Definition formation process of language learning strategy: Issues and development
Abstract
Orientation of language learning strategy (LLS) research which was not based on solid theory in the early stages, and differences in second and foreign language learning setting have led to the formation of LLS terminologies and definition that are inconsistent and divergent. This situation has resulted in conflicting views among researchers. Hence, this paper attempts to identify issues and developments that occur in the process of defining LLS. It begins by discussing issues that have surfaced in the definition of LLS in terms of determining whether it is conscious or unconscious in nature. Debates pertaining to LLS definition have also been muddled with issues concerning the nature of learning strategy either as an action, or a mental activity or both. Some changes in the pattern of definitions that scholars created have been identified. These include the change in focus from product to process and the change in terms of the definitions’ comprehensiveness, among others. The influence of cognitive and social cognitive theories in defining LLS has also been observed after more than ten years of study in this field. As a result, this paper affirms that the main frame for the definition of LLS involves two components which are elements and purpose.
References
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anderson, J. R. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implication. New York, Freeman.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social functions of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bialystok, E. (1978). A theoretical model of second language learning. Language Learning, 28, 69-83.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1978.tb00305.x
Bremner, S. (1999). Language learning strategies and language proficiency: Investigating the relationship in Hong Kong. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 55(4), 490-514.
https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.55.4.490
Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Chamot, A. U. (1987). The learning strategies of ESL students. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 71-83). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Cohen, A. D. (1999). Strategies in learning and using a second language. London, UK: Longman.
Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1990). Adult language learning styles and strategies in intensive training setting. Modern Language Journal, 74(3), 311-327.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1990.tb01069.x
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford
University Press.
Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (1983). Procedural knowledge as a component of foreign language learners' communicative competence. In H. Boete & W. Herrlitz (Eds.), Kommunicationim (Sprach) Unterricht (pp. 169-199). Utrecht, Netherlands: Rijksuniversiteik.
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410604651
Grainger, P. R. (1997). Language learning strategies for learners of Japanese:
Investigating ethnicity. Foreign Language Annals, 30(3), 378-385.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb02360.x
Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2
https://doi.org/10.2307/3587625
proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly,29(2), 261-297.
Grenfell, M., & Macaro, E. (2011). Claims and critiques. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies (pp. 9-28). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Griffiths, C. (2003). Language learning strategy use and proficiency: The relationship between patterns of reported language learning strategy (LLS) use by speakers of other languages (SOL) and proficiency with implications for the teaching/learning situation. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Gu, P. Y. (1996). Robin Hood in SLA: What has the learning strategy research taught us? Asian Journal of English Language Teaching,6, 1-29.
Kamarul Shukri Mat Teh & Mohamed Amin Embi. (2010). Strategi pembelajaran bahasa. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Leaver, B. L., Ehrman, M., & Shekhtman, B. (2005). Achieving success in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610431
Macaro, E. (2001). Learning strategies in foreign and second language classrooms. London, UK: Continuum.
MacIntyre, P. D. (1994). Toward a social psychological model of strategy use. Foreign Language Annals, 27(2), 185-195.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1994.tb01201.x
Mayer R. (1988). Learning strategies: An overview. In C. Weinstein, E. Goetz, & P. Alexander (Eds.), Language and study strategies: issues in assessment, instruction and evaluation (pp. 11-22). New York, NY: Academic Press.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-742460-6.50008-6
McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second language learning. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
Mohamed Amin Embi. (1996). Language learning strategies employed by secondary school students learning English as a foreign language in Malaysia. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.
Mohamed Amin Embi. (2000). Language learning strategies: A Malaysian context. Bangi, Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Naiman, N., Frohlich, M., Stern, H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Research in Education Series No 7. Toronto, Canada: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Massachusetts, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Nyikos, M. (1991). Prioritizing student learning: a guide for teachers. In L. Strasheim (Ed.), Focus on the foreign language learner: priorities and strategies (pp. 25-39). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook.
O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524490
O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Walker, C. (1987). Some applications of cognitive theory to second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 287-306.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100006690
O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Russo, R. P., & Kupper, L. (1985). Learning strategies applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 557-584.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3586278
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
Oxford, R. L., & Cohen, A. D. (1992). Language learning strategies: Crucial issues of concept and classification. Applied Language Learning, 3(1-2),1-35.
Park, G. P. (1997). Language learning strategies and English proficiency in Korean university students. Foreign Language Annals, 30(2), 211-221.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb02343.x
Purpura, J. M. (1997). An analysis of the relationships between test takers' cognitive and metacognitive strategy use and second language test performance. Language Learning, 47(2), 289-325.
https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.91997009
Purpura, J. M. (1999). Learner strategy use and performance on language tests: A structural equation modeling approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Reid, J. M. (1995). Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Reid, J. M. (1998). Understanding learning styles in the second language classroom. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Regents Prentice Hall.
Richard, J., & Platt, J. (1992). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Essex, UK: Longman.
Rigney, J. W. (1978). Learning strategies: A theoretical perspective. In H. F. O'Neil, Jr. (Ed.), Learning strategies (pp. 164-205). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Rubin, J. (1975). What the good language learner can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41-51.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3586011
Rubin, J. (1987). Learners strategies: theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.). Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 15-29). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Seliger, H. W. (1983). The language learner as linguist: of metaphors and realities. Applied Linguistics, 4(3), 179-191.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.3.179
Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language acquisition. New York: Edward Arnold.
Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learners? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31(3), 304-318.
https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.31.4.304
Stern, H. H. (1983). Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Tamada, Y. (1997). The review of studies related to language learning strategies. ERIC Document Reproduction Services. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED404857).
Tarone, E. (1981). Some thoughts on notion of communication strategy. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 285-295.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3586754
Tudor, I. (1996). Learner-centeredness as language education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315-327). New York: MacMillan.
Wenden, A. L., & Rubin, J. (Eds.). (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
