Writers’ Awareness of Metadiscourse Features in Malaysian Business News

  • Chee Mei Hooi Faculty of Creative Industries, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman
  • Helen Tan Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Geok Imm Lee Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Sharon Sharmini Victor Danarajan Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia
Keywords: business news; linguistic resource; metadiscourse; Metadiscourse Awareness Test; writers

Abstract

Metadiscourse is an important linguistic resource in business news because it guides readers throughout the text. Business news is vital to keep people abreast of how the economy affects job opportunities, how high or low interest rates may go, and whether layoffs are imminent in local industries. However, it is the news that people read the least because it is not engaging to them. The study aims to investigate The Star Online and Focus Malaysia business news writers’ awareness on the use of metadiscourse features. Metadiscourse Awareness Test was given to 10 business news writers from The Star Online and Focus Malaysia respectively. The findings showed that sequencers had the lowest mean score (M=2.334) for textual metadiscourse, while certainty markers had the lowest mean score (M=2.667) for interpersonal metadiscourse. Although The Star Online and Focus Malaysia writers exhibited the lowest mean score in identifying sequencers and certainty markers, they still demonstrated a high awareness in identifying all the categories of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse. The findings revealed the importance of metadiscourse features for the business news writers to fully utilise them in the news industry.

Author Biographies

Chee Mei Hooi, Faculty of Creative Industries, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman

Department of Modern Languages and Assistant Professor

Helen Tan, Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia

Department of English and Associate Professor

Geok Imm Lee, Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia

Department of English and Senior Lecturer

Sharon Sharmini Victor Danarajan, Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia

Department of English and Senior Lecturer

References

Abdullah, N. A. A., Rahmat, N. H., & Zawawi, F. Z. (2020). Interactional discourse analysis of Malaysian and South Korean newspaper articles on online learning during COVID-19. European Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies, 3(1), 1-16.

Beziat, T. L. R. (2012). The testing effects and judgments of learning: Their effects on reading comprehension [Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University of Ohio]. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_etd/send_file/send?accession=kent1332772478&disposition=inline

Boshrabadi, A. M., Biria, R., & Zavari, Z. (2014). A cross-cultural analysis of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers: The case of economic articles in English and Persian newspapers. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(2), 59-66.

Bowman, S., & Willis, C. (2003). We media: How audiences are shaping the future of news and information. The Media Center at the American Press Institute. http://www.hypergene.net/wemedia/weblog.php

Clark, L. S., & Marchi, R. (2017). Young people and the future of the news. Cambridge University Press.

Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 95-113.

Derrick, B., Toher, D., & White, P. (2017). How to compare the means of two samples that include paired observations and independent observations. The Quantitative Methods in Psychology, 13(2), 1-12.

Farahani, M. V. (2018). The usage and distributional pattern of metadiscourse features in research articles in Applied Linguistics based on Hyland’s classification. Applied Linguistic Research Journal, 2(1), 35-51.

Farnia, M., & Mohammadi, N. (2018). Cross-cultural analysis of interpersonal metadiscourse markers in persuasive local newspaper articles. Discourse and Interaction, 11(2), 27-44.

Ghazaei, M., Khaki, M., Naderi, S., & Shams, S. (2016). The study of relationship between the awareness level of management tasks with self-efficacy in sport managers of Isfahan City. Bulletin de la Société Royale des Sciences de Liège, 85, 678-689.

Hashemi, M. R., & Golparvar, S. E. (2012). Exploring metadiscourse markers in Persian news reports. International Journal of Social Science Tomorrow, 1(2), 1-6.

Hewitt, J. (2002). Air words: Writing for broadcast news (3rd ed.). The McGraw-Hill Education.

Higgins, E., & Tatham, L. (2003). Exploring the potential of multiple-choice questions in assessment. Learning & Teaching in Action, 2(1), 1-12.

Hoque, R. (2017). Satisfaction with and perceptions of news media performance with alienation from government and business corporations: An Ohio case study [Master’s thesis, Bowling Green State University]. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/ apexprod/rws_etd/send_file/send?accession=bgsu1557843668747244&disposition=inline

Hudson, G., & Rowlands, S. (2012). Broadcast journalism handbook (2nd ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177.

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.

Hyland, K., Wang, W., & Jiang, F. K. (2022). Metadiscourse across languages and genres: An overview. Lingua, 264, 1-20.

Itule, B. D., & Anderson, D. A. (2008). News writing & reporting for today’s media. McGraw-Hill Companies.

Karakus, N. (2020). EFL teachers’ awareness and attitude towards personal and impersonal metadiscourse markers in L2 academic writing [Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University]. https://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12625206/index.pdf

Khattak, H. K., Yaqoob, S., & Basri, R. (2003). Communication skills module. http://www.hec.gov.pk/InsideHEC/Divisions/LearningInnovation/Documents/Learning%20Portal/NAHE/communication%20skills%20module.pdf

Kuhi, D., & Mojood, M. (2014). Metadiscourse in newspaper genre: A cross-linguistic study of English and Persian editorials. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1046-1055.

Mardani, T. (2017). Metadiscourse markers: A contrastive study of translated and non-translated persuasive texts. Journal of Languages and Translation, 7(2), 73-79.

Mencher, M. (2011). Melvin Mencher’s news reporting and writing. The McGraw-Hill Education.

Moghadam, F. D. (2017). Persuasion in journalism: A study of metadiscourse in texts by native speakers of English and Iranian EFL writers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(6), 483-495.

Noorian, M., & Biria, R. (2010). Interpersonal metadiscourse in persuasive journalism: A study of texts by American and Iranian EFL columnists. Journal of Modern Languages, 20(1), 64-79.

Nugrahani, V. E., & Bram, B. (2020). Meta-discourse markers in scientific journal articles. Journal of the Association for Arabic and English, 6(1), 1-16.

Nugroho, A. (2020). Investigating the use of metadiscourse markers by American and Indonesian writers in opinion and business articles. Journal of English Language and Culture, 10(2), 75-87.

Oeldorf-Hirsh, A. (2011). Engagement with news content in online social networks [Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University]. Electronic Theses and Dissertations for Graduate School. https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/12094

Pronmas, P. (2020). Metadiscourse in postgraduate writing [Master’s Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington]. https://openaccess.wgtn.ac.nz/ articles/thesis/Metadiscourse_in_postgraduate_writing/17147801

Ryan, M., & Tankard Jr. J. W. (2005). Writing for print and digital media. McGraw-Hill.

Sahin, S. (2019). An analysis of English language testing and evaluation course in English language teacher education programs in Turkey: Developing language assessment literacy of pre-service EFL teachers [Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University]. https://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12622940/index.pdf

Taber, K. S. (2017). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in Science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273-1296.

Treptow, M. A., Burns, M. K., & McComas, J. J. (2007). Reading at the frustration, instructional, and independent levels: The effects on students’ reading comprehension and time on task. School Psychology Review, 36(1), 159-166.

Vegada, B., Shukla, A., Khilnani, A., Charan, J., & Desai, C. (2016). Comparison between three option, four option and five option multiple choice questions for quality parameters: A randomized study. Indian Journal of Pharmacology, 48(5), 571-575.

Xi, C. (2020). Metadiscourse in corporate press releases. 3rd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Social Sciences & Humanities (pp. 37-43). Francis Academic Press.https://webofproceedings.org/proceedingsseries/ESSP/SOSHU%202020/SOSHU20008.pdf

Published
2022-06-27
How to Cite
Hooi, C. M., Tan, H., Lee, G. I., & Victor Danarajan, S. S. (2022). Writers’ Awareness of Metadiscourse Features in Malaysian Business News . Issues in Language Studies, 11(1), 165-182. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.4480.2022