ASSESSING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ PURCHASE INTENTION TOWARD THE ECO-FRIENDLY STATIONERY: THE MODERATION ROLE OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.9560.2025Keywords:
Purchase Intention, Eco-Friendly Stationery, Environmental ConcernAbstract
Sustainable products like eco-friendly stationery have gained much attention recently due to the increasing awareness and consciousness of consumers towards environmental issues. Numerous sustainable products have been studied in the literature but very limited studies have primarily concentrated on eco-friendly stationery from the perspective of university students. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the factors that affect Malaysian university students’ purchase intention (PI) towards eco-friendly stationery. Two environmental factors (perceived environmental responsibility (PER) and environmental knowledge (EK)) have been incorporated into the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) model together with environmental concern (EC) proposed as a moderator to develop this study’s research model. In this study, 261 usable responses were gathered via purposive sampling. This study utilised the partial least square-structural equation modelling to validate the proposed hypotheses. The result first showed that attitude (ATT), subjective norms (SN), and PER played significant roles in affecting students’ PI towards eco-friendly stationery. Additionally, the moderation analysis further revealed that the influence of SN on PI is significantly strengthened by EC. These findings signified that the students’ PI is directly impacted by ATT, SN and PER only, while the greater EC tends to further enhance the effect of SN on PI. This study’s findings firstly enrich the literature by offering new evidence on the students’ sustainable behaviour, especially in eco-friendly stationery. Besides, the moderating effect of EC on sustainable behaviour is also proven in this study. Moreover, numerous practical implications have also been resulting from this study and it’s useful for the stakeholders to cultivate the students’ sustainable behaviour.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Armutcu, B., Ramadani, V., Zeqiri, J., & Dana, L-P. (2024). The role of social media in consumers' intentions to buy green food: evidence from Turkiye. British Food Journal, 126(5), 1923-1940.
https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-11-2022-0988
Armutcu, B., Zuferi, R., & Tan, A. (2023). Green product consumption behaviour, green economic growth and sustainable development: unveiling the main determinants. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 18(4), 798-819.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-05-2023-0074
Bagozzi, R. R., Yi, Y., & Philipps, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421-458. Bhutto, M. H., Tariq, B., Azhar, S., Ahmed, K., Khuwaja, F. M., & Han, H. (2022). Predicting consumer purchase intention toward hybrid vehicles: testing the moderating role of price sensitivity. European Business Review, 34(1), 62-84.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2393203
Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural Equation Modelling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600219
Canio, F. D., Martinelli, E., & Endrighi, E. (2021). Enhancing consumers' pro-environmental purchase intentions: the moderating role of environmental concern. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 49(9), 1312-1329.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-08-2020-0301
Chanda, R. C., Vafaei-Zadeh, A., Hanifah, H., & Thurasamy, R. (2023). Modeling eco-friendly house purchasing intention: a combined study of PLS-SEM and faQCA approaches. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 18(1), 123-157.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-04-2023-0059
Channa, N. A., Tariq, B., Samo, A. H., Ghumro, N. H., & Qureshi, N.A. (2022). Predicting consumers' intentions to purchase eco-friendly athletic wear in a moderated model of individual green values and gender. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 23(2), 410-436.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSMS-12-2020-0215
Cohen, E. (1988). Authenticity and commoditisation in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 15(2), 371-386.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(88)90028-X
Duong, C. D. (2022). Big five personality traits and green consumption: bridging the attitude-intention-behavior gap. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34(6), 1123-1144.
https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-04-2021-0276
Duong, C. D., Doan, X. H., Vu, D.M., Ha, N. T., & Dam, K. V. (2022). The role of perceived environmental responsibility and environmental concern on shaping green purchase intention. Vision, 1-15.
Dwivedi, R. K., Pandey, M., Vashisht, A., Pandey, D. K., & Kumar, D. (2022). Assessing behavioral intention toward green hotels during COVID-19 pandemic: the moderating role of environmental concern. Journal of Tourism Futures, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-05-2021-0116
Farzin, M., Shababi, H., Shirchi Sasi. G., Sadeghi, M., & Makvandi, R. (2023). The determinants of eco-fashion purchase intention and willingness to pay. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 27(3), 348-366.
https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-07-2022-0158
Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4, 1-70.
https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407
George, H. J., Susainathan, S., & Parayitam, S. (2023). The relationship between green packaging awareness, initiatives, and behavior: an exploratory study on India rural population. RAUSP Management Journal, 58(4), 286-317.
https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-11-2022-0240
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hamzah, M. I., & Tanwir, N. S. (2021). Do pro-environmental factors lead to purchase intention of hybrid vehicles? The moderating effects of environmental knowledge. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123643.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123643
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Irfany, M. I., Khairunnisa, Y., & Tieman, M. (2024). Factors influencing Muslim Generation Z consumers' purchase intention of environmentally friendly halal cosmetic products. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 15(1), 221-243. Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-07-2022-0202
Kumar, A., & Basu, R. (2023). Do eco-labels trigger green product purchase intention among emerging market consumers? Journal of Indian Business Research, 15(3), 466-492.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-09-2022-0248
Kumar, R. (2024). To save the environment is my moral duty: investigating young consumer's green purchase behaviour with moderated mediation approach. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(8), 1508-1534.
https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-02-2023-0066
Ling, L-S., Yi, S., Lee, K. Y. M., Ling, P-S., & Edwin, A. M. A. (2024b). Do environmental-related factors stimulate consumers' green cosmetic purchase intention? International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 19(7), 2605-2614.
https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.190717
Ling, P-S., Chin, C-H., Yi, J., & Wong, W. P. M. (2024a). Green consumption behaviour among Generation Z college students in China: the moderating role of government support. Young Consumers, 25(4), 507-527.
https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-01-2022-1443
Ling, P-S., Ling, L. S., Wasali, S. D. (2024c). Investing in socially responsible investment (SRI): The role of responsibility, consciousness and literacy. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 19(2), 95-108.
https://doi.org/10.46754/jssm.2024.02.005
Ling, P-S., Wong, L-J., Mohmed@Wasli, S. M., & Bajat, C. D.a. (2023). Sorry COVID-19! You don't moderate my intention to purchase functional foods. Malaysian Journal of Consumer and Family Economics, 30(1), 330-354.
https://doi.org/10.60016/majcafe.v30.13
Liu, M. T., Liu, Y., & Mo, Z. (2020). An extension of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) on Chinese consumers' green purchase intention. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(8), 1823-1841.
https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-05-2019-0285
Memon, M. A., Ting, F., Cheah, J-H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Sample size for survey research: review and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), 1-20.
https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.4(2)01
Minbashrazgah, M. M., Maleki, F., & Torabi, M. (2017). Green chicken purchase behavior: the moderating role of price transparency. Management of Environmental Quality, 28(6), 902-916.
https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2016-0093
Moshood, T. D., Nawanir, G., Mahmud, F., Ahmad, M. H. B., Mohamd, F., & AbdulGhani, A. (2023). The plastic of the future: determinants for switching intention from synthetic to biodegradable plastics among the young consumers. Journal of Social Marketing, 13(1), 121-148.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-05-2022-0097
Nekmahmud, M., Ramkissoon, H., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2022). Green purchase and sustainable consumption: A comparative study between European and non-European tourists. Tourism Management Perspectives, 43, 100980.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2022.100980
Pandita, D., Bhatt, V., Kumar, V. V. R., Fatma, A., & Vapiwala, F. (2024). Electrifying the future: analysing the determinants of electric vehicle adoption. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 18(6), 1767-1786.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-06-2023-0004
Phan, V-D-V., Huang, Y-F., & Do, M-H. (2023). Exploring the effect of cognitive factors and e-social interactions on the green purchase intention: evidence from a transitional economy. Young Consumers, 24(6), 767-785.
https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-11-2022-1629
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Precedence Research. (2024). Sustainable Materials Market Size Share, and Trends 2024 to 2034. Retrieved January 17, 2025, from https://www.precedenceresearch.com/sustainable-materials-market#:~:text=The%20global%20sustainable%20materials%20market%20size%20is%20worth%20around%20USD,forecast%20period%202024%20to%202034
Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Khan, K. A. (2023). Factoring influencing green purchase behavior among millennials: the moderating role of religious values. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(6), 1417-1437.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-06-2020-0174
Rashid, I., & Lone, A. H. (2023). Organic food purchases: does green trust play a part? Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 16(4), 914-939. Shimul, A. S., & Cheah, I. (2023). Consumers' preference for eco-friendly packaged products: pride vs guilt appeal. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 41(2), 186-198.
https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-05-2022-0197
Singh, S., Sharma, P., Garg, N., & Bala, R. (2022). Groping environmental sensitivity as an antecedent of environmental behavioural intentions through perceived environmental responsibility. Journal of Enterprising Communities People and Places in the Global Economy, 16(2), 299-319.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-09-2020-0169
Sinha, R., & Annamdevula, S. (2023). Is scepticism a barrier to green purchase behaviour? Testing a comprehensive model in the Indian context. Society and Business Review, 18(4), 668-690.
https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-09-2022-0251
Suhartanto, D., Mohd Suki, N., Najib, M., Suhaeni, T., & Kania, R. (2023). Young Muslim consumers' attitude towards green plastic products: the role of environmental concern, knowledge of the environment and religiosity. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(12), 3168-3185.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-08-2021-0277
Sun, Y., Li, T., & Wang, S. (2022). "I buy green products for my benefits or yours": understanding consumers' intention to purchase green products. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34(8), 1721-1739.
https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-04-2021-0244
Synodinos, C., Moraes, G. H. S. M.d., & Prado, N. B.d. (2023). Green food purchasing behaviour: a multi-method approach of Generation Y in a developing country. British Food Journal, 125(9), 3234-3248.
https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2022-0769
Tan, L. L. (2023). Understanding consumers' preferences for green hotels - the roles of perceived green benefits and environmental knowledge. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 6(3), 1309-1327.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-01-2022-0038
Tan, W-L., & Goh, Y-N. (2018). The role of psychological factors in influencing consumer purchase intention towards green residential building. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 11(5), 788-807.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-11-2017-0097
Virtue Market Research. (2023). Green Stationery Market Size (2024 - 2030). Retrieved January 17, 2025, from https://virtuemarketresearch.com/report/green-eco-friendly-stationery-market
Wu, Y., Tian, X., Li, X., Yuan, H., & Liu, G. (2019). Characteristics, influencing factors, and environmental effects of plate waste at university canteens in Beijing, China. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 149, 151-159.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.022
Zaidan, H., Shishan, F., Al-Hasan, M., Al-Mawali, H., Mowafi, O., & Dahiyat, S. E. (2025). Cash or cash-less? Exploring the determinants of continuous intention to use e-wallets: the moderating role of environmental knowledge. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 35(2), 319-346.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 UNIMAS Publisher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
