Daily Smartphone Use for Work and Its Effect on Work-Life Conflict among Integrators

  • Sheilla Lim Omar Lim UNIMAS



This daily diary study investigates the effects of daily smartphone use for work during off-work hours on work-life conflict. Drawing on role theory which supports the notion that segmentation is a boundary management strategy, the moderating effect of individual’s segmentation preference is proposed. Results of multilevel regression analyses showed that smartphone use for work was positively related to work-life conflict. The result also shows that the preference to integrate work and personal life rather than separate these domains strengthened the relation between smartphone use for work and work-life conflict. The results of this study may help human resource practitioners to better understand the impact of staying connected to work during off-work hours.


Keywords: Daily smartphone use; Work-life conflict; Segmentation preference; Diary study


Allen, T. D., Cho, E., & Meier, L. L. (2014). Work-family boundary dynamics. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology & Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 99-121.


Beal, D. J. (2015). ESM 2.0: State of the art and future potential of experience sampling methods in organizational research. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 2(1), 383-407.


Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 579-616.


Borges, A. P., & Joia, L. A. (2015). Paradoxes perception and smartphone use by Brazilian executives: Is this genderless?. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 26(2), 205-218.


Butts, M. M., Becker, W. J., & Boswell, W. R. (2015). Hot buttons and time sinks: The effects of electronic communication during nonwork time on emotions and work-nonwork conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 763-788.


Derks, D., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Smartphone use, work-home interference, and burnout: A diary study on the role of recovery. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 63(3), 411-440.


Derks, D., Bakker, A. B., Peters, P., & van Wingerden, P. (2016). Work-related smartphone use, work-family conflict and family role performance: The role of segmentation preference. Human Relations, 69(5), 1045-1068.


Derks, D., Duin, D., Tims, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2015). Smartphone use and work-home interference: The moderating role of social norms and employee work engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(1), 155-177.


Dettmers, J. (2017). How extended work availability affects well-being: The mediating roles of psychological detachment and work-family-conflict. Work & Stress, 31(1), 24-41.


Dettmers, J., Bamberg, E., & Seffzek, K. (2016). Characteristics of extended availability for work: The role of demands and resources. International Journal of Stress Management, 23(3), 276-297.


Diaz, I., Chiaburu, D. S., Zimmerman, R. D., & Boswell, W. R. (2012). Communication technology: Pros and cons of constant connection to work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 500-508.


Dumas, T. L., & Sanchez-Burks, J. (2015). The professional, the personal, and the ideal worker: Pressures and objectives shaping the boundary between life domains. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 803-843.


Fujimoto, Y., Ferdous, A. S., Sekiguchi, T., & Sugianto, L. F. (2016). The effect of mobile technology usage on work engagement and emotional exhaustion in Japan. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3315-3323.


Gazzaley, A. & Rosen, L.D. (2017). Are you a self-interrupter? Distraction in the technology use. http://nautil.us/issue/48/ chaos/are-you-a-self_interrupter

Glavin, P., & Peters, A. (2015). The costs of caring: Caregiver strain and work-family conflict among Canadian workers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 36(1), 5-20.


Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76-88.


Harris, K. J., Harris, R. B., Carlson, J. R., & Carlson, D. S. (2015). Resource loss from technology overload and its impact on work-family conflict: Can leaders help?. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 411-417.


Kinnunen, U., Feldt, T., de Bloom, J., Sianoja, M., Korpela, K., & Geurts, S. (2016). Linking boundary crossing from work to nonwork to work-related rumination across time: A variable-and person-oriented approach. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(4), 467-480.


Kreiner, G. E. (2006). Consequences of work-home segmentation or integration: A person-environment fit perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 485-507.


https://doi.org/ 10.1002/job.386.

Kühnel, J., Vahle-Hinz, T., de Bloom, J., & Syrek, C. J. (2017). Staying in touch while at work: Relationships between personal social media use at work and work-nonwork balance and creativity. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-27.


Lanaj, K., Kim, P. H., Koopman, J., & Matta, F. K. (2018). Daily mistrust: A resource perspective and its implications for work and home. Personnel Psychology, 1-26.


Ma, J. (2017). 25 famous women on guilt. https://www.thecut.com/2017/09/quotes-from-25-famous-women-on-guilt.html. Accessed 5 December 2017.

Matthews, R. A., Kath, L. M., & Barnes-Farrell, J. L. (2010). A Short, valid, predictive measure of work-family conflict: Item selection and scale validation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(1), 75-90.


Noor, N. M., & Mahudin, N. D. M. (2016). Work, family and women's well-being in Malaysia. In Handbook on well-being of working women (pp. 717-734). Springer.


Olson-Buchanan, J. B., Boswell, W. R., & Morgan, T. J. (2016). The role of technology in managing the work and nonwork interface. The Oxford handbook of work and family, (pp. 333-348). New York, NY: Oxford Press.


Park, Y., Fritz, C., & Jex, S. M. (2011). Relationships between work-home segmentation and psychological detachment from work: The role of communication technology use at home. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(4), 457.


Park, Y., & Jex, S. M. (2011). Work-home boundary management using communication and information technology. International Journal of Stress Management, 18(2), 133-152.


Perry-Jenkins, M., & Wadsworth, S. M. (2017). Work and family research and theory: Review and analysis from an ecological perspective. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 9(2), 219-237.


Piszczek, M. M. (2017). Boundary control and controlled boundaries: Organizational expectations for technology use at the work-family interface. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(4), 592-611.


Pluut, H., Ilies, R., Curşeu, P. L., & Liu, Y. (2018). Social support at work and at home: Dual-buffering effects in the work-family conflict process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 146, 1-13..


Rexroth, M., Michel, A., & Bosch, C. (2017). Promoting well-being by teaching employees how to segment their life domains. Zeitschrift fürArbeits-und Organisationspsychologie A&O.


Rothbard, N. P., & Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2016). Boundary management. The Oxford handbook of work and family, (pp. 109-122). New York: Oxford University Press.


Sonnentag, S., Reinecke, L., Mata, J., & Vorderer, P. (2018). Feeling interrupted-Being responsive: How online messages relate to affect at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(3), 369-383.


Syrek, C. J., Kühnel, J., Vahle-Hinz, T., & De Bloom, J. (2017). Share, like, twitter, and connect: Ecological momentary assessment to examine the relationship between non-work social media use at work and work engagement. Work & Stress, 1-19.


Wajcman, J., Bittman, M., & Brown, J. E. (2008). Families without borders: Mobile phones, connectedness and work-home divisions. Sociology, 42(4), 635-652.


Wilkinson, K., Tomlinson, J., & Gardiner, J. (2017). Exploring the work-life challenges and dilemmas faced by managers and professionals who live alone. Work, Employment and Society, 31(4), 640-656.


How to Cite
Omar Lim, S. L. (2019). Daily Smartphone Use for Work and Its Effect on Work-Life Conflict among Integrators . Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, 5(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.1915.2019