Advertising language: A pragmatic approach to cigarette advertisements in Indonesia
PDF

How to Cite

Qadafi, A. M. (2014). Advertising language: A pragmatic approach to cigarette advertisements in Indonesia . Issues in Language Studies, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.1663.2014

Abstract

In Indonesia, it has been a public knowledge that cigarette is dangerous to consume. However, the involvement of advertisement and its huge economic benefit has driven the government to freely let cigarette be widely promoted; nevertheless the image of the cigarette would not be shown on the screen as per agreement with advertisers. These series of complexities in the cigarette advertisements have attracted the authors to investigate the way cigarettes are promoted without explicitly exposing them. Using inferential pragmatic approach (Sperber & Wilson, 2002), this research reveals that the language of advertisements operate subtly at the level of cognition and comprehension to persuade smokers.

https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.1663.2014
PDF

References

Abe, H. (2010). Queer Japanese: Gender and sexual identities through linguistic practices. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230106161

Belch, G. E., & Belch, M. E. (2003). Advertising and promotion: An integrated marketing communications perspective (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Berger, A. A. (2011). Ads, fads, and consumer culture: Advertising's impact on American character and society. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Brierley, S. (1995). The advertising handbook. London and New York: Routledge.

Bruthiaux, P. (2000). In a nutshell: Persuasion in the spatially constrained language of advertising. Language and Communication, 20, 297-310.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(00)00003-3

Cambridge (Digital) Learner's Dictionary 3rd Edition (2008). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cappo, J. (2003). The future of advertisement. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Chang, C. (2013). Imagery fluency and narrative advertising effects, Journal of Advertising, 42(1), 54-68.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2012.749087

Conrad, S. (2002). Corpus linguistic approaches for discourse analysis, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 75-95.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190502000041

Cook, G. (1992). The discourse of advertising. London and New York: Routledge.

Crichton, J. (2010). The discourse of commercialization: A multi-perspectives analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230295230

Crook, J. (2003). On covert communication in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 36, 715-738.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00039-0

Devra, D. (2008). The safer cigarette. The Ecologist, 38, 2, 44.

DiRocco, D. N., & Shadell, W. G. (2007) Gender differences in adolescents' responses to themes of relaxation in cigarette advertising: Relationship to intentions to smoke. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 205-213

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.03.035

Dyer, G. (1982). Advertising as communication. London and New York: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203328132

Freeman, D., Brucks, M., Wallendorf, M., & Boland, W. (2009). Youths understanding of cigarette advertisements. Addictive Behaviors, 34, 36-42.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.08.007

Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London and New York: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203272305

Gardner, R., & Luchtenberg, S., (1999). Reference, image, text in German and Australian advertising posters. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1807-1821.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00117-4

Grice, P. 1975. Logic and conversation. Accessed February 25, 2014, from http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ls/studypacks/Grice-Logic.pdf

Goddard, A. (1998). The Language of advertising. London and New York: Routledge.

Indonesian Republic Government Rule (2003). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19.

Indonesian Republic Government Rule (2012). Peraturan Pemerintah Pasal 17 Nomor 109.

Kemp, E., Kennet-Hensel, P. A., & Kees, J. (2013). Pulling on the heartstring: Examining the effects of emotions and gender in persuasive appeals. Journal of Advertising, 42:1, 69-79.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2012.749084

Kostova, D. and Blecher, E. (2013). Does advertising matter?: Estimating the impact of cigarette advertising on smoking among youth in developing countries. Contemporary Economic Policy, 31, 3, 537-548.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2012.00323.x

Litosseliti, L. (Ed.) (2010). Research methods in Linguistics. London: Continuum

MaCrury, L. (2009). Advertising. London and New York: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203493199

Martinez-Camino, G., & Perez-Saiz, M., (2011). A Pragmatics theory on television advertising. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 453-473.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.12.011

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.

McFall, L. (2004). Advertising: A cultural economy. London: SAGE Publications.

Paek, H., Reid, Leonard N. R., Jeong, H. J., Choi, H. & Krugman, D. (2012). Five decades of promotion techniques in cigarette advertising: A longitudinal content analysis. Health Marketing Quarterly, 29, 1-17.

https://doi.org/10.1080/07359683.2011.623087

Rodgers, S., & Thorson, E. (2012). Advertising theory. London/New York: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203149546

Silverman, D. (1994). Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1996). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Blackwell.

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2002). Relevance theory. Accessed February 20, 2014, from http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/publications/WPL/02papers/wilson_sperber.pdf

Tanaka, K. (1994). Advertising language: A pragmatic approach to advertisements in Britain and Japan. London and New York: Routledge.

Tungate, M. (2007). Adland: A global history of advertising. London and Philadelphia: Kogan Page.

Velasco-Sacristan, M., & Fuertes-Olivera, A. (2006). Towards a critical cognitive-pragmatic approach to gender metaphors in advertising English. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 11, 1982-2002.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.07.002

Vizcaino, M. J. G. (2011). Code-breaking/code-making: A new language approach in advertising. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(8), 2095-2109.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.014

Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal

1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.

2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.

3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.

4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.

5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.

6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.