English Remedial Instruction to Enhance Low-Achieving Students’ Vocabulary

Authors

  • Jia-Yiing Ho

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.1629.2016

Abstract

This study examines the extent to which using an English Remedial Instruction Course enhances the vocabulary of Form 3 Malaysian students at a rural school in Sarawak, Malaysia. The research questions addressed were: (1) What are the teachers’ beliefs, assumptions and knowledge (BAK) in regards to teaching remedial students?; (2) Is there a significant difference in vocabulary competency between pre- and post-test mean score for those who underwent the English remedial instruction course in an ESL classroom and the control group?; and (3) What are the students’ feedback regarding the use of remedial instruction in their ESL classroom? The vocabulary chosen for the study was taken from the Ministry of Education Malaysia Form 3 English Textbook Word List, mostly consisting of the common words used in the students’ daily lives. An 8-week remedial instruction course which employed a variety of teaching theory-based activities was designed as the intervention process for the study. Thirty students (experimental group) were chosen from an English language Form 3 low-achieving class to undergo the course while another 30 students (controlled group) underwent the traditional chalk-and-talk and memorisation learning method. Pre-test and post-test statistical results of the students showed there were significant differences using Remedial Instruction enhance the learners’ vocabulary. Learners’ perceptions regarding the English Remedial Instruction course yielded positive responses as gathered through the feedback survey. Educational policy makers could thus improvise workshops and seminars based on these data-proven remedial instruction activities.

References

Allen, V.R. (1970) Updating the Language Experience Approach. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED040831.pdf

Asher, J. J. (1969). The Total Physical Response Approach to second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 53(1), 3-17.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1969.tb04552.x

Aslanabadi, H., & Rasouli, G. (2013). The effect of games on improvement of Iranian EFL vocabulary knowledge in kindergartens. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(1), 186-195.

Bowen, T. (2013). Teaching approaches: Total physical response. Retrieved from http://www.onestopenglish.com

Butler, Y. G. (2011). The implementation of communicative and task-based language teaching in the Asia-Pacific region. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 36-57.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000122

Ellis, R. (2004). The methodology of task-based teaching. Educational Foreign Language Research, 79.

Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.

Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

Ibrahim, N. A., & Mat Saman, N. (2010). A study of the cognitive reading strategies employed by ESL readers. Unpublished article, Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Leake, M., & Lesik, S. A. (2007). Do remedial English programs impact first-year success in college? An illustration of the regression‐discontinuity design. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 30(1), 89-99.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270701207827

McKay, S.L. (2009). Teaching English as an international language: rethinking goals and approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ministry of Education (2012). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025 (Preliminary Report). Retrieved from Ministry of Education website: http://www.moe.gov.my/userfiles/file/PPP/Preliminary-Blueprint-Eng.pdf

Rozana, S. (2015). Room for improvement. Retrieved from http://www.nst.com.my/news/2015/12/116794/room-improvement

Richards, W. (2015). Remedial Instruction Program. Georgia's School Superintendent.

Saville-Troike, M. (2012). Introducing second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511888830

Smith, L. (1995). English in Education. English in Education, 29(2), 1-57.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-8845.1995.tb01142.x

Taylor, M. (1992). The Language Experience Approach and adult learners. Center for Applied Linguistics. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/caela/esl_resources/digests/LEA.html

Thornbury, S. (2004). How to teach vocabulary. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

Tomlinson, B. (2006). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Van Uden, J. M., Ritzen, H., & Pieters, J. M. (2013). I think I can engage my students. Teachers' perceptions of student engagement and their beliefs about being a teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 32, 43-54.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.01.004

Downloads

Published

2016-06-27

How to Cite

Ho, J.-Y. (2016). English Remedial Instruction to Enhance Low-Achieving Students’ Vocabulary. Issues in Language Studies, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.1629.2016