Schema influence on listening and speaking input retention

  • Ernisa Marzuki Faculty of Language and Communication, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak

Abstract

Schema has been shown to influence reading and listening processes and retention of information. At the same time, it also arguably resists new information. This study aimed to find out the level of specific item recall in participants after they were given either a listening or reading input with specific altered items. It also examined the differences in the retention of participants who possessed schema of the narrative compared with those who did not possess the schema. For the specific item recall, results revealed that regardless of the type of input, the four major altered items were recalled the most. Meanwhile, the comparison between participants with schemata and without schemata showed that those with schema performed better, with participants who listened to the input and possessing schema achieving the best retention results. The results of this study highlighted the importance of narrative selection for input in teaching and learning whilst also providing evidence that cultural schema influences the type of items recalled from both types of input.

References

Baldwin, R. S., Peleg-Bruckner, Z., & McClintock, A. H. (1985). Effects of topic interest and prior knowledge on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(4), 497-504.

https://doi.org/10.2307/747856

Brewer, W. F., & Nakamura, G. V. (1984). The nature and functions of schemas. In S. W. Robert & K. S. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (pp. 119-160). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Carrell, P. L. (1983, March). Some issues in studying the role of schemata, or background knowledge, in second language acquisition. Paper presented at the TESOL Convention, Toronto, Canada.

Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 553-573.

https://doi.org/10.2307/3586613

Chiang, C. S., & Dunkel, P. (1992). The effect of speech modification, prior knowledge, and listening proficiency on EFL lecture learning. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 345-374.

https://doi.org/10.2307/3587009

Ellermeyer, D. (1993). Improving listening comprehension through a whole-schema approach. Early Child Development and Care, 93(1), 101-110.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0030443930930110

Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Long, D. R. (1989). Second language listening comprehension: A schema-theoretic perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 73(1), 32-40.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05307.x

Markham, P., & Latham, M. (1987). The influence of religion-specific background knowledge on the listening comprehension of adult second-language students. Language Learning, 37(2), 157-170.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1987.tb00563.x

Martin, J. S. (2009). Analysis on structural pattern of plotline and myths in Malaysian folktales. Unpublished undergraduate thesis. Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia.

McVee, M. B., Dunsmore, K., & Gavelek, J. R. (2005). Schema theory revisited. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 531-566.

https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075004531

Pritchard, R. (1990). The effects of cultural schemata on reading processes strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(4), 273-295.

https://doi.org/10.2307/747692

Reynolds, R. E., Taylor, M. A., Steffenson, M. S., Shirey, L. L., & Anderson, R. C. (1982). Cultural schemata and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(3), 353-366.

https://doi.org/10.2307/747524

Sadighi, F., & Zare, S. (2006). Is listening comprehension influenced by background knowledge of the learners? A case study of Iranian EFL learners. The Linguistics Journal, 1(3), 110-126.

Schmidt-Reinhart, B. C. (1994). The effects of topic familiarity on second language listening comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 179-189.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02030.x

Shapiro, A. M. (2004). How including prior knowledge as a subject variable may change outcomes of learning research. American Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 159-189.

https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041001159

Srull, T. K. (1983). The role of prior knowledge in the acquisition, retention, and use of new information. Advances in Consumer Research, 10, 572-576.

Tomaszewski, Z., & Binsted, K. (2007). The limitations of a Propp-based approach to interactive drama. In B. S. Magerko & M. A. Riedl (Eds.), Intelligent narrative technologies: Papers from AAAI Fall Symposium (pp. 166-172). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.

Vidal, K. (2011). A comparison of the effects of reading and listening on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 61(1), 219-258.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00593.x

Published
2013-05-26
How to Cite
Marzuki, E. (2013). Schema influence on listening and speaking input retention . Issues in Language Studies, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.1670.2013