Students’ Perception on the Relative Fairness of Selected Educational Accommodations
The purpose of this study is to assess the relative fairness of selected educational accommodations provided to peers who have disabilities. This study utilized two scales developed by Upton (2000) which quantifies the relative fairness that students perceive towards the provision of selected educational accommodations. The findings of this study yielded evidence to support that level of education at a university level might have an influence on the students’ perceptions about educational accommodations offered to the students with disabilities. These surveys were distributed to around 409 students at a mid-size southern public university in the United States. Implications of these findings and suggestions for future research are provided.
Keywords: students with disabilities; educational accommodations
Allen, T. D., & Eby, L. T. (2003). Relationship effectiveness for mentors: Factors associated with learning
and quality. Journal of Management, 29(4), 469-486.
Anderson, E. M., & Shannon, A. L. (1988). Toward a conceptualization of mentoring. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 38–42.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological
research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Bouchard, T. J., Lykken, D., Tellegen, A., & McGue, M. (1996). Genes, drives, environment, and experience. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues (pp.5–43). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
Bova, B. M., & Phillips, R. (1984). Mentoring as a learning experience for adults. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(3), 16-20.
Bozionelos, N. (2004). Mentoring provided: Relation to mentor’s career success, personality, mentoring received. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 24–46.
Britner, P. A., & Kraimer-Rickaby, L. (2009). Mentoring and its role in promoting academic and social
competency. In T. P. Gullotta, M.
Bloom, C. F. Gullotta & J. C. Messina (Eds.), A blueprint for promoting academic and social competence in after-school programs (pp. 79-100). New York: Springer.
Burger, J. M. (1992). Desire for control and academic performance. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 24(2), 147-155.
Campbell, T., & Campbell, D. (2007). Outcomes of mentoring at-risk college students: gender and ethnic matching effects. Mentoring and tutoring: Partnership in learning, 15(2), 135-148.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO P–R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO–FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2009).
Organisation Development and change. (9th ed.). Masan: SouthWestern Cengage Learning.
Cuperman, R., & Ickes, W. (2009). Big five predictors of behavior and perceptions in initial dyadic interactions: Personality similarity helps extraverts and introverts, but hurts “disagreeables”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Davis, D. J. (2007). Access to academe: The importance of mentoring to black student. Fall. Winter, 58, 3-4.
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five factor model, Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.
Eby, L. T., Allen, T. D., Evans, S. C., Ng, T., & DuBois, D. L. (2008). Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 254-267.
Edlind, E. P., & Haensly, P. A. (1985). Gifts of mentorship. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(2), 55-60.
Elisabeth, H. S. (2008). Effectiveness of a seminary’s training and mentoring program and subsequent job satisfaction of its graduates. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 17, 25-53.
Felissa, K. L., Thomas, W. D., & Daniel, B. T. (2000). The Role – of personality and world values in mentoring programs. Review of Business, 21(1/2), 13-41.
Fontana, D. (2000). Personality in the workplace. England: Macmilan Press Ltd.
Freiberg, M., Zbikowski, J., & Ganser, T. (1997). Promoting mid-career growth through mentoring. Journal
of Staff Development, 18(2), 52-54.
Garner, C., Byars, A., Greenwood, M., & Garner, K. (2003). 16PF in screening for appropriateness of mentors. Psychological Reports, 92(1),
Gold, M. J, & Pepin, B. (1987). Passing the Torch: Retired Teachers as Mentors for New Teachers. New
York: City University of New York.
Guetzloe, E. (1997). The power of positive relationships: Mentoring programs in the school and community. Preventing school failure, 41(3), 100–
Hansman, C. A. (1998). Mentoring and women’s career development. New directions for adult and continuing
education, 1998(80), 63-71.
Hofstede, W. K. B., Kiers, H. A. L., de Raad, B., Goldberg, L. R., & Ostendorf, F. (1997). Comparison of
Big-Five structures of personality traits in Dutch, English, and German. European Journal of Personality, 11(1), 15–31.
Ismail, A., Hasbullah, K., Bakar, R. A., & Boerhanoeddin, A. (2005). Amalan komunikasi dalam program mentoring: Pemindahan pengetahuan, kemahiran dan kebolehan memainkan peranan bersyarat dalam
organisasi. Jurnal Pendidikan, 25,
Ismail, A., Michael, K. K. J., & Abdullah, M. M. (2009). Formal mentoring, gender type in mentorship and individual’s psychosocial: A moderating model approach. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 3. 10-24.
Ismail, A., Abdullah, D. N. M., & Khian Jui, M. K. (2011). Relationship between mentoring program characteristics, self-efficacy and mentee outcomes: A study of the Malaysian institutions of higher learning in
Sarawak. FRGS Research Report, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Sarawak.
Ismail, A., Alias, A. & Amir, A. F. (2012). Mentors’ communication styles as predictors of mentees’ academic
performance. Studies in Business and Economics, 7(3), 14-26.
Jean, S. P., Cidhinnia, M. T. C., Delia, M. P. K., & Chami K. (2011). Processes and outcomes of a mentoring program for latino college freshmen. Journal of Social Issues,
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford.
Karcher, M. (2007). Cross-age peer mentoring: Youth mentoring: Research
in Action, 1 (7), 3-17.
Kram, K. E. (1985). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenview, IL:
Scott, Foresman, & Company. Luke, D., Taylor, & Robin, W. (1987). Marketing Research. Eaglewood:
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and
observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90.
McKenzie, K., Gow, K., & Schweitzer, R. (2004). Exploring first-year academic achievement through structural equation modelling. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(1), 95-112.
Melissa, A. F., Samuel, E. F., Timothy, A. C., & Jan, N. H. (2011). Mentoring highly aggressive children:
Pre–post changes in mentors’ attitudes, personality, and attachment tendencies. Springer Science, 32,
Merriam, S. (1993). Mentors and protégés: A critical review of the literature. Adult Education Quarterly, 33(3),
Mullen, E. J. (1998). Vocational and psychosocial mentoring functions: Identifying mentors who serve
both. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 9, 319–339.
Mullen, E. J., & Noe, R. A. (1999). The mentoring information exchange:
When do mentors seek information from their protégés? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20,
Noe, R., Greenberger, D. B., & Wang, S. (2002). Mentoring: What we know and where we might go. Research
in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 21, 129–173.
Nikos, B., & Giorgos, B. (2010), Mentoring received by proteges: Its relation to personality and mental
ability in the anglo-saxon organizational environment. The International Journal of Human Resource
Management, 21(4), 509-529.
Nora, A., & Crisp, G. (2007). Mentoring students: Conceptualizing and validating the multi-dimensions of a
support system. Journal of College Retention: Research, Theory, and Practice, 9(3), 337-356.
Nguyen, N. T., Allen, L. C., & Fraccastoro, K. (2005). Personality predicts academic performance: Exploring the
moderating role of gender. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 27(1), 105-116.
Nunally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Mart´ınez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual
Review of Psychology, 57, 401– 421.
Ragins, B. R., & Kram, K. E. (2007). The roots and meaning of mentoring. In B. R. Ragins and K. E. Kram (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 21-50). Los Angeles,
Paunonen, S. V. (2003). Big five factors of personality and replicated predictions of behavior. Journal of Personality and S ocial Psychology, 84(2), 411–422.
Roberts, A. (2000). Mentoring revisited: a phenomenological reading of the
literature. Mentoring and Tutoring, 8(2), 145-170.
Roberts, A. (1999). The origins of the term mentor. History of Education Society Bulletin, 64, 313–329.
Santos, S. J., & Reigadas, E. T. (2005). Understanding the student-faculty mentoring process: Its effect on atrisk university students. Journal of College Student Retention, 6(3),
Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (1994). Theories of personality (5th ed).
California: Brooks/ Cole Publishing Company.
Stoltz, A.D. (2005). The relationship between peer mentoring program participation and successful transition to high school. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Davis, United States -- California. Retrieved from Dissertations
& Theses: Full Text on December 16, 2010.
Sushmita, S., & Jomon, M. G. (2013). Outcome linkage in formal and supervisory mentoring in a business
organization. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(1), 82-96.
Svanum, S., & Zody, Z. B. (2001). Psychopathology and college grades. Journal of Counseling Psychology,
Turban, D. B., & Lee, F. K. (2007). The role of personality in mentoring relationships: Formation, Dynamics,
and Outcomes. B.R. Ragins, K.E.
Kram (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2007), pp. 21–50.
Wanberg, C. R.,Welsh, E. T., & Hezlett, S. A. (2003). Mentoring research: A review and dynamic process
model. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 22, 39–124.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.