ENHANCING ENGLISH CONDITIONAL SENTENCES AMONG EFL UNDERGRADUATES THROUGH SCAFFOLDING TECHNIQUES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.5712.2024Keywords:
EFL students, grammatical knowledge, if-conditionals, scaffolding techniquesAbstract
Students have the potential to progress to a higher level in their language learning and development. To test this hypothesis, this research aims to 1) examine how scaffolding techniques improve English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students’ understanding of conditional sentences, and 2) investigate the students’ attitudes towards the use of scaffolding techniques in the if-conditional instruction. The participants were 27 English major students in a public university in Thailand. Two instruments were used to collect the data: two sets of tests on conditional sentences and a questionnaire. The data were analysed by using the SPSS software (version 20) and were converted into mean scores and standard deviations. The results from a paired t-test demonstrated that there were significant differences between the pre-test and post-test. Thus, it can be indicated that scaffolding techniques, namely, conceptual, metacognitive, strategic, and procedural could reinforce the students’ grammatical knowledge of conditional sentences. Additionally, the results from the questionnaire acknowledged that the students had positive attitudes towards the use of scaffolding techniques in the if-conditional instruction. Therefore, scaffolding techniques can be regarded as effective techniques that help EFL students overcome their grammatical difficulties with if-conditionals and reach higher achievement in their language learning.
References
Alkurdi, R., & Alghazo, S. (2021). Teacher’s misbehaviours in class and students’ reactions: A case study. IAFOR Journal of Education: Language Learning in Education, 9(3), 97-114. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.9.3
Bekiryazici, M. (2015) Teaching mixed-level classes with a Vygotskian perspective. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186(13), 913-917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.163
Berenji, S. (2021). Enhancing metacognitive scaffolding and comprehension ability through problem-based learning in an EFL context. Education Research International, 2021, Article ID 6766793, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6766793
Boobyer, V. (2016). English for everyone course book: Level 4 advanced. Dorling Kindersley Limited.
Boonmoh, A., & Jumpakate, T. (2019). Using scaffolded instructions to improve
students’ skills. rEFLections, 26(6), 1-16.
Cronk, B. C. (2019). How to use SPSS®: A step-by-step guide to analysis and interpretation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429340321
Echevarria, J., Vogt, M. E., & Short, D. J. (2010). Making content comprehensible for secondary English learners: The SIOP model. Pearson Education.
Fatimah, S. (2019). Analysing students’ problems in understanding and constructing English conditional sentences [Bachelor’s thesis, University in Banda Aceh]. Banda Aceh. https://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/id/eprint/11245/
Haman, E., Wodniecka, Z., Marecka, M., Szewczyk, J., Białecka-Pikul, M., Otwinowska, A.,
Mieszkowska, K., Łuniewska, M., Kołak, J., Miekisz, A., Kacprzak, A., Banasik, N.,
& Forys-Nogala, M. (2017). How does L1 and L2 exposure impact L1 performance in bilingual children? Frontier in Psychology, 8, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01444
Hannafin, M. J., Land, S., & Oliver, K. M. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: Volume II (pp. 115-140). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hart, C. (2016). English for everyone practice book: Level 4 advanced. Dorling Kindersley Limited.
Jafari, S., Talebinejad, M. R., & Ketabi, S. (2021). Comparative effects of technology, motivational, and metacognitive-based scaffolding on male and female Iranian adult advanced EFL learners’ speaking. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 9(2), 259-282. https://dx.doi.org/10.30486/relp.2021.1912273.1229
Jiang, Q. (2018). The practice of English listening comprehension teaching. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Humanities Sciences, Management and Education Technology (HSMET 2018), 237, 543-546. https://doi.org/10.2991/hsmet-18.2018.108
Johnson, G. (2016). English for everyone course book: Level 3 intermediate. Dorling Kindersley Limited.
Kampookaew, P. (2020). An analysis of grammatical errors made by Thai EFL university students in an EAP writing class: Issues and recommendations. rEFLections, 27(2), 246-273.
Katip, P. (2015). Thai EFL learners’ comprehension and production of English if-conditionals [Master’s thesis, Thammasat University]. Bangkok. http://ethesisarchive.library.tu.ac.th/thesis/2015/TU_2015_5621030559_4756_2822.pdf
Katip, P., & Gampper, C. (2016). English as a foreign language student productive conditional verb form errors in Thailand. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network Journal, 9(2), 1-13.
Kholilah, N. (2020). Students’ errors in using conditional sentences at SMK Farmasi Ikasari Pekanbaru [Bachelor’s thesis, State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau]. Riau. http://repository.uin-suska.ac.id/29019/2/UPLOAD.pdf
Khumphee, S., & Yodkamlue, B. (2017). Grammatical errors in English essays written by Thai EFL undergraduate students. Journal of Education, Mahasarakham University, 11(4), 139-154.
Kim, N., Belland, B. R., & Axelrod, D. (2019). Scaffolding for optimal challenge in K-12 problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1712
MacKay, B. (2016). English for everyone practice book: Level 3 intermediate. Dorling Kindersley Limited.
Majid, A. H. A., & Stapa, S. H. (2017). The use of scaffolding technique via Facebook in improving descriptive writing among ESL learners. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 23(4), 77-88. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2304-07
Piamsai, C. (2020). The effect of scaffolding on non-proficient EFL learners’ performance in an academic writing class. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network Journal, 13(2), 288-305.
Promsupa, P., Varasarin, P., & Brudhiprabha, P. (2017). An analysis if grammatical errors in English writing of Thai university students. HRD Journal, 8(1), 93-104.
Rahmat, N. H., Aripin, N., Razlan, Z., & Khairuddin, Z. (2021). The influence of metacognitive scaffolding on learning academic writing online. International Journal of Education, 13(3), 48-63. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v13i3.18902
Rdaat, S., & Gardner, S. (2017). An analysis of use of conditional sentences by Arab students of English. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(2), 1-13. https://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.2p.1
Rezaee, A. A., Farahani, A. A. K., & Mubarak, L. A. (2018). Scaffolding and EFL learners’ use of language learning strategies in the Iraqi language teaching context. Teaching English Language, 12(2), 89-116. https://dx.doi.org/10.22132/TEL.2018.75382
Richards, J. C., & Reppen, R. (2014). Towards pedagogy of grammar instruction. RELC Journal, 45(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214522622
Saengboon, S. (2017). English grammar and Thai university students: An insurmountable linguistic battle? English Language Teaching, 10(11), 22-36. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n11p22
Safa, M. A., & Motaghi, F. (2021). Cognitive vs. metacognitive scaffolding strategies and EFL learners’ listening comprehension development. Language Teaching Research, 28(3), 987-1010. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211021821
Safdari, S., Ghadiri, M., & Kashkouli, Z. (2019). The types of scaffolding used by EFL teachers in Isfahan. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 8(2), 199-220. https://dx.doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2020.11753.1462
Sari, D. K., & Rozimela, Y. (2020). The implementation of scaffolding strategies at speaking English course in Kampung Inggris Pare East Java. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language and Arts, 539, 51-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210325.010
Sözen, E., & Güven, U. (2019). The effect of online assessments on students’ attitudes towards undergraduate-level geography courses. International Education Studies, 12(10), 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n10p1
Spycher, P. (2017). Scaffolding writing through the “teaching and learning cycle”. WestEd.
Taka, S. D. (2020). The efficacy of using pair work technique in teaching conditional sentences to Indonesian English as Foreign Language (EFL) students. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 8(2), 602-610. http://dx.doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v8i2.1690
Thuratham, W. (2022). Individual, pair and group EFL activities for aviation students at a Thai university: A closer look at language achievement and attitudes. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network Journal, 15(2), 892-921.
Viriyapanyanont, T. (2021). Scaffolding improving vocabulary skill and enhancing reading confidence: The scaffolding reading approach. Journal of Legal Entity Management and Local Innovation, 7(5), 311-326.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Watcharakorn, W. (2018). Effect of guided inductive and deductive instruction on grammar learning in an EFL context. [Master’s thesis, Prince of Songkla University]. Thailand. https://kb.psu.ac.th/psukb/bitstream /2016/12834/1/432443.pdf
Yossatorn, Y., Binali, T., Chokthawikit, S., & Weng, C. (2022). Thai EFL university students’ productions of the English past counterfactuals and their influences from interlanguage fossilization. SAGE Open, 12(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079892
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 UNIMAS Publisher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
