Perceived Fairness in Performance Appraisal System and Its Relationship with Work Performance
AbstractThis study aims to identify employee perceptions of perceived fairness in performance appraisal system and work performance as the performance appraisal system is crucial to evaluate employees’ performance in every organization; public or private. A private Oil & Gas company in Miri, Sarawak was chosen for this study. Quantitative research method was employed in this study, and closed-ended questionnaires were used to collect data from respondents. Statistical analysis using One Way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and Independent sample t-test were used to test the hypotheses. The findings showed that there were no significance differences between the selected demographic factors (age, gender, duration of service, highest educational level, and rank) in performance appraisal system and the work performance. Also, there was a significant relationship between the rating accuracy in the performance appraisal system and work performance. Besides that, there was a significant relationship between employee perceptions of leadership styles in decision making in the performance appraisal system and work performance. The findings also showed that employees are concerned with the evaluation and rating given by their supervisor because the outcomes of the performance appraisal will influence their career development in the organization. Thus, performance appraisal system is crucial in increasing the work performance of employees and organization. Organizations should emphasize the role of the performance appraisal system practiced in their organizations and recognize that it is important in improving employees’ performance. Future researchers are encouraged to explore further on the performance appraisal elements that have not been investigated in this study, and conduct the research with a bigger population and sample size.
Keywords: Performance Appraisal System; rating accuracy; leadership styles; work performance
Ahmad, R. (2012). Performance appraisal decision: Raters cognitive maps. Kuching, Sarawak: RS Publishing
House. Ahmad, R. Usop, H. Ismail, A. Bujang, S. & Abu Mansor, N. H. (2014). Conducting research in
social sciences and management studies. Practical and a step-bystep guide (2nd ed.). Malaysia: RS
Ben, C. B. (2011). Leadership among secondary school agricultural science teachers and their job performance
in AkwaIbom. World Journal of Education, 2(2), 16-24.
Bernardin, H. J., Tyler, C. L., & Villanova, P. (2009). Rating level and accuracy as a function of rater personality.
International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(3),300-310.
Choi, S. L., Tan, O. K., Wan Ismail, W. I. & Abdul Rasid, S. Z. (2013). A review on performance appraisal
system: An ineffective and destructive practice. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 14(7), 887-
Crawford, J.C., & Nonis, S. (1996). The Relationship between Boundary Spanners’ Job Satisfaction and the Management Control System. Journal of Managerial Issues, 8(1), 125-134.
Daniel C.H. (2009). The effects of higher education policy on the location decision of individuals: Evidence
from Florida’s bright future scholarship program. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39, 553-
Darehzereshki. M. (2013). Effects of performance appraisal quality on job satisfaction in multinational companies in Malaysia. International Journal of Enterprise Computing and Business Systems, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.ijecbs.
Dean, K. (1977). Sex Difference in Personality Variables in Social Behavior. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Dessler, G., & Tan, C. H. (2009). Human resource management: An Asian perspective (2nd ed.). Singapore:
Elverfeldt, A. V. (2005). Performance appraisal: How to improve its effectiveness. University of Twente,
Gbadamosi, G., & Joubert, P. (2005). Money ethic, moral conduct and work related attitudes: Field study from
the public sector in Swaziland. The Journal of Management Development, 24(7/8), 754-763.
Hassan. R. (2005). Perceptions of academicians towards performance appraisal onMalaysian public university. PhD Thesis.University Putra Malaysia. Retrieved from University Putra Malaysia Digital Theses.
Hullin, K.L., & Smith, P.C. (1965). Sex Difference in Job Satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology. 35, (56-57).
Jawahar, I.M., & Stone, T.H. (2011). Fairness perceptions and satisfaction with components of pay satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(4), 297-312.
Jex, S.M. (2002). Organizational Psychology: A scientist-practitioner approach. New York: John Wiley
Karimi, R. Malik, M. I. & Hussain S. (2011). Examining the relationship of performance appraisal system
and employee satisfaction. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(22), 243-247.
Kumar, D. (2005). Performance appraisal: The importance of rater training. Journal of the Kuala Lumpur Royal
Malaysia Police College, (4), 1-17.
Kondrasuk, J.N. (2011). So what would an ideal performance appraisal look
like?. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 12(1). Retrieved from businesspress.homestead.
Kochan, T., Bezrukova, K., Ely, R., Jackson, S., Joshi, A., Jehn, K., Leonard, J., Levine, D., & Thomas, D.
(2003). The effects of diversity on business performance: Report
of the diversity research network. Human Resource Management, 42(1), 3-21.
Kotur, B. R., & Anbazhagan, S. (2014). Influence of Leadership Styles on Self Performance. IOSR Journal of
Business and Management (IOSRJBM), 16(5), 111-119.
Longenecker, C. O., & Goff, S. J. (1992). Performance appraisal effectiveness: A matter of perspective. SAM
Advanced Management Journal,
Mustapha, M. & Daud, N. (2012). Perceived performance appraisal effectiveness career commitment and
turnover intention of knowledge workers. International Journal of Business and Social Science,
Mayer, R. C., & Davis, A. J. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 123-136.
McBey, K., & Karakowsky, L. (2001). Examining sources of influence on employee turnover in the part-time context. Journal of Career Development International, 21(3), 136- 144.
Mohsin Bashir., Liao, J. Q., Zhao, J., Faheem Ghazanfarn, & Muhammad
Mahroof Khan (2011). The role of demographic factors in the relationship between high performance
worksystem and job satisfaction: A multidimensional approach. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(18), 207-218.
Mohrman, A.M., Resnick-West, S. M., & Lawler, E. E. (1990). Designing
performance appraisal system: Aligning appraisals and organizational realities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Roebuck, D.B., Sightler, K.W., & Brush, C.C. (1995). Organizational size, company type and position effects
on the perceived importance of oral and written communication skills. Journal of Managerial Issues, 7(3), 77-85.
Ruggai, J.R., & Agih, A.A. (2008). Experience and qualification as correlates of teacher job performance in secondary schools in Bayelsa State. African Journal of Education Research and Development, 2(1).
Salleh, M. Amin, A. Shaladin Muda & Muhammad AbiSofian Abdul Halim (2013). Fairness of performance appraisal and organizational commitment. Asian Social Science, 9(2), 121-128.
Sarmiento, R., Beale, J., & Knowles, G. (2007). Determinants of performance amongst shop-floor employees: A preliminary investigation. Management Research News, 30(12), 915-927.
Shaiful, A. K., Kamaruzaman, J., Hassan, A., Mohammad, I., Kamsol, M.K., & Norhashimah, A.R. (2009). Gender as moderator of the relationship between OCB and turnover intention. Journal of Asian Social Science, 5(6), 108-117.
Shultz, K.S., & Adam, G.A. (2007). Aging and Work in the 21st Century. New Jersey: Routledge Publisher.
Smedley, K., & Whitten, H. (2006). Age Matters, Employing, Motivating and Managing Older Employees.
United Kingdom: Gower Publisher.
Springer, G.J. (2011). A study of job motivation, satisfaction, and performance among bank employees.
Journal of Global Business Issues, 5(1), 29-42.
Sudin, S. (2011). Fairness of and satisfaction with performance appraisal process. Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Business and Economic Research (pp.1239-1255). Universiti Tenaga Nasional.
Warrick, D. D. (1981). Leadership styles and their consequences. Journal of Experiential Learning and Simulation, 3(4), 155-172.
Yearta, S.K. (1995). Does Age Matter. Journal of Management Development. 14(7), 28-35.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.