
https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2003.92.1.35
Gold, M. J, & Pepin, B. (1987). Passing the Torch: Retired Teachers as Mentors for New Teachers. New York: City University of New York.
Guetzloe, E. (1997). The power of positive relationships: Mentoring programs in the school and community. Preventing school failure, 41(3), 100-112.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10459889709603275
Hansman, C. A. (1998). Mentoring and women's career development. New directions for adult and continuing education, 1998(80), 63-71.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.8007
Hofstede, W. K. B., Kiers, H. A. L., de Raad, B., Goldberg, L. R., & Ostendorf, F. (1997). Comparison of Big-Five structures of personality traits in Dutch, English, and German. European Journal of Personality, 11(1), 15-31.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199703)11:1<15::AID-PER273>3.0.CO;2-8
Ismail, A., Hasbullah, K., Bakar, R. A., & Boerhanoeddin, A. (2005). Amalan komunikasi dalam program mentoring: Pemindahan pengetahuan, kemahiran dan kebolehan memainkan peranan bersyarat dalam organisasi. Jurnal Pendidikan, 25,
Ismail, A., Michael, K. K. J., & Abdullah, M. M. (2009). Formal mentoring, gender type in mentorship and individual's psychosocial: A moderating model approach. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 3. 10-24.
Ismail, A., Abdullah, D. N. M., & Khian Jui, M. K. (2011). Relationship between mentoring program characteristics, self-efficacy and mentee outcomes: A study of the Malaysian institutions of higher learning in Sarawak. FRGS Research Report, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Sarawak.
Ismail, A., Alias, A. & Amir, A. F. (2012). Mentors' communication styles as predictors of mentees' academic performance. Studies in Business and Economics, 7(3), 14-26.
Jean, S. P., Cidhinnia, M. T. C., Delia, M. P. K., & Chami K. (2011). Processes and outcomes of a mentoring program for latino college freshmen. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 599-621.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01716.x
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102-138). New York:
Guilford.Karcher, M. (2007). Cross-age peer mentoring: Youth mentoring: Research in Action, 1 (7), 3-17.
Kram, K. E. (1985). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenview, IL:
Scott, Foresman, & Company. Luke, D., Taylor, & Robin, W. (1987). Marketing Research. Eaglewood: Prentice Hall.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81-90.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81
McKenzie, K., Gow, K., & Schweitzer, R. (2004). Exploring first-year academic achievement through structural equation modelling. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(1), 95-112.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436032000168513
Melissa, A. F., Samuel, E. F., Timothy, A. C., & Jan, N. H. (2011). Mentoring highly aggressive children: Pre-post changes in mentors' attitudes, personality, and attachment tendencies. Springer Science, 32, 253-270.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-011-0254-8
Merriam, S. (1993). Mentors and protégés: A critical review of the literature. Adult Education Quarterly, 33(3), 161-173.
https://doi.org/10.1177/074171368303300304
Mullen, E. J. (1998). Vocational and psychosocial mentoring functions: Identifying mentors who serve both. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 9, 319-339.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.3920090403
Mullen, E. J., & Noe, R. A. (1999). The mentoring information exchange: When do mentors seek information from their protégés? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 233-242.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199903)20:2<233::AID-JOB925>3.0.CO;2-F
Noe, R., Greenberger, D. B., & Wang, S. (2002). Mentoring: What we know and where we might go. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 21, 129-173.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(02)21003-8
Nikos, B., & Giorgos, B. (2010), Mentoring received by proteges: Its relation to personality and mental ability in the anglo-saxon organizational environment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(4), 509-529.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09585191003612000
Nora, A., & Crisp, G. (2007). Mentoring students: Conceptualizing and validating the multi-dimensions of a support system. Journal of College Retention: Research, Theory, and Practice, 9(3), 337-356.
https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.9.3.e
Nguyen, N. T., Allen, L. C., & Fraccastoro, K. (2005). Personality predicts academic performance: Exploring the moderating role of gender. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 27(1), 105-116.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800500046313
Nunally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Mart'ınez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401- 421.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127
Ragins, B. R., & Kram, K. E. (2007). The roots and meaning of mentoring. In B. R. Ragins and K. E. Kram (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 21-50). Los Angeles,
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976619
CA: Sage.
Paunonen, S. V. (2003). Big five factors of personality and replicated predictions of behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 411-422.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.411
Roberts, A. (2000). Mentoring revisited: a phenomenological reading of the literature. Mentoring and Tutoring, 8(2), 145-170.
https://doi.org/10.1080/713685524
Roberts, A. (1999). The origins of the term mentor. History of Education Society Bulletin, 64, 313-329.
Santos, S. J., & Reigadas, E. T. (2005). Understanding the student-faculty mentoring process: Its effect on at risk university students. Journal of College Student Retention, 6(3), 337- 357.
https://doi.org/10.2190/KGVC-7218-DPER-RMBC
Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (1994). Theories of personality (5th ed). California: Brooks/ Cole Publishing Company.
Stoltz, A.D. (2005). The relationship between peer mentoring program participation and successful transition to high school. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Davis, United States -- California. Retrieved from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text on December 16, 2010.
Sushmita, S., & Jomon, M. G. (2013). Outcome linkage in formal and supervisory mentoring in a business organization. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(1), 82-96.
Svanum, S., & Zody, Z. B. (2001). Psychopathology and college grades. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(1), 72-76.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.48.1.72
Turban, D. B., & Lee, F. K. (2007). The role of personality in mentoring relationships: Formation, Dynamics, and Outcomes. B.R. Ragins, K.E.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976619.n2
Kram (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2007), pp. 21-50.
Wanberg, C. R.,Welsh, E. T., & Hezlett, S. A. (2003). Mentoring research: A review and dynamic process model. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 22, 39-124.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
4) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
5) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
