Investigating the Implementation of Blended Learning in a Paragraph Writing Course in Promoting Student Engagement: The Case of Introductory Writing Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.1613.2018Abstract
Blended learning, the instructional approach integrating online learning into face-to-face learning, is one of the approaches gaining widespread acceptance among educational practitioners. One of its advantages is to promote student engagement, which is viewed beneficial to ensure deep learning among students and address some educational issues. Although there is no specific formula for engaging all students into a course, blended learning is believed to enable student engagement further away than what is possible in a face-to-face instruction. This paper reports a case study conducted at a university in Indonesia. The purpose of the study was to investigate the implementation of blended learning in a paragraph writing course to promote student engagement. Data were collected through observations, interviews, and document analysis, and analysed using Miles, Huberman and Saldana’s (2014) interactive model. It was revealed that the instructional strategies in the course focused on the benefits of face-to-face learning as the main instructional method while the online learning was the supplementary to reinforce students’ knowledge and understanding. The implementation of blended learning in the course was able to promote student engagement particularly through the activities of uploading course materials, online writing assignments, online quizzes, student-teacher conferencing, class discussion, and group work.
References
Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: a developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518-529.
Auster, C. J. (2016). Blended learning as a potentially winning combination of faceto-face and online learning: an exploratory study. Teaching Sociology, 44(1), 39-48.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X15619217
Berger, R. (2003). An ethic of excellence: building a culture of craftsmanship with students. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Bersin, J. (2004). The blended learning book: best practices, proven methodologies, and lessons learned. San Francisco, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Briggs, S. (2014). 21 ways to check for student understanding. Retrieved from https://www.opencolleges.edu.au/informed/features/21-ways-to-check-forstudent-understanding/
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Catapano, J. (n.d.). Schoology: a learning management system overview. Retrieved from http://www.teachhub.com/schoology-learning-management-systemoverview
Challob, A. I., Bakar, N. A., & Latif, H. (2016). Collaborative blended learning writing environment: effects on EFL students' writing apprehension and writing performance. Canadian Center of Science and Education. 9(6), 229-241.
https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n6p229
Downing, C. E., Spears, J., & Holtz, M. (2014). Transforming a course to blended learning for student engagement. Educational Research International, 2014, 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/430732
Epignosis LLC (2014). E-learning: concepts, trends, applications. Retrieved from https://www.talentlms.com/elearning/elearning-101-jan2014-v1.1.pdf.
Ebner, H. K. (2016). Work conferences and student engagement. Masters of Arts in Education Action Research Papers. Paper 153.
Fenton, W. (2018). The best (LMS) learning management systems for 2018. Retrieved from http://sea.pcmag.com/absorb-lms/10984/guide/the-bestlms-learning-management-systems-for-2018.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education. San Francisco: USA: JohnWiley & Sons, Inc.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118269558
Harrison, H., Birks, M., Franklin, R., & Mills, J. (2017). Case study research: foundations and methodological orientations. forum qualitative sozialforschung / forum: qualitative social research, 18(1). Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1701195.
Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching academic ESL writing: practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609427
Howard, S. K. (2013). Risk-aversion: understanding teachers' resistance to technology integration. Technology, Pedagogy and Education.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.802995
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667251
Ma'arop, A. H. & Embi, M. A. (2016). Implementation of blended learning in higher learning institutions: A Review of the Literature. International Education Studies, 9(3), 41-52.
https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n3p41
Martin, J. & Torres, A. (2016). User's guide and toolkit for the surveys of student engagement: the high school survey of student engagement (HSSSE) and the middle grades survey of student engagement (MGSSE). Retrieved from https://www.nais.org/Articles/Documents/Member/2016%20HSSSE%20Chapter-1.pdf
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). California, USA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Nunan, D. (1989). Second language teaching &learning. Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Purnawarman, S., Susilawati, & Sundayana, W. (2016). The use of edmodo in teaching writing in a blended learning setting. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 242-252.
https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i2.1348
Shernoff, D. J. (2013). Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement. New York, NY: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7089-2
Spencer, J. (2015). The power of student conferencing. Retrieved from http://www.spencerauthor.com/the-power-of-student-conferencing/
Stein, J. & Graham, C. R. (2014). Essentials for blended learning: a standards-based guide. Third Avenue, New York: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203075258
Thorne, K. (2003). Blended learning: how to integrate online and traditional learning. London, UK: Kogan Page Limited.
Wankel, C. & Blessinger, P. (2013). Increasing student engagement and retention in e-learning environments: web 2.0 and blended learning technologies. Howard House, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
https://doi.org/10.1108/S2044-9968(2013)6_Part_G
Zhang, Z. & McNamara, O. (2018). Undergraduate Student Engagement. Singapore: Springer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
