• Thiennieesh Manogaran School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Penang, Malaysia
  • Mohd Remy Rozainy Mohd Arif Zainol School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Penang, Malaysia
  • Muhammad Khairi A. Wahab School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Penang, Malaysia
  • Mohd Sharizal Abdul Aziz School of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Penang, Malaysia
  • Nazirul Mubin Zahari Department of Civil Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Putrajaya, Malaysia
Keywords: stilling basin, spillway, dam, baffle, energy dissipation, flow behaviour


Water flowing over a spillway has a very high kinetic energy because of the conversion of the entire potential energy to kinetic energy. This circumstance results in damage or significant erosion at the toes of the spillways, weir bed, and downstream of a river. To solve this problem, the water flow velocity must be minimised. Physical modelling was implemented to this conundrum in order to modify the current energy dissipating structure, the stilling basin, to enhance energy dissipation as much as achievable by downstream velocity reduction. Baffle blocks were adopted as the modification in this study because these are widely used to stabilize the jumps, shorten its length, and maximize energy dissipation. A selection of baffle arrangements was evaluated by positioning them in the stilling basin’s mid-span to identify the most effective outcome in minimizing downstream velocity. From the findings, it was clearly shown the arrangement of baffles blocks at the stilling basin impacts velocity reduction in various discharge cases. The formation of cross-waves was also assessed at the discharge channel at every discharge value with its relative distance from the sump and the width of the channel prior to the site. For discharge situations of 70.0 L/s and 100.0 L/s, modifications to the Type II stilling basin were recommended. Furthermore, constriction, expansion, or curvature should be avoided in chute spillways identical to the dam spillway to limit cross-wave generation and other unfavourable flow behaviours.


Rong, Y., Zhang, T., Peng, L., & Feng, P. (2019). Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dam discharge and flood routing in Wudu reservoir. Water, 11(10), 2157.

Razzak Al-Husseini, T. (2015). Experimental study of increasing energy dissipation on stepped spillway. Journal of Kerbala University, 11(1), 87-100.

Hayder, A. M., & Jafar, M. S. (2015). Investigation of energy dissipation in stepped spillway with semicircular steps treads. Asian Transactions on Engineering, 5(3), 1–5.

Ammar, H. K., Isam, M. A., & Zainab, T. (2016). Study the effect of spillway locations on the hydraulic properties of spillway. Ciência e Técnica Vitivinícola, 31(5), 90–106.

Nigam, U., Das, S., & Choudhury, M. R. (2016). Overview of energy dissipators and stilling basins with design aspects of hydraulic jump type energy dissipators. Conference Proc NCIET.

Abdel Aal, G. M., Sobeah, M., Helal, E., & El-Fooly, M. (2018). Improving energy dissipation on stepped spillways using breakers. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 9(4), 1887–1896.

Daneshfaraz, R., & Ghaderi, A. (2017). Numerical investigation of inverse curvature ogee spillway. Civil Engineering Journal, 3(11), 1146–1156.

Gu, S., Ren, L., Wang, X., Xie, H., Huang, Y., Wei, J., & Shao, S. (2017). SPHysics simulation of experimental spillway hydraulics. Water, 9(12), 973.

Orekhov, G. (2018). Hydraulic spillways using the effect of interacting circulation currents. IOP Conference Series. Materials Science and Engineering, 365, 042023.

Hien, L. T. T. (2020). Study the flow over chute spillway by both numerical and physical models. In APAC 2019 Springer Singapore, 845–851.

Ghazi, B., Daneshfaraz, R., & Jeihouni, E. (2019). Numerical investigation of hydraulic characteristics and prediction of cavitation number in Shahid Madani Dam's Spillway. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 7(4), 323-332.

Nouri, M., Sihag, P., Salmasi, F., & Kisi, O. (2020). Energy loss in skimming flow over cascade spillways: Comparison of artificial intelligence-based and regression methods. Applied Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 10(19), 6903.

Abbas, A. S., Alwash, H. H., & Mahmood, A. H. (2018). Effect of baffle block configurations on characteristics of hydraulic jump in adverse stilling basins. MATEC Web of Conferences, 162, 26–32. https://doi:10.1051/matecconf/201816203005

Chatila, J. G., & Jurdi, B. R. (2004). Stepped spillway as an energy dissipater. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 29(3), 147–158.

Yang, C. S., Kao, S. -P. &., Lee, F. B., & Hung, P. -S. (2004). Twelve different interpolation methods: A case study of Surfer 8.0. In Proceedings of the XXth ISPRS Congress, 35, 778–785.

Li, Q., Li, L., & Liao, H. (2018). Study on the best depth of stilling basin with shallow-water cushion. Water, 10(12), 1801.

Ahmed, S. S., & Aziz, Y. W. (2018). Evaluation of hydraulic performance of Nazanin dam side channel spillway. Zanco Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 30(1), 62-69.

Nunes, A. F. P. (2017). Computational modelling of skimming flow over stepped spillways with sidewall convergence.

Dehdar-Behbahani, S., & Parsaie, A. (2016). Numerical modeling of flow pattern in dam spillway’s guide wall. Case study: Balaroud dam, Iran. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 55(1), 467-473.

Mahtabi, G., Chaplot, B., Azamathulla, H. M., & Pal, M. (2020). Classification of hydraulic jump in rough beds. Water, 12(8), 2249.

How to Cite
Manogaran, T., Mohd Arif Zainol, M. R. R., A. Wahab, M. K., Abdul Aziz, M. S., & Zahari, N. M. (2022). ASSESSMENT OF FLOW CHARACTERISTICS ALONG THE HYDRAULIC PHYSICAL MODEL OF A DAM SPILLWAY. Journal of Civil Engineering, Science and Technology, 13(1), 69-79.