Factors influencing Malaysian ESL learners’ engagement in academic writing (in L2)
Abstract
This paper examines Malaysian learners’ engagement in academic writing (AW) in a second language (L2) in a higher learning institution. A quantitative means of exploring students’ engagement was incorporated as a starting point to capture a broad cross-sectional snapshot of Malaysian learners’ engagement in academic writing and identify pertinent issues of the target population. The quantitative analysis revealed that the majority of the students were highly engaged and that they responded differently in the engagement domains (e.g., high behavioural engagement and low cognitive engagement). The subsequent exploration in the qualitative phase affirmed that the socio-historical aspects of the Malaysian context (e.g., position of English, identity conflicts, and emphasis on education) were also pertinent factors influencing student engagement in the AW class. While a psychological perspective has helped elucidate how engagement dimensions interacted in the learning process, the broader sociocultural aspects helped provide further insights into the role of contextual influences on student engagement in the AW class, and how these were driven by, and also drive motivation towards academic literacy and legitimacy.
References
Ali, Z., & Yunus, M. (2004). An ESL writing course: Unravelling students' needs and concerns. http://www.melta.org.my/ET/2004/2004-114.pdf
Anstrom, K., DiCerbo, P., Butler, F., Katz, A., Millet, J., & Rivera, C. (2010). A review of the literature on academic English: Implications for K-12 English language learners. http://www.ceee.gwu.edu
Astin, A. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bandura, A. (2008). Toward an agentic theory of the self. Self-processes, learning, and enabling human potential (Vol. 3, pp. 15-49 ). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2010). Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 2-20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson International Edition.
Boylan, M. (2010). Ecologies of participation in school classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 61-70.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.08.005
Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Teaching and Education International, 44(4), 349-362.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701602748
Canagarajah, S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Che Musa, N., Koo, Y. L., & Azman, H. (2012). Exploring English language learning and teaching in Malaysia. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 35-51.
Chen, X. (2010). Identity construction and negotiation within and across school communities: the case of one English-as-a-new-language (ENL) student. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 9(3), 163 - 179.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2010.486274
Chong, W. H. (2007). The role of personal agency beliefs in academic self-regulation: An Asian perspective. School Psychology International, 28(1), 63-76.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034307075681
Coates, H. (2010). Development of the Australasian survey of student engagement (AUSSE). Higher Education, 60, 1-17.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9281-2
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research design. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods on social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Darr, C., Ferral, H., & Stephanou, A. (2008, January). The development of a scale to measure student engagement. Paper presented at the 3rd International Rasch Measurement Conference, Perth, Australia.
Deil-Amen, R. (2011). Socio-academic integrative moments: Rethinking academic and social integration among two-year college students in career-related programs. Journal of Higher Education, 82(1), 54-91.
https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2011.0006
Drew, C., Hardman, M., & Hosp, J. (2008). Designing and conducting research in education. Los Angeles, California: Sage.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385648
Finn, J. D., & Cox, D. (1992). Participation and withdrawal among fourth-grade pupils. American Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 141-162.
https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312029001141
Finn, J. D., & Voelkl, K. E. (1993). School characteristics related to student engagement. The Journal of Negro Education, 62(3), 249-268.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2295464
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Furlong, M. J., & Christenson, S. L. (2008). Engaging students at school and with learning: A relevant construct for all students. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 365-368.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20302
Furlong, M. J., Whipple, A. D., St. Jean, G., Simental, J., Soliz, A., & Punthuna, S. (2003). Multiple contexts of school engagement: Moving toward a unifying framework for educational research and practice. The California School Psychologist, 8, 99-114.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340899
Gillaerts, P., & Van de Velde, F. (2010). Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 128-139.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.004
Glanville, J. L., & Wildhagen, T. (2007). The measurement of school engagement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(6), 1019-1041.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164406299126
Harklau, L. (2006). From the "Good kids" to the "Worst": Representations of English language learner across educational settings. In P. K. Matsuda, M. Cox, J. Jordan & C. Ortmeier-Hooper (Eds.), Second-language writing in the composition classroom (pp. 103-130). Boston: St. Martins.
Harris, L. (2010). Delivering, modifying or collaborating? Examining three teacher conceptions of how to facilitate student engagement. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 16(1), 131 - 151.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600903478037
Heirdsfield, A. M., Walker, S., & Walsh, K. M. (2008). Enhancing the first year experience - Longitudinal perspectives on a peer mentoring scheme. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/12150/
Hirano, E. (2008). Learning difficulty and learner identity: A symbiotic relationship. ELT Journal, 63(1), 33-41.
https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn021
Hirano, E. (2014). Refugees in first-year college: Academic writing challenges and resources. Journal of Second Language Writing, 23(0), 37-52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.01.001
Hockings, C., Cooke, S., Yamashita, H., McGinty, S., & Bowl, M. (2008). Switched off? A study of disengagement among computing students at two universities. Research Papers in Education, 23(2), 191-201.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520802048729
Hu, S., & Kuh, G. (2002). Being (dis)engaged in educationally purposeful activities: The influences of student and institutional characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 43(5), 555-575.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020114231387
Huhtala, A., & Lehti-Eklund, H. (2010). Writing a new self in the third place: Language students and identity formation. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 18(3), 273 -288.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2010.504647
Ivanic, R. (2006). Language, learning and identification. In R. Kiely, P. Rea-Dickins, H. Woodfield & G. Clibbon (Eds.), Language, culture and identity in applied linguistics (pp. 7-29). London: Equinox.
James, R., McInnis, C., & Devlin, M. (2002). Assessing learning in Australian universities. http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/assessinglearning/docs/AssessuingLearning.pdf
Janesick, V. (2000). The choreography of qualitative research design. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 379-399). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Jary, D., & Lebeau, Y. (2009). The student experience and subject engagement in UK sociology: A proposed typology. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(6), 697 - 712.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690903235219
Kahu, E. R. (2011). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758-773.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
Kift, S. M., & Moody, K. E. (2009). Harnessing assessment and feedback in the first year to support learning success, engagement and retention. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/28849/1/28849.pdf
Kift, S. M., Nelson, K. J., & Clarke, J. (2010). Transition pedagogy: A third generation approach to FYE - A case study of policy and practice for the higher education sector. International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 1(1), 1-20.
https://doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v1i1.13
Kiley, M. (2003). Conserver, strategist or transformer: the experiences of postgraduate student sojourners. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(3), 345-356.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510309401
Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., & Ramayah, T. (2007). Cross-cultural differences in the academic motivation of university students in Malaysia and the United States. North American Journal of Psychology, 9(2), 275-292.
Kuh, G. (2003). What we're learning about student engagement from NNSE. Change, 35(2), 24.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380309604090
Kuh, G. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683-706.
https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0099
Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J., Bridges, B., & Hayek, J. (2007). Piecing together the student success puzzle: Research, propositions, and recommendations. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Leach, L. (2014). Enhancing student engagement in one institution. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1-25.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2013.869565
Leki, I. (2011). Learning to write in a second language: Multilingual graduates and undergraduates expanding genre repertoires In R. Manchón (Ed.), Learningto-write and Writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 85-110). Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.31.09lek
Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T. (2008). A synthesis of research on second language writing in English. New York: Routledge.
Li, X. (2007). Souls in exile: Identities of bilingual writers. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 6(4), 259-275.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15348450701542256
MacDonald, S. P. (1987). Problem definition in academic writing. College English, 49(3), 315-331.
https://doi.org/10.2307/377930
MacLean, L., Mechthild, M., & Alma, E. (2004). Improving accuracy of transcripts in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 14(1), 113-123.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303259804
Matsuda, P. K., & Tardy, C. (2007). Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 235-249.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.001
McInnis, C. (2001). Signs of disengagement? The changing undergraduate experience in Australian universities. Inaugural professorial lecture. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 466720). http://eric.ed.gov
Morita, N. (2009). Language, culture, gender, and academic socialization. Language and Education, 23(5), 443-460.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780902752081
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2011). Fostering student engagement campuswide: Annual Results 2011. http://nsse.iub.edu/NSSE_2011_Results/pdf/NSSE_2011_AnnualResults.pdf#page=17
Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. M. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11-39). New York: Teachers College Press.
Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. Harlow, England: Longman/ Pearson.
Norton, B. (2010). Language and identity. In N. Hornberger & S. McKay (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 349-369). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692849-015
Oliver, D. G., Serovich, J., M., & Mason, T. L. (2005). Constraints and opportunities with interview transcription: Towards reflection in qualitative research. Social Forces, 84 (2), 1273-1289.
https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0023
Othman, S. B., & Mohamad, F. ( 2009, November). Students' response to teacher feedback on multiple-draft compositions in ESL classroom. Paper presented at the International Conference of Teaching and Learning (ICTL), INTI University College, Malaysia. Retrieved from http:///ictl.initimal.edu.my/ictl2009/proceeding/Parallel%202Sessions%202/2C/2C-03-P64%20(Malaysia).doc.
Pace, C. (1980). Measuring the quality of student effort. Current Issues in Higher Education, 2(10-16).
Pace, C., & Kuh, G. (1998). College student experiences questionnaires (4th ed.). Indiana: Indiana University.
Pascarella, E. (1991). The impact of college on students: The nature of the evidence. The Review of Higher Education, 14(1), 453-466.
https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1991.0008
Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (2005). How college affect students: A third decade of research. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
Petrides, K. V., & Frederickson, N. (2011). An application of belief-importance theory in the domain of academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 97-111.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02010.x
Ransdell, S., & Barbier, M. (2002). New directions for research in L2 writing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Acadmic Publishers.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0363-6
Ratner, C. (2002). Cultural psychology: Theory and method. New York: Plenum.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0677-5
Santos, T. (1988). Professors' reactions to the academic writing of nonnativespeaking students. TESOL Quarterly, 22(1), 69-90.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3587062
Sheldon, E. (2009). From one I to another: Discursive construction of selfrepresentation in English and Castilian Spanish research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 28(4), 251-265.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.05.001
Stacey, J. (2010). Writer identity while learning discipline-specific academic literacy in an additional language. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 27(3), 345 - 356.
https://doi.org/10.2989/SALALS.2009.27.3.11.945
Steinman, L. (2003). Cultural collisions in L2 academic writing. TESL Canada Journal, 20(2), 80-91.
https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v20i2.950
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory-procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Tan, Y. S. (2012). Democratization of secondary education in Malaysia: Emerging problems and challenges of educational reform. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(1), 53-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.11.004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.11.004
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922461.001.0001
Tinto, V. (2010). From theory to action: Exploring the institutional conditions for student retention In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 51-89). Netherlands: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8598-6_2
Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/ourwork/studentengagement/StudentEngagementLiteratureReview.pdf
Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12-23.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002
Warriner, D. S. (2010). Competent performances of situated identities: Adult learners of English accessing engaged participation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(1), 22-30. doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.003
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.003
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identitiy. Cambridge: Cambdrige University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students' achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1), 1-35.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001
Wilson, S. (2010). Student engagement: Student expectations, institutional performance and teacher priorities-An institutional case study http://www.tlri.org.nz/assets/A_Project-PDFs/9261-Zepke/9261-Case-Study9-.pdf
Yah Awg, N., Hamzah, A., & Hasbollah, R. (2010, September). Why writing in ESL is difficult for undergraduates in a public university in Malaysia. Paper presented at the Educational and Information Technology (ICEIT), Chongqing, China. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5607514&tag=1
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEIT.2010.5607514
Zhu, W. (2004). Faculty views on the importance of writing, the nature of academic writing, and teaching and responding to writing in the disciplines. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 29-48.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.004
Zimmerman, B. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 21, 3-17.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
