Reading Skills in English using Jolly Phonics at a Chinese Primary School
Abstract
This study investigates the viability of using a phonics programme for Primary One students who are studying at a National Type Chinese School in Sarawak, Malaysia. Jolly Phonics is a Synthetic Phonics Programme that is used to address common reading problems. In this study, Primary One students who learn Mandarin as their main language in school, while learning English and Malay Languages at the same time. The phonics consists of teaching reading with five skills, namely learning the letter sounds, letter formation, blending, segmenting and tricky words. 39 students participated in the study. Two groups were formed to compare performances between those who used the phonic programme and those who attended the regular English classes. Data was collected on pre and post-test achievements for both the experimental and control group. Findings revealed that the phonics programme did not significantly impact the students’ reading ability when compared with performances of those who attended regular lessons which used existing methods of teaching reading skills for English language learning at the Chinese medium school.
Keywords: Night reading ability; non-native English language learners; phonics; Chinese school; foreign language learning
References
Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Bald, J. (2007). Using phonics to teach reading and spelling London: Paul Chapman.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446214480
Callinan, C., & Zee, E. Van Der. (2010). How to read : Jolly Phonics and THRASS, 34(1), 21-31.
https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsper.2010.34.1.21
Cimmiyotti, C. B. (2013). Impact of Reading Ability on Academic Performance at the Primary Level. (Unpublished master's thesis). Dominican University of California.
Ehri, L.C., Nunes, S.R., Willows, D.M., Schuster, B.V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250-287.
https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.36.3.2
Ekpo, C. M. (1999). Strategies for the development and sustenance of reading culture in Nigeria. JETT 1, P 43 - 48
Foxcroft. G., Chapple, N. (2007). The potential for synthetic phonics to raise literacy levels in Africa. Paper presented at the 5th Pan-African Literacy Conference, Legon, Accra.
Gregg, G.H. (1954). Some Characteristics of Instruction in the Three R's as Observed in 242 Classrooms in 65 Schools in 28 States. Master's thesis. Berkeley: University of California, 34 p.
Hiebert, E., & Pearson, P.D. (2000). Building on the past, bridging to the future: A research agenda for the center for the improvement of early reading achievement. Ann Arbor, MI: CIERA University of Michigan.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670009598702
Johnston, R., & Watson, J. (2005). Insight 17 A Seven Year Study of the Effects of Synthetic Phonics Teaching on Reading. Insight: Scottish Executive Education Department, 1(17), 1-8.
Lim, T.D., Varghese, M. (2013). Analyzing Malaysian English Classrooms:Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening Teaching Strategies. University of Washington.
Lloyd, S. and Wernham, S. (2012). The phonics handbook: A handbook for teaching reading, writing and spelling. (4th Edition) Jolly Learning Ltd. Chigwell, England.
Pearson, P.D. (2001). Reading in the twentieth century. Ann Arbor, MI: CIERA University of Michigan.
Reyhner, J., & Hurtado, D. (2008). Reading First, Literacy, and American Indian/Alaska Native Students. Journal of American Indian Education, 47(1), 82-95.
Ruiz, C. C. (2014). Is it all about Jolly Phonics? [Online]. https://studylib.es/doc/5561723/is-it-all-about-jolly-phonics%3F
Schagen, I., & Shamsan, Y. (2007). Analysis of Hyderabad Data from" Jolly Phonics" Initiative to Investigate Its Impact on Pupil Progress in Reading and Spelling-India. National Foundation for Educational Research.
Snow, C.E, Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. (eds.) (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 432 pp.
Shaywitz, Sally (2003). Overcoming Dyslexia: A new and complete science-based program for reading problems at any level. New York: Vintage Books.Callinan, C., & Zee, E. Van Der. (2010). how to read : Jolly Phonics and THRASS, 34(1), 21-31
https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsper.2010.34.1.21
Soiferman, L. K. (2016). Literature-Based vrs. Controlled-Vocabulary Approach for Beginning Readers. Online Submission. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED571529
Smith, F. (1971). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Wernham, S., Lloyd, S., & Stephen, L. (2010). Jolly Phonics. Jolly Learning.
Wyse, D., & Goswami, U. (2008). Synthetic phonics and the teaching of reading. British Educational Research JournalOnline) Journal British Educational Research Journal, 346(December), 141-1926.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
4) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
5) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
