Genres apart: School and university writing

  • Su Hie Ting Faculty of Language and Communication, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak

Abstract

This study examined the types of writing emphasised in secondary school and university. The specific aspects studied were the genres that students write best, genres frequently written in school, and genres frequently required in written coursework assignments in university. The data on school writing were obtained from questionnaires distributed to 235 students enrolled in English courses in two Malaysian universities whereas the data on university coursework assignments were obtained through interviews with lecturers in the two universities. The results showed that there is a mismatch between types of writing emphasised in school and university. Students frequently write recount and discussion in school but university coursework frequently requires assignments to be written in the form of research articles and explanations. In view of the different emphases in school and university writing, students entering university have difficulty coping with academic discourse. The findings suggest that it is beneficial to sensitise university students to textual conventions of commonly used academic genres at university to speed up their learning of academic discourse.

References

Cahill, D. (2003). The myth of the "turn" in contrastive rhetoric. Written Communication, 20(2), 170-194.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088303020002003

Cullip, P. F., & Carol, D. (2002). Tailoring an EAP course to disciplinary needs: The UNIMAS effort. The English Teacher, XXVIII [Electronic version]. Retrieved July 23, 2009, from http://www.melta.org.my/ET/2002/wp05.htm

Darus, S., & Kuang, C. H. (2009). Common errors in written English essay of Form one Chinese students: A case study. Eur. J. Soc. Sci., 10(2), 242-253.

Darus, S., & Subramaniam, K. (2009). Error analysis of the written English essays of secondary school students in Malaysia: A case study. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 483-495.

Derewianka, B. (1991). Exploring how texts work. Newtown, New South Wales: Primary English Teaching Association.

Drury, H., & Jones, J. (2010). Transforming the teaching of report writing in science and engineering through an integrated online learning environment, WRiSE (Write Reports in Science and Engineering). In C. H. Steel, M. J. Keppell, P. Gerbic & S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future. Proceedings ascilite Sydney 2010 (pp. 313-323). Accessed April 8, 2013, http://ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney10/procs/Drury-full.pdf

Feez, S. (1998). Text-based syllabus design. Sydney, Australia: Macquarie University.

Flowerdew, L. (2000). Using a genre-based framework to teach organizational structure in academic writing. ELT Journal, 54(4), 369-378.

https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.4.369

Gautreau, A. L., Averett, J. B., Trusock, D., McFerren, S. E., Phipps, C., Lynch. M. … Speer, L. W. (1986). Our readers write: What's a practical idea for teaching organization in writing? The English Journal, 75(5), 61-68. Retrieved October 11, 2012, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/818208.pdf?acceptTC=true

https://doi.org/10.2307/818208

Horowitz, D. M. (1986). What professors actually require: Academic tasks for the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 445- 462.

https://doi.org/10.2307/3586294

Jackson, L., Meyer, W., & Parkinson, J. (2006). A study of the writing tasks and reading assigned to undergraduate science students at a South African University. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 260-281.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.04.003

Jenkins, H. H., & Pico, M. L. (2006). SFL and argumentative essays in ESOL. Proceedings of 33rd International Systemic Functional Congress, 155.

Klein, P. D., & Rose, R. A. (2010). Teaching argument and genre to prepare junior students for writing to learn. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 433-461.

https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.4.4

Liu, L. (2005). Rhetorical education through writing instruction across cultures: A comparative analysis of select online instructional materials on argumentative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(1), 1-18.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.11.001

Malaysian Examinations Council. (2006). Malaysian University English Test. Retrieved November 20, 2012, from http://www.mpm.edu.my/documents/10156/c5c332ab-3d97-4959-83c0-09866eea0774

Maros, M., Tan, K. H., & Salehuddin, K. (2007). Interference in learning English: Grammatical errors in English essay writing among rural Malay secondary schools students in Malaysia. Jurnal e-Bangi, 2(2), 1-15. Accessed May 6, 2013, from http://journalarticle.ukm.my/1539/1/marlyna07.pdf

Marshall, S. (1991). A genre-based approach to the teaching of report-writing. English for Specific Purposes, 10(1), 3-13.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(91)90012-L

Mort, P., & Drury, H. (2012). Supporting student academic literacy in the disciplines using genre-based online pedagogy. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 6(3), A1-A15.

Osman, H. (2004). Genre-based instruction for ESP [Electronic version]. Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi MARA. English Teacher, 13. Accessed March 20, 2006, from http://www.melta.org.my/ET/2004/2004-13.pdf

Talif, R., & Edwin, M. (1989). Error analysis of Form Four English compositions. The English Teacher Vol XVIII. Accessed October 5, 2012, from http://www.melta.org.my/ET/1989/main9.html

Ting, S. H., & Law, L. (2008, March 17-19). Genre-based approach to teaching English for Academic Purposes: Changes in undergraduates' academic writing. Proceedings of International Conference on Teaching and Learning (IMCICON), Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.

Ting, S. H., Raslie, H., & Jee, L. J. (2011). Case study on persuasiveness of argument texts written by proficient and less proficient Malaysian undergraduates. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 8, 71-92.

https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli.8.2011.7627

Ting, S. H., & Puteh, F. (2012). Academic discussion: From informal to formal writing in online forum. English for Specific Purposes (ESP Malaysia), 18, 31-40.

Ting, S. H., & Tee, P. F. (2008). TESL undergraduates' ability to handle academic text-types at Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. Asiatic Journal of Languages and Literatures, 2(2), 85-100.

Ting, S. H., & Tee, F. P. F. (2009, April). Organisational and grammatical features of explanations written by Biology undergraduates. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on English Language Learning Conference (ELT-CON 2009), Georgetown, Malaysia.

Unsworth, L. (1999). Developing critical understanding of the specialised language of school science and history texts: A functional grammatical perspective. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42(7), 508-521.

Zhu, W. (2004a). Writing in business courses: An analysis of assignment types, their characteristics, and required skills. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 111-35.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00046-7

Zhu, W. (2004b). Faculty views on the importance of writing, the nature of academic writing, and teaching and responding to writing in the disciplines. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 29-48.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.004

Published
2013-05-26
How to Cite
Ting, S. H. (2013). Genres apart: School and university writing. Issues in Language Studies, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.1677.2013