Working in groups for coursework assignments: The tertiary students’ perspective
Abstract
The study examined undergraduates’ perception of group work in doing coursework assignments. It specifically investigated students’ perceptions of the usefulness of group work in doing assignments; identified reasons which influence students’ preference or non-preference for group work in doing assignments; determined students’ expectations of instructor’s roles in group work; and compared students’ perceptions of group work across ethnic groups. A 39-item questionnaire was distributed to 200 students in a Malaysian public university. The findings showed that a majority of students viewed group work positively due to lesser time required to accomplish given tasks and increased interpersonal gains. Some students however disapproved of group work for several reasons including the difficulty to find mutually agreed time for discussions, domination of some group members, and the existence of slackers in the group. One major aspect highlighted in the study was students' need for continuous instructor support and assistance when group work was assigned.
References
Baines, E., Blatchford, P., & Chowne, A. (2007). Improving the effectiveness of collaborative group work in primary schools: Effects on science attainment. British Educational Research Journal, 33(5), 663-680.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701582231
Burdett, J., & Hastie, B. (2009). Predicting satisfaction with group work assignments. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 6(1), 61-71.
https://doi.org/10.53761/1.6.1.7
Chickering, W. A., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles in good practice in undergraduate education. Retrieved from http://www/lonestar.edu/multimedia/SevenPrinciples.pdf
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes team work: Group effectiveness research, from shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300303
Douglas, T. (2000). Basic groupwork (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge. Effandi Zakaria, Lu, C. C., & Md. Yusoff Daud. (2010). The effects of cooperative learning on students' mathematics achievement and attitude towards mathematics. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 272-275.
https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2010.272.275
Felder, R. M., & Rebecca, B. (2007). Cooperative learning. Retrieved from http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/CLChapter.pdf Hennessy, D., & Evans, R. (2006). Small-group learning in the community college classroom. Retrieved from http://www.schoolcraft.edu/pdfs/cce/12.1.93-110.pdf
Jacques, D. (1995). Learning in groups. London, UK: Kogan Page Limited.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson R. T. (1991). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). An overview of cooperative learning. Retrieved from http://www.cooperation.org/pages/overviewpaper.html
Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-Eric Higher Education Report No. 4. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.
Kaenzig, R., Hyatt, E., & Anderson, S. (2007). Gender differences in college of business educational experiences. Journal of Education for Business, 83(2), 95-100.
https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.83.2.95-100
Kennett, D. J., Stedwill, A. T., Berrill, D., & Young, A. M. (1996). Co-operative learning in a university setting: Evidence for the importance of learned resourcefulness. Studies in Higher Education, 21(2), 177-186.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079612331381348
Kromrey, J. D., & Purdom, D. M. (1995). A comparison of lecture, cooperative learning and programmed instruction at the college level. Studies in Higher Education, 20(3), 341-349.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079512331381605
Livingston, D., & Lynch, K. (2000). Group project work and student-centred active learning: Two different experiences. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 325-345.
https://doi.org/10.1080/713696161
Long, M. H., & Porter, P. A. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/journals /tesol.html
https://doi.org/10.2307/3586827
McManus, S. M., & Gettinger, M. (1997). Teacher and student evaluations of cooperative learning and observed interactive behaviors. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(1-6), 13-22.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1996.9944439
Panitz, T. (1996). A definition of collaborative vs. cooperative learning. Retrieved from http://www.city.londonmet.ac.uk/deliberation/collablearning/ index.html
Park, C. C. (2001). Learning style preferences of Armenian, African, Hispanic, Hmong, Korean, Mexican, and Anglo students in American secondary schools. Learning Environment Research, 4, 175-191.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012463316737
Payne, B. K., & Monk-Turner, E. M. (2006). Students' perceptions of group projects: The role of race, age, and slacking. College Student Journal, 40(1), 132-139.
Smith, A. (2006). Group work benefits pupils, study finds. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2006/mar/31/schools.uk2
Terenzini, P. T., Cabrera, A. F., Colbeck, C. L., Parente, J. M., & Bjorklund, S. A. (2001). Collaborative learning vs. lecture/discussion: Students' reported learning gains. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(1), 123-133.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00579.x
Tok, H. S. (2006). Cooperative learning and achievement in English language acquisition in a literature class in a secondary school. Retrieved from http://eprints.utm. my/6550/
Vaughan, W. (2002). Effects of cooperative learning on achievement and attitude among students of color. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 359-364.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596610
Watson, B. (1995). Relinquishing the lectern: Cooperative learning in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 46(3), 209-215.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
