ESL Learners’ Language Errors in a Reflective Writing Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.1291.2019Abstract
Perceived as one fundamental element in language learning, grammar is reckoned important in ESL writing. ESL learners need to master the knowledge of how to transfer grammatical concepts into their ESL composition. However, Malaysian learners of English often repeat errors in writing which they cannot even recognize. The current study draws attention to the occurrences of language errors and examines their sources in Malaysian ESL learners’ writing. 40 students in their Semester 2 of diploma level were selected to participate in the study. Each student was to produce two essays of 100-word length. Each essay was first examined before language errors were identified and coded based on the parts of speech: Nouns, Verbs, Adjectives, Adverbs, Articles, Pronouns, Prepositions, Adverbs, Conjunctions and Determiners. For each type of errors, the sources were categorized based on interlingual and intralingual sources. 258 errors were identified with the most frequent language errors produced were verb errors while the least were determiner errors. The result revealed that the most dominant errors were caused by intralingual sources. This study would greatly help teachers to establish better curriculum and select materials to facilitate students in learning English and develop them as proficient learners who can self-correct language errors.
References
Abushihab, I. (2014). An analysis of grammatical errors in writing made by Turkish learners of English as a foreign language. International Journal of Linguistics, 6(4), 213-223.
https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v6i4.6190
Alhaisoni, M. (2012). An analysis of article errors among Saudi female EFL students: A case study. Asian Social Science- Canadian Center of Science and Education, 8(12), 55-66.
https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n12p55
Al-Sawalha, A., & Chow, T. (2012). The effects of proficiency on the writing process of Jordanian EFL university students. Academic Research International, 3(2), 379-388.
Ansaldo, U. (2010). Contact and Asian Varieties of English. In R. Hickey (Ed.), The handbook of language contact (pp. 498-517). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318159.ch24
Beason, L. (2001). Ethos and error: How business people react to errors. College Composition and Communication, 53(1), 33-64.
https://doi.org/10.2307/359061
Brown, H. D. (1994). Teaching by principles: Interactive language teaching methodology. New York: Prentice Hall Regents.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4 ed.). Boston, MA: Longman.
Chan, S. H., & Abdullah, A. N. (2004). Exploring affect in ESL writing behaviour. The English Teacher, 12.
Corder, S. P. (1967). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learner's errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5(4), 161-170.
https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161
Corder, S. P. (1974). Error analysis. In J. Allen & S. Corder (Eds.): The Edinburgh course in applied linguistics Volume 3: Techniques in applied linguistics (pp. 122-154). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
David, A. R., Azman, H., & Tan, S. M. (2018). Investigating online dialogue journal writing impacts on low proficiency students' writing anxiety. International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 71-81.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Ghabool, N., Maridass, M. A., & Kashef, S. H. (2012). Investigating Malaysian ESL students' writing problems on conventions, punctuation, and language use at secondary school level. Journal of Studies in Education, 2(3), 130-143.
https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v2i3.1892
Gustilo, L., & Magno, C. (2015). Explaining L2 writing performance through a chain of predictors: A SEM approach. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 21(2), 115-130.
https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2015-2102-09
Heydari, P. & Bagheri, M. S. (2012). Error analysis: Sources of l2 learners' errors. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(8), 1583-1589.
https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.8.1583-1589
Huang, S. J. (2006). A case study of EFL students' writing errors on a web-based writing program. Paper presented at the International Conference & Workshop on TEFL and Applied Linguistics, Ming Chuan University.
Ismail, N., Elias, S., Albakri, I. S. M. A., Perumal, P. D., & Muthusamy, I. (2010). Exploring ESL students' apprehension level and attitude towards academic writing. International Journal of Learning, 17(6).
https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v17i06/45609
Javed, M., Juan, W. X., & Nazli, S. (2013). A study of students' assessment in writing skills of the English language. International Journal of Instruction, 6(2), 129-144.
Jin, S. H. Implementation of Smartphone-Based Blended Learning in an EFL Undergraduate Grammar Course. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 17(4), 11-37.
https://doi.org/10.15702/mall.2014.17.4.11
Karim, N. S., Onn., F. M., Musa, H., & Mahmood, A. H. (2009). Tatabahasa Dewan. (Edisi Ketiga). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Kaweera, C. (2013). Writing Error: A Review of Interlingual and Intralingual Interference in EFL Context. English language teaching, 6(7), 9-18.
https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n7p9
Kim, S. (2001). An error analysis of college students' writing: Is that really Konglish?. Studies in Modern Grammar, 25, 159- 174.
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across Cultures: Applied Linguistics for Language Teachers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Celce-Murcia, M. (1999). The grammar book. Boston, MA Heinle and Heinle.
Li, Z., & Hegelheimer, V. (2013). Mobile-assisted grammar exercises: Effects on self-editing in L2 writing. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 135-156.
Maniam, M., & Rajagopal, P. (2016). Simple past tense errors based on surface structure taxonomy in ESL Malaysian undergraduates writing. Global Journal of Advanced Research, 3(6), 547-553.
Marlyna, Maros., Tan, K. H., & Khazriyati, S. (2007). Interference in learning English: Grammatical errors in English essay writing among rural Malay secondary school students in Malaysia. Jurnal e-Bangi, 2(2), 1-15.
Mohideen, H. (1996). Error analysis - Contributory factors to students' errors, with special reference to errors in written English. The English Teacher Volume XXV.
Nayan, S., & Jusoff, K. (2009). A study of subject-verb agreement: From novice writers to expert writers. International Education Studies, 2(3), 190-194.
https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v2n3p190
Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. USA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Pae, T. (2018). Effects of task type and L2 proficiency on the relationship between L1 and L2 in reading and writing: An SEM Approach. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(1), 63-90.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000462
Phuket, P. R. N., & Othman, N. B. (2015). Understanding EFL students' errors in writing. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(32), 99-106.
Ponmani, M., & Mekala, S. (2016). An analysis of concord errors in ESL learners' writing. The Global Journal of English Studies, 2(1), 1-8.
Putri, P. S., & Dewanti, A. (2014). An analysis of grammatical errors in writing narrative texts done by the second semester students at the diploma program English Department in Airlangga University Surabaya. Anglicist, 3(1), 1-7.
Ringbom, H. (1987). The role of first language in foreign language learning. USA: Multilingual Matters, Ltd.
Richards, J. C. (1971). A non-contrastive approach to error analysis. English Language Teaching Journal, 25, 204-219.
https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/XXV.3.204
Richards, J. C. (1974). Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition. London: Longman.
Sattayatham, A., & Honsa, S. (2007). Medical students' most frequent errors at Mahidol University, Thailand. Asian EFL Journal, 9(2), 170-194.
Seaton, A. & Fergusson, R. (2010). Grammar plus. Singapore: Learners Publishing.
Selinker, L. (1974). Interlanguage. In J. Richards (Ed.), Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 31-54). Essex: Longman.
Singh, C. K. S., Singh, A. K. J., Razak, N. Q. A., & Ravinthar, T. (2017). Grammar errors made by ESL tertiary students in writing. English Language Teaching, 10(5), 16.
https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n5p16
Smith, S., & Wang, S. (2013). Reading and grammar learning through mobile phones. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 117-134.
Sovakandan, H., Jaganathan, P., & Husain, F. M. (2018). Investigating low proficiency ESL students' perception of the use of i-Think Maps in writing practices. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 14(2), 1-13.
Subramaniam, R., & Khan, M. H. (2016). Explicit grammar instruction in communicative language teaching: A study of the use of quantifiers. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 9(1), 43-73.
Vahdatinejad, S. (2008). Students' error analysis and attitude towards teacher feedback using a selected software: A case study. Unpublished Master Thesis, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Vásquez, L. D. A. (2008). Error analysis in a written composition. Profile, 10(1), 135-146.
Watcharapunyawong, S., & Usaha, S. (2012). Thai EFL students' writing errors in different text types: The interference of the first language. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 67-78.
https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n1p67
Zarzycka-Piskorz, E. (2016). Kahoot it or not? Can games be motivating in learning grammar?. Teaching English with Technology, 16(3), 17-36.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
