Measuring Reliability of Metacognitive Strategies in Reading Comprehension Questionnaire: A Pilot Study on First Year Engineering Students in Pakistan

  • Mansoor Ahmed Channa
  • Zaimuariffudin Shukri Nordin

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the reliability (psychometric properties) of the metacognitive strategies questionnaire piloted on Pakistani engineering students of QUEST, Nawabshah. The questionnaire had four parts including demographic, reading comprehension, metacognition, and scaffolding having 53 questions that were tested on 37 first year engineering students. The Cronbach’s Alpha reliability was measured through SPSS 17. The results showed that the Cronbach’s Alpha reliability concerning reading comprehension ranged from .826-.842, metacognitive strategies ranged from.830-.839, and the reliability of scaffolding ranged from .829-.837. Therefore, the results from the pilot study showed that the questionnaire needed to be used without any modification in the actual study.

Keywords: metacognition; cognition; thought processes; meta-comprehension

References

Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading

strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364-373.

Akama, K. (2006). Relations among selfefficacy, goal setting, and metacognitive experiences in problem solving. Psychological Reports, 98(3), 895-907.

Bogdan, R. J. (2000). Minding minds: Evolving a reflexive mind by interpreting others. Cambridge, MA:

The MIT Press.

Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms, In F. Weinert, & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. NY:

Addison Wesley Longman.

Cross, D. R., & Paris, S. G. (1988). Developmental an instructional analysis of children’s metacognition and

reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 131–142.

Efklides, A., & Petkaki, C. (2005). Effects of mood on students’ metacognitive experiences. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 415-431.

Fauzan, N. (2003). The effects of metacognitive strategies on reading comprehension: A quantitative synthesis and the empirical investigation, Durham theses, Durha University, Available at: http://etheses.

dur.ac.uk/1086/

Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-6), Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.

Flavell, J. H. (1999). Cognitive development: Children’s knowledge about the mind. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 21-45.

Hacker, D. J. (1998). Definitions and empirical foundations, In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.),

Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 1-13). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Hammadou, J. (1991). Interrelationship among prior knowledge, inference, and language proficiency in foreign

language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 75(1), 27-38.

Kluwe, R. H. (1987). Executive decisions and regulation of problem solving behavior. In F. Weinert & R. Kluwe

(Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 1-19), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Livingston.

Metcalfe, J. (2000). Meta-memory: Theory and data, In E. Tulving & F.I. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory, (pp. 197-211), NY: OUP.

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive Awareness. Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460-475.

Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Staley, R., & DuBois, N. (2004). Metacognition and self-regulated learning

constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 117–139.

Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006).

Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14.

Weinert, F. E. (1987). Introduction and overview: Metacognition and motivation as determinants of effective learning and understanding,

In F. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 1-19), Hillsdale,

NJ: Erlbaum.

Published
2016-03-01
How to Cite
Ahmed Channa, M., & Shukri Nordin, Z. (2016). Measuring Reliability of Metacognitive Strategies in Reading Comprehension Questionnaire: A Pilot Study on First Year Engineering Students in Pakistan. Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, 1(2), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.194.2016