Interpreting the Human Being Metaphors in Ekegusii Pop Songs Using the Cognitive Semantics Framework
Abstract
The paper explores the human being metaphors in Ekegusii pop songs (EPS). Composers of EPS use human being metaphors to convey their message in different perspectives. It is possible for the meaning of the human being metaphors to elude the audience of EPS because language is both embodied and situated in a specific environment. Therefore, the meaning of the metaphors need to be objectively interpreted to reveal the message of the composers. The study purposively sampled Christopher Mosioma’s (Embarambamba) EPS amasomo (education) and the late Ontiri Bikundo’s obwanchani (love) based on the songs’ richness in metaphors. The Metaphor Identification Procedure Vrije Universiteit was used to identify 54 metaphors in the EPS by four coders (including the researchers). The concept of conceptual mapping, which is a fundamental tenet of the Conceptual Metaphor Theory, was employed to understand the source domains in terms of the target domains. The identified metaphors were classified into four conceptual domains of human being, animal, plant and object using the principle of the Great Chain of Being Metaphor. The paper then identified eight human being metaphors for the present study. The research found that human being metaphors are important ways of conceptualizing other human beings in society. In addition, metaphors are important tools of communication and should be explained using a cognitive semantics framework. The findings of the study will benefit the audience of the EPS, ethnographers and metaphor theorists to conceptualise EPS and culture.
References
Ahrens, K. (2002). When love is not digested: Underlying reasons for source to target domain pairings in the contemporary theory of metaphor. Proceedings of the First Cognitive Linguistic Conference (pp. 273-302). Cheng-Chi University, China.
Aksan, M. (2006). The container metaphor in Turkish expressions of anger. Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi / Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 3(2), 1-20.
Aunga, S. (2011). The nature of homonymous and polysemous relations in EkeGusii (Unpublished MA thesis). Kenyatta University, Kenya.
Ayduk, O., & Mischel, W. (2002). When smart people behave stupidly: Reconciling inconsistencies in social-emotional intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Why smart people can be so stupid (pp. 86-105). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Barcelona, A. (1995). Metaphorical models of romantic love in Romeo and Juliet. Journal of Pragmatics, 24, 667-688.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00007-F
Barcelona, A., & Valenzuela, J. (2005). An overview of cognitive linguistics. In I. Brady, M. Coy & C. Pascual (Eds.), Nuavas tendencias en linguistic (pp. 197-230). Murcia: Quaderna Editorial.
Brudevold, M. S. (2015). The wisdom in folly: An examination of William Shakespeare's fools in Twelfth Night and King Lear (Unpublished bachelor's thesis). Scripps College, USA.
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.
Cameron, L., & Low, G. (1999). Metaphor. Language Teaching, 32, 77-96.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800013781
Cammenga, J. (2002). The phonology and morphology of Ekegusii- A Bantu language of Kenya. Koln: Rudiger Koppe Verlag.
Corrigan, P. W., & Penn, D. L. (1999). Lessons from social psychology on discrediting psychiatric stigma. American Psychologist, 54, 765-776.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.765
Evans, V. (2007). Towards a cognitive compositional semantics. In U. Magnusson, H. Kardela & A. Glaz (Eds.), Further insights in semantics and lexicography (pp.11-42). Poland: Marie Curie University Press.
Foss, D. (2012). The British Monarchy: Symbolism and salience in times of crisis (Unpublished Honors thesis). University of Colorado, USA.
Gardenfors, P. (2003). Conceptual spaces: The geometry of thoughts. Cambridge: MIT Press
Gathigia, M. G. (2014). Metaphors of love in Gikuyu: Conceptual mappings, vital relations and image schemas (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Kenyatta University, Kenya.
Gathigia, M. G. (2016). Metaphorical analysis of Murimi Wa Kahalf's pop song: INO NI MOMO. Proceedings of the Second International Research Conference (pp. 499-505). Chuka University, Kenya.
Gibbs, R. W. (2011). Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 529 - 562.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2011.606103
Goatly, A. (1997). The language of metaphors. London: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203210000
Grusky, D., & Kanbur, R. (2006). Introduction: The conceptual foundations of poverty and inequality measurement. In D. Grusky & R. Kanbur (Eds.), Poverty and inequality. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Guthrie, M. (1971). Comparative Bantu: An introduction to the comparative linguistics pre-history of Bantu languages. Farnborough: Gregg Press.
Jones, B. (2015). Social and environmental impacts of charcoal production in Liberia (Unpublished MA thesis). The University of Michigan, USA.
Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (2010). 2009 Kenya population and housing census: Population distribution by age, sex and administrative units. Nairobi: Government Press.
Korankye, A. A. (2014). Causes of poverty in Africa: A review of Literature. American International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(7), 147-153.
Kothari, C. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd ed.). New Delhi: New Age International Publishers.
Kövecses, Z. (2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction: New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Krickmann, A. (1998). On the relationship of the rhetorical, modal, logical and syntactic planes in Estonian proverbs. An Electronic Journal of Folklore, 8, 51-99.
https://doi.org/10.7592/FEJF1998.08.syntmod2
Krisnawati, E. (2014). Metaphors in Indonesian soccer news. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(1), 24 -29.
https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.1.24-29
Krzeszowski, T. P. (1997). Angels and devils in hell: Elements of axiology in semantics. Warszawa: Wydawnic two Energeia.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chocago Press.
Lakoff G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
Laura, A. J. (2004). A metaphor is in search of a source domain. The categories of Slavic aspect. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 171-527.
https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.15.4.471
Lipton, M., & Ravallion, M. (1993). Poverty and policy: Working paper series. Washington D. C: The World Bank.
López, I. (2009). Of women, bitches, chickens and vixens: animal metaphors for women in English and Spanish. Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación/Culture, Language and Representation, 7(7), 77-100.
Machakanja, I. (2006). Conceptual metaphor in English and Shona: A cross-linguistic and cross-cultural study (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of South Africa, South Africa.
Maho, T. F. (2008). The Bantu bibliography: African linguistic bibliography. Koln: Rudiger Koppe Verlag.
Nishina, Y. (2017). A study of pop songs based on the billboard corpus. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 4(2), 125-134.
Nyakoe, G. N., Ongarora, D. O., & Oloo, P. (2014). An analysis of the food metaphor in EkeGusii HIV and AIDS discourse. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(1), 221 -228.
https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v4-i8/1100
Nyakundi, A. O. (2010). The translation of figurative language in the book of Proverbs in EkeGusii Bible (Unpublished MA thesis). Kenyatta University, Kenya.
Obwoge, C. (2014). A lexico-semantic analysis of EkeGusii circumcision social varieties (Unpublished MA thesis). University of South Africa, South Africa.
Pine, L. G. (1992). How the king became his majesty. New York: Oxford University Press.
Saaed, J. (1997). Semantics. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business students (2nd ed.). Great Britain: Pearson Education Ltd.
Scruton, R. (2005). Philosophy: Principles and problems. London: The University of Chicago Press.
Steen, G. J. (2007). Finding metaphor and usage. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company.
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.10
Steen, G., Dorst, A., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14
Sullivan, S. (2013). Pop music. Encyclopedia of Great Popular Song Recording, 2, 101-103.
Taack, L. J. (2018). Redefining the roles of the teacher: It's multifaceted profession. Edutopia: George Lucas Educational Foundation.
Tagg, P. (2015). Analysing popular music. New York: Mass Media Music Scholars Press.
Tolle, E. (2005). A new Earth: Awakening to your life's purpose. New York: Penguin Rondon House.
Underwood, G. (2009). Compassionate love: A framework for research. In B. Fehr, S. Sprecher & L. Underwood (Eds.), The science of compassionate love: Theory, research and applications (pp. 3-25). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Woodin, L. S. (2006). Social relationships and disabled people (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Leeds, UK.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
