Does Anonymity Matter? A Discoursal Study of Gender Recognition on Arabic Facebook Comments

  • Nashwan Mustafa Al-Sa'ati Dept. of English, College of Arts, University of Mosul, Iraq
Keywords: gender, textual analysis


This study considered the recognition of persons' gender through the differences of the discoursal features and stylistic choices of their Arabic Facebook comments. Three hundred comments on different topics were collected from same-/cross-sex interactions of friends, acquaintances and relatives having similar educational and social backgrounds and with an age range 20- 50. Some research questions were raised as to whether males and females differed in terms of the discoursal features of their comments as well as the ability to recognize the person's gender on the basis of these features. Accordingly, some hypotheses were formulated, viz. males' and females' comments involved distinguished gendered discoursal features and styles, females behaved in line with maintenance roles while males behaved in line with task- oriented roles, and the persons' gender could be predicted through applying the gendered features they had. The study came up with various conclusions that, to some extent, confirmed the hypotheses stated.


Ahmad, S., Rafiq, M., & Ahmad, S. (2018), Gender disparities in the use of internet among graduate students of a developing society. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 67(4), 226-243.

Arize, E. (1996). Men and women in Interaction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Berchmeir, Z., Dietz-Uhler, B. and Stasser, G. (Eds.) (2011). Strategic Uses of Social Technology: An Interactive Perspective of Social Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Crowston, K. and Kammerer, E. (2010). Communication Style and Gender Differences in Computer- Mediated Communication. Retrieved from https://crowston.

Fischer, A. (2011). Gender in Face-to- Face Communication and CMC. In A. Nicole and Kramer C.: Face- to- Face Communication Over the Internet (pp. 53-79). New York: Cambridge Unversity.

Herring, S. (1995). Men's language on the Internet. (Proceedings of the 2nd Nordic Language and Gender Conference) Retrieved 2017, Aug 17 from

Herring, S. (1996).Posting in a different voice: Gender and ethics in computer- mediated communication. In: C. Ess (Ed.): Philosophical Perspectives on Computer- Mediated Communication (pp.115- 145). Albany: State University of New York Press.

Herring, S. (2000).Gender differences in CMC: Findings and implications. The CPSR Newsletter, 18(1)

Herring, S. (2003).Gender and Power in an Online Communication. In J. Holmes and Meyerhoff, M. (Eds.): The Handbook of Language and Gender (pp.202- 229). New York, NY: Blackwell Publishing.

Herring, S., & Stoerger, S. (2013). Gender and anonymity in Computer-Mediated Communication. In J. Holmes, M. Meyerhoff, & S. Ehrlich, (Eds.): Handbook of Language, Gender and Sexuality (2nd ed.) (pp. 567-586). NJ: Wiley- Blackwell Publishing.

Holmes, J. (2006). Gender Talk at Work. USA: Black Well Publishing.

Kapidzic, S. and Herring, S. (2011). Gender, Communication and Self- Presentation in Teen Chatrooms Revisited: Have Patterns Changed?. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 17(1), 39- 59.

Li, Q. (2005). Gender and CMC: A Review on Conflict and Harassment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(3), 382- 406.

Li, N., & Kirkup, G. (2018). Gender and cultural differences in Internet use: a study of China and the UK.Computers and Education, 48(2), 301-317.

Lin, X., & Wang, X. (2019).Examining gender differences in people's information- sharing decisions on social networking sites. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 45-56.

Miller, J., & Durndell, A. (2004). Gender, Language and Computer- Mediated Communication. In K. Morgan, Sancher, J. Brebbia, C. and Voiskounsky, A. (Eds.): Human Perspectives in the Internet Society: Culture, Psychology and Gender (pp. 235- 244). USA: WIT Press.

Mustafa, B., İrem, H., Kozan, Ö and Kesici, Ş (2018). Gender differences in and the relationships between social anxiety and problematic Internet use: Canonical analysis. The Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(1).

Rollero, C., Daniele, A. and Tartaglia, S. (2019). Do men post and women view? The role of gender, personality and emotions in online social activity. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 13(1), 1

Sambasivan, N. (2019). Moving toward a gender equitable internet. Retrieved from

Savicki, V., Foster, D. and Kelley, M. (2006). Gender, Group Composition and Task Type in Virtual Teams. In M. Davidson & Barrett, M. (Eds.): Gender and Communication Issues at Work (pp. 270- 282). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.

Sussman, N. and Tyson, D. (2000). Sex and power: Gender differences in computer- mediated communication. Computers in Human Behaviour, 16(4), 381- 394.

Thomson, R. (2006). The Effects of Topic of Discussion on Gendered Language in Computer- Mediated Communication Discussion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25(2), 167- 178.

Weatherall, A. (2005). Gender, Language and Discourse. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Yates, S. (1997). Gender, identity and CMC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13 (4), 281- 290.

How to Cite
Al-Sa’ati, N. M. (2019). Does Anonymity Matter? A Discoursal Study of Gender Recognition on Arabic Facebook Comments. Issues in Language Studies, 8(2), 13-31.