THE ROLE OF INNOVATION IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FDI AND INCOME INEQUALITY: EVIDENCE FROM A TRANSITION ECONOMY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.9566.2025Keywords:
System generalized method of moments (GMM), foreign direct investment (FDI), innovation, income inequality, VietnamAbstract
This study explores the impact of innovation and foreign direct investment (FDI) on income inequality, emphasizing the moderating role of innovation in the relationship between FDI and income inequality, using panel data from 63 Vietnamese provinces from 2005 to 2020. As economic expansion raises concerns about income inequality in Vietnam, understanding the distributional effects of innovation and FDI is essential. While innovation fosters technological progress and job creation, its benefits primarily accrue to skilled labor and capital-intensive sectors, potentially widening income inequality. Similarly, FDI promotes economic expansion, but its effects on inequality depend on absorptive capacity and investment composition, which may exacerbate income gaps. Using the system generalized method of moments (GMM) method on 1,008 observations, the findings reveal a U-shaped relationship between innovation and income inequality, whereas FDI exhibits an inverted U-shaped relationship. Specifically, innovation exacerbates inequality beyond a threshold of 27.63, while FDI reduces inequality once it exceeds 0.76. Moreover, the negative coefficient of the interaction variable between innovation and FDI suggests that innovation weakens the impact of FDI on income inequality. These findings remain robust when substituting the Human Development Index as an inequality proxy and align with modernization and endogenous growth theories. This study contributes novel empirical insights and policy implications for promoting inclusive innovation and sustainable investment, advancing Sustainable Development Goal 10 on inequality reduction.
References
Adrián Risso, W., & Sánchez Carrera, E. J. (2019). On the impact of innovation and inequality in economic growth. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 28(1), 64-81.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2018.1429534
Aghion, P., Akcigit, U., & Howitt, P. (2015). The Schumpeterian growth paradigm. Annual Review of Economics, 7(1), 557-575.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115412
Anderson, T. W., & Hsiao, C. (1982). Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 18(1), 47-82.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(82)90095-1
Antonelli, C., & Gehringer, A. (2017). Technological change, rent and income inequalities: A Schumpeterian approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 115, 85-98.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.023
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specifcation for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297. Baffour Gyau, E., Li, Y., & Appiah, M. (2025). Global digital transformation: discovering the impact of digitalization on income inequality in OECD countries, the moderating role of globalization. Economic Change and Restructuring, 58(1), 6. Bloom, N., Van Reenen, J., & Williams, H. (2019). A toolkit of policies to promote innovation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(3), 163-184.
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
Biurrun, A. (2022). New evidence toward solving the puzzle of innovation and inequality. The role of institutions. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 31(8), 729-750. Cao, H. M. (2019). Institutional quality and foreign direct investment inflows: The case of Vietnam. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 9(5), 630-641.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2020.1853659
Cetin, M., Demir, H., & Saygin, S. (2021). Financial development, technological innovation and income inequality: Time series evidence from Turkey. Social Indicators Research, 156(1), 47-69. Ciriaci, D., Moncada-Paternò-Castello, P., & Voigt, P. (2016). Innovation and job creation: a sustainable relation? Eurasian Business Review, 6, 189-213. Do, Q. A., Do, A. D., Doan, M. H., Le, Q. H., Le, A. D., & Nguyen, T. T. D. (2024). Spatial effects of foreign direct investment on wage inequality in Vietnam. Cogent Economics & Finance, 12(1), 2293297. Duong, K. D., Huynh, T. N., Van Nguyen, D., & Le, H. T. P. (2022). How innovation and ownership concentration affect the financial sustainability of energy enterprises: evidence from a transition economy. Heliyon, 8(9), e10474.
Gossel, S. (2024). FDI and inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa: Does democracy matter? International Journal of Emerging Markets, 19(1), 33-55.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-03-2021-0321
Girling, R. (1973). Dependency and persistent income inequality. Structures of Dependency, 83-101. Hoang, D. T., Do, A. D., & Trinh, M. V. (2021). Spillover effects of FDI on technology innovation of vietnamese enterprises. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 655-663. Hoang, T. K., & Le, Q. H. (2024). The impact of technical change on income inequality in Vietnam. Journal of Economics and Development, 26(4), 329-345.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-03-2024-0087
Huynh, C. M. (2021). Foreign direct investment and income inequality: Does institutional quality matter? The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 30(8), 1231-1243.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2021.1942164
Kaulihowa, T., & Adjasi, C. (2018). FDI and income inequality in Africa. Oxford Development Studies, 46(2), 250-265.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2017.1381233
Khan, I., & Nawaz, Z. (2019). Trade, FDI and income inequality: empirical evidence from CIS. International Journal of Development Issues, 18(1), 88-108.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDI-07-2018-0107
Law, S. H., Naseem, N. A. M., Lau, W. T., & Trinugroho, I. (2020). Can innovation improve income inequality? Evidence from panel data. Economic Systems, 44(4), 100815.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100815
Le, Q. H., Do, Q. A., Pham, H. C., & Nguyen, T. D. (2021). The impact of foreign direct investment on income inequality in Vietnam. Economies, 9(1), 27.
https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9010027
Lee, C. C., Lee, C. C., & Cheng, C. Y. (2022). The impact of FDI on income inequality: Evidence from the perspective of financial development. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(1), 137-157.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2143
Lewandowska, A. (2021). Interactions between investments in innovation and SME competitiveness in the peripheral regions. Journal of International Studies, 14(1), 285-307.
https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2021/14-1/20
Liu, Q., & Lawell, C. Y. C. L. (2015). The effects of innovation on income inequality in China. Shandong Province Educational Department.
McLaren, J., & Yoo, M. (2017). FDI and inequality in Vietnam: An approach with census data. Journal of Asian Economics, 48, 134-147. Minh Ho, Chi, Thai-Thuong Le, Quan., The Vo, Anh., Hong Vo, Duc., & Thi-Thieu Ha, Dao. (2020). Does government spending on education affect provincial income inequality in Vietnam? The Singapore Economic Review, 66(04), 1105-1123.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2016.11.002
Napolitano, L., Sbardella, A., Consoli, D., Barbieri, N., & Perruchas, F. (2022). Green innovation and income inequality: A complex system analysis. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 63, 224-240.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.09.007
Nguyen, C. P., & Su, T. D. (2022). Export dynamics and income inequality: New evidence on export quality. Social Indicators Research, 163(3), 1063-1113.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-02935-4
Nguyen, H. T., Le, A. N. N., Le, H. V., & Duong, K. D. (2024). Foreign direct investment and employments in Asia Pacific nations: The moderating role of labor quality. Heliyon, 10(9), e30133. Nguyen, P. H., Tran, L. C., Nguyen, H. B. D., Ho, T. P. T., Duong, Q. A., & Tran, T. N. (2023). Unlocking the potential of open innovation through understanding the interrelationship among key determinants of FDI attractiveness. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(1), 100021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100021
Nguyen, V. B. (2021). The difference in the FDI inflows-Income inequality relationship between developed and developing countries. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 30(8), 1123-1137.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2021.1925331
Nguyen, V. B. (2023). The role of digitalization in the FDI-income inequality relationship in developed and developing countries. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 28(55), 6-26.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-09-2021-0189
Ofori, I. K., Dossou, M. A., Asongu, S. A., & Armah, M. K. (2023). Bridging Africa's income inequality gap: How relevant is China's outward FDI to Africa? Economic Systems, 47(1), 101055.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2022.101055
Ongo, E. B. N., Bitoto, F. E., Ondoua, B. B., & Mbognou, C. N. (2024). Does Innovation Drive Up Income Inequality in Africa? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(1), 16264-16290. Pan-Long, T. (1995). Foreign direct investment and income inequality: Further evidence. World Development, 23(3), 469-483.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00136-Z
Permana, M., Lantu, D., & Suharto, Y. (2018). The effect of innovation and technological specialization on income inequality. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(4), 51-63.
https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(4).2018.05
Razzaq, A., An, H., & Delpachitra, S. (2021). Does technology gap increase FDI spillovers on productivity growth? Evidence from Chinese outward FDI in Belt and Road host countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121050.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121050
Rezk, H., Amer, G., Fathi, N., & Sun, S. (2022). The impact of FDI on income inequality in Egypt. Economic Change and Restructuring, 55(3), 2011-2030. Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86-136.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-021-09375-z
Rostow, W. W. (1959). The stages of economic growth. The Economic History Review, 12(1), 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.1959.tb01829.x
Soto, G., Jardon, C. M., & Martinez-Cobas, X. (2024). FDI and income inequality in tax-haven countries: The relevance of tax pressure. Economic Systems, 48(1), 101172. Stoian, C., & Filippaios, F. (2008). Dunning's eclectic paradigm: A holistic, yet context specific framework for analysing the determinants of outward FDI: Evidence from international Greek investments. International Business Review, 17(3), 349-367.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101172
Suhrab, M., Chen, P., & Ullah, A. (2024). Digital financial inclusion and income inequality nexus: can technology innovation and infrastructure development help in achieving sustainable development goals? Technology in Society, 76, 102411.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102411
Teixeira, A. A., & Loureiro, A. S. (2019). FDI, income inequality and poverty: a time series analysis of Portugal, 1973-2016. Portuguese Economic Journal, 18(3), 203-249.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-018-00152-x
Tran, O. K. T., Mai, D. B., Chu, T. T. T., & Van Nguyen, D. (2023). Do FDI and Institutional Quality Affect the Economic Growth of Local Governments across Vietnam? Insights from Bayesian Modelling. SciPap, 31(2), 1689. Van Le, D., & Tran, T. Q. (2022). Does the private sector increase inequality? Evidence from a transitional country. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 62, 451-466.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.06.005
Wang, E. Z., & Lee, C. C. (2023). Foreign direct investment, income inequality and country risk. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 28(3), 2415-2435. Xu, C., Han, M., Dossou, T. A. M., & Bekun, F. V. (2021). Trade openness, FDI, and income inequality: Evidence from sub‐Saharan Africa. African Development Review, 33(1), 193-203.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2542
Yuldashev, M., Khalikov, U., Nasriddinov, F., Ismailova, N., Kuldasheva, Z., & Ahmad, M. (2023). Impact of foreign direct investment on income inequality: Evidence from selected Asian economies. Plos one, 18(2), e0281870.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281870
Zhang, J. (2023). The nonlinear effects of tourism on rural income inequality and urban-rural income inequality: Evidence from China. Tourism Economics, 29(1), 172-193.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 UNIMAS Publisher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
