Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Morfologi bahasa Arab bersifat kompleks berbanding morfologi bahasa lain. Hal ini kerana sistem morfologinya berasaskan kepada kata akar dan pelbagai lapisan proses derivasi (perubahan bentuk kata). Penentuan kata akar daripada perkataan berimbuhan Arab antara kesukaran pelajar bahasa Arab lebih-lebih lagi jika struktur dalaman sesuatu perkataan mengalami banyak derivasi. Justeru, kajian ini melaporkan kesahihan konstruksi dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen rintis bagi mengukur kesukaran struktur dalaman kata (SDK) imbuhan bahasa Arab. Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif. Ujian Struktur Dalaman Kata Imbuhan (USDAi) mengandungi 130 item aneka pilihan yang dibentuk berdasarkan teori SDK dan teori paradigmatis serta konsep derivasi bahasa Arab. Pemilihan sampel kajian menggunakan pensampelan bertujuan bersasar. Seramai 45 orang pelajar dari Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor (KUIS) dipilih sebagai responden. Data dianalisis menggunakan Model Pengukuran Rasch. Nilai indeks kebolehpercayaan person ialah 0.95 (α = 0.97) dan indeks pengasingan pula ialah 4.33. Item pula menunjukkan nilai kebolehpercayaan 0.87, indeks pengasingan 2.65 dan mean infit 0.97. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan 130 item USDAi produktif bagi mengukur struktur dalaman kata (SDK) imbuhan bahasa Arab. Kajian ini turut memberi implikasi terhadap pembelajaran morfologi Arab agar penguasaan struktur dalaman kata perlu dikuasai oleh para pelajar.
References
Abu Bakar, K. (2008). Rasch calibration of Arabic reading diagnostic test items. International Islamic University.
Abu Bakar, K., & Hassan, S. H. (2011). Applying the Rasch model in educational researches. In F. A. Rahman, F. Piee@Shafiee, & H. Elias (Eds.), Teachers' learning curriculum innovations and knowledge applications (pp. 110-127). UPM Press.
Alderson, J. C. (1998). Developments in language testing and assessment, with specific reference to Information Technology. Forum for Modern Language Studies, 2, 195-206.
https://doi.org/10.1093/fmls/XXXIV.2.195
Alderson, J. C., & Banerjee, J. (2001). Language testing and assessment (Part I). Language Teaching, 34(4), 213-236.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800014464
Allan, A. (1992). Development and validation of a scale to measure test-wiseness in EFL/ESL reading test-takers. Language Testing, 9, 101-122.
https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229200900201
Al-Hafiz Abd al-Rahim, A.-S. (2006). Mabadi' Ta'lim al-Lughah al-Arabiyyah li Ghair al-Natiqin biha (1st ed.). Jidaran lil kitab al-Alami
Al-Najem, S. R. (2007). Inheritance-based approach to Arabic verbal root-and-pattern morphology. In A. Soudi, A. van den Bosch & G. Neumann (Eds.), Arabic computational morphology (pp. 67-88). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6046-5_5
Asbulah, L. H., Lubis, M. A., & Aladdin, A. (2018). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen pengetahuan kolokasi Bahasa Arab IPT (I-KAC IPT) menggunakan model pengukuran Rasch. Asean Comparative Education Research Journal On Islam And Civilization (ACER-J). EISSN2600-769X, 2(1), 97-106.
Azami, Z., Afida, A., Mohd Zaidi, O., & Norazreen, A. A. (2019). Pengukuran terhadap penilaian psikometri. In M. N. Zulkifli, O. Siti Aminah & A. Norhana (Eds.), Pengukuran Rasch dalam penilaian hasil pembelajaran pendidikan kejuruteraan (Pertama, pp. 102-189). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Aziz, A. A., Masodi, M. S., & Zaharim, A. (2017). Asas model pengukuran Rasch: Pembentukan skala & struktur pengukuran (ke3 ed.). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Baharudin, H., Ismail, Z., & Nik Yusoff, N. M. R. (2017). Pembinaan ujian tahap saiz kosa kata Arab the construction exam level size of Arabic vocabulary. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 42(1), 13-19.
Bloomfield, L. (1970). Language. George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, M. C. (2015). Applying The Rasch model fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Booij, G. E. (2015). The structure of words. In The Oxford Handbook of the Word (Issue December, pp. 1-19). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641604.013.002
Buckwalter, T., & Parkinson, D. (2011). A frequency dictionary of Arabic: Core vocabulary for learners. Routledge.
Clapham, C. (2000). Assessment and testing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 147-161.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500200093
Cumming, A. (1996). Introduction: The concept of validation in language testing. In A. Cumming & R. Berwick (Eds.), Validation in language testing. Multilingual Matters.
Fisher, W. P. (2007). Rating scale instrument quality criteria. Rasch Measurement Transcations, 21(1), 1095.
George, R. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. The University of Chicago Press.
Ghizawiy, B. (2008). Mucjam Tasrif al-'Afcal al-Madrasiy. Dar al-cIlmi al-Malayiyin.
Gregory, C., Charlotte, A., & Slki, L. (2013). Measurement in education in the United States. Oxford University Press.
Hassan Basri, A. M. D. (2002). Language testing: The construction and validation. University of Malaya Press.
Khoiry, M. A., Nik Ibrahim, N. L., Osman, M. H., & Hamzah, N. (2019). Isu Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Penilaian Pelajar. In Z. M. Nopiah, S. A. Osman, & N. Arsad (Eds.), Pengukuran Rasch dalam penilaian hasil pembelajaran pendidikan kejuruteraan (pp. 190-250). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Kusaeri, S. (2012). Pengukuran dan penilaian pendidikan. Buku Graha Ilmu, 1(1), 1-10. info@grahailmu.co.id
Linacre, J. M. (1994). Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 7(4), 328.
Linacre, J. M. (2002). Understanding Rasch measurement: Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(1), 85-106.
Linacre, J. M. (2005). A user's guide and program manual to Winsteps: Rasch Model computer program (3.6.1.11). MESA Press.
Linacre, J. M. (2010). Predicting responses from rasch measures. Journal of Applied Measurement, 11(1), 1-10.
Linacre, J. M. (2021). A user's guide to wINSTEPS: Rasch-model computer program (5.0.2.0). MESA Press.
Maeda, J., & Naoumi, E. (2005). Vocabulary Development Using a Questionnaire. In K. Bradford-Watts, C. Ikeguchi, & M. Swanson (Eds.) JALT2004 Conference Proceedings (pp. 732-742). JALT5t.
Maher Syacban, A. al-B. (2011). Taclim al-Mufradat al-Lughawiyyah. Dar al-Musayyarah Li al-Nasyr wa al-Tauzic
Maskor, Z. M., Baharudin, H., & Lubis, M. A. (2018). Measurement validity and reliability of the productive vocabulary knowledge instrument for Arabic learners in Malaysian secondary schools. Advanced Science Letters, 24(5), 3423-3426.
https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.11400
McIntire, S. A., & Miller, L. A. (2007). Foundations of psychological testing: A practical approach (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Jalil, A. M. F. (2012). Penguasaan pelajar STAM terhadap imbuhan kata Bahasa Arab. Universiti Malaya.
Muhammad Ma'sum, A. (1965). al-Amthilah al-Tasrifiyyah Lil Madaris al-Salafiyyah al-Syaficeyyah. Maktabah wa Matbacah Salim Nabhan.
Muhammad Qadur, A. (1999). Madahkhil cIla Fiqh al-Lughah al-cArabiyyah. Dar al-Fikr.
Norazwa, A. R. (2014). Penguasaan pelajar Sarjana Pengajian Islam terhadap Al-'Af'al Al-Mazidah dalam morfologi Arab. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Perneger, T. V., Courvoisier, D. S., Hudelson, P. M., & Gayet-Ageron, A. (2014). Sample size for pre-tests of questionnaires. Quality of Life Research, 24(1), 147-151.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0752-2
Rabiah Tul Adawiyah, M. S., Biase, B. Di, & Wan Nur Madiha, R. (2020). The acquisition of english grammar among malayenglish bilingual primary school children. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 20(4), 166-185.
https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2020-2004-10
Rahman, M. S. (2016). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language "Testing and Assessment" research: A literature review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 102.
https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p102
Rasad, F., & Mahamod, Z. (2013). Analisis kesalahan morfologi dan sintaksis dalam penulisan tesis cemerlang: Satu kajian kes. In Z. Mahamod, A. Ahmad, A. H. Zakaria, N. N. F., Nik Harmi (Eds.), Prosiding Seminar Pascasiswazah Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu & Kesusasteraan Melayu (pp. 311-335). Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Rohaya, T., & Mohd Najib, A. G. (2017). Pembinaan dan pengesahan instrumen bagi mengukur tahap literasi pentaksiran guru sekolah menengah di Malaysia. Noise and Health, 19(89), 165-173.
https://doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_106_16
Rosni, S. (2009). Pendekatan pembelajaran kemahiran bahasa Arab untuk pelajar bukan penutur jati. Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia.
Song, F. (2002). A comparative study on the productive and academic vocabulary knowledge of Japanese and Chinese university students: Focusing on the students' performances in the two vocabulary tests. Journal of International Development and Cooperation, 9(1), 113-127.
Steven, J. R. (2008). Language testing in Asia: Evolution, innovation, and policy challenges. Language Testing, 25(1), 5-13.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532207083741
Tuan Omar, T. N. A., Zailani, S., Abu Bakar, K., Zainal, H., Nawawi, Z., & Nik Farhan, M. (2018). Mengesan kelemahan morfologi Arab melalui ujian diagnostik morfologi Arab (UDMA) di SMK Agama Miri. Prosiding Nadwah Ulama Nusantara (Nun) Viii 2018 Sinergi Ulama Dalam Pemerkasaan Ummah, 803-812.
Tucker, M. A. (2011). The morphosyntax of the Arabic verb: Toward a unified syntax-prosody. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0wx0s7qw
Ullah, U., Ramanair, J., & Rethinasamy, S. (2021). Development and validation of willingness to communicate, language use, and motivation questionnaires. Issue in Language Studies, 10(1), 20-36.
https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.2763.2021
Wolins, L., Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1983). Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78(382), 497.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2288670
Wright & Stone (1979). Test design. MESA Press, 57-70
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.