Preliminary Analysis of Employee Needs Inventory Assessment (ENAI): Reliability and Validity

  • Mohd Razali Othman UNIMAS
  • Nor Mazlina Ghazali UNIMAS
  • Suraida Abdullah UNIMAS
  • Mohd Izzat Syafiq Mohd Razali UNIMAS

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop and assess the validity and reliability of Employee Needs Assessment Inventory (ENAI). Employee Needs Assessment Inventory (ENAI) aims to screen employees’ problem and measured eight scale namely health, financial, family, spiritual, work, career, interpersonal relationship and work environment. The instrument is developed based on Ecological Theory by Bronfenbrenner (1979). The questionnaire is distributed to 1113 employees in selected public university in Malaysia. The reliability of the instrument is measured using internal consistence reliability (Cronbach Alpha). The construct validity is measured by Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). The result indicated a coefficient alpha is 0.96 for the 76 ENAI items. The coefficient alphas for the eight subscales were as follows: 0.89 for health, 0.79 for financial, 0.86 for family, 0.83 for spiritual, 0.88 for work, 0.85 for career, 0.90 for interpersonal relationship and 0.89 for work environment. The study founds the instrument is valid and reliable.

Keywords: Reliability; Validity; Assessment; Employee; Exploratory factor analysis

References

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.

Carr, J. L., & Hellan, R. T., (1980). Improving Corporate Performance Through Employee Assistance Program. Bussiness horizons, 23, 57

Chi, C. G., & Gursoy, D. (2009). Employee satisfaction, customer satisfaction, and financial performance: An empirical examination. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28, 245-253.

Choi, S., & Whitford A. B. (2017). Employee satisfaction in agencies with merit-based pay: Differential effects for three measures. International Public Management Journal, 20(3), 422-466.

Conyne, R. & Cook, E. (Eds.). (2004). Ecological counseling: An innovative approach to conceptualizing person-environment interaction. Alexandria, VA: American Counselling Association.

Cook, E. P. (2012). Understanding people in contect the Ecological Perspective in Counseling. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association

Couper, M. P. 2000. Web-based surveys: A review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly. 64(4): 464–494

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.

Dawes, J. (2008). “Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used?”. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 61-77.

Dubreuil, E. & Krause, N. (1983). Employee assistance program: Industrial and clinical perspectives. New directions for mental health services, 20, 85-94

Employee Assistance Professionals Association (EAPA). (1996). Employee Assistance Backgrounder. Arlington, VA: EAPA

Evans, J. R. & Mathur, A. (2005). The value of online surveys. Internet Research 15(2): 195–219.

Fink, A. (1995) How to ask survey questions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Gabčanová, I. (2011). The employees – The most important asset in the organizations. Human Resources Management & Ergonomics, 5, 1-12.

Gregory, K. (2011). The Importance of Employee Satisfaction. Retrieved October 6, 2017 from http://www.neumann.edu/about/ publications/NeumannBusinessREview/ journal/Review2011/ Gregory.pdf

Hartwell, T. D., Steele, P., French, M. T., Potter, F. J., Rodman, N. F., & Zarkin, G. A. (1996). Aiding troubled employees: The prevalence, cost, and characteristics of employee assistance programs in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 86(6), 804–808.

Hinton, P. R., Brownlow, C., McMurray, I., & Cozens, B. (2005). SPSS explained. London & NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Johnson, A. T., & o’Neil, N, (1989). Employee assistance program and the troubled employee in the public sector workplace. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 9, 66-81

Liao S., Hu D., Chung Y., & Chen L. (2017). LMX and employee satisfaction: mediating effect of psychological capital. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(3), 433-449.

Miller, M. (2012). “res 600: Graduate research methods: Reliability and validity,” Western international university. Available at: http://michaeljmillerphd.com/res500_lecturenotes /Reliability_and_Validity.pdf

Othman, Ghazali, Annuar, Ishak, & Thomas. (2003). Enai: An instrument to identify employees’ problems in organization. In problem management related to psychology at workplace seminar. Universiti utara malaysia.

Office for Disability Employment Policy. (2009). Employee Assistance Programs for a New Generation of Employees. Retrieved October 6, 2017 from https://www.dol.gov/odep/ documents/employeeassistance.pdf

Rodgers, B. E. (2009). An Ecological Approach to Understanding the Stigma Associated with Receiving Mental Health Services: The Role of Social Proximity. (Unpublished Ph.D thesis). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.

Roman, P.M., Blum T. C., & Bennett, M. (1987). Educating organizational consumers about employee assistance programs. Public Personnel Management, 16, 299-312.

Sekaran, U. (2000). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, John Wiley and Sons.

Van der Voordt, T. J. M. (2003). Productivity and employee satisfaction in flexible workplaces. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 6(2), 133-148.

Van Dick, R. & Monzani, L. (2017). Does it matter whether i am a happy and committed worker? The role of identification, commitment and job satisfaction for employee behaviour, in an introduction to work and organizational psychology: An international perspective (ed N. Chmiel), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Oxford, UK.

Weible, R. & Wallace, J. (1998). The impact of the internet on data collection. Marketing Research. 10(3): 19–23.

Published
2020-03-31
How to Cite
Othman, M. R., Ghazali, N. M., Abdullah, S., & Mohd Razali, M. I. S. (2020). Preliminary Analysis of Employee Needs Inventory Assessment (ENAI): Reliability and Validity . Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, 6(1), 88-101. https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.1752.2020