MARKETING BOYCOTT MODEL IN INDONESIA: A STUDY USING SOCIAL IDENTITY AND PLANNED BEHAVIOR THEORIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.9559.2025Keywords:
social-identity expressiveness, self-identity expressiveness, marketing boycott, Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), Social Identity Theory (SIT)Abstract
This study examines the role of self-identity expressiveness and social-identity expressiveness in marketing boycotts of products perceived to be affiliated with Israel in Indonesia. An extended model of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), incorporating identity and social influences, is developed and tested. The study utilizes a sample of 571 individuals from Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, and Bekasi, selected through purposive sampling. Data analysis is conducted using structural equation modeling (SEM) with IBM SPSS AMOS software. The findings confirm that self-identity expressiveness and social-identity expressiveness significantly influence behavioral intentions. Additionally, the study explores the relationship between self-identity expressiveness and attitudes, as well as between social-identity expressiveness and subjective norms. The results indicate that subjective norms alone are sufficient to capture the broader range of identity and social influences shaping boycott intentions. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed, offering insights for marketing practitioners and scholars.
References
Aaker, J. L. (1999). The Malleable Self: The Role of Self-Expression in Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 91-104. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3151914 Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen, I. (2005), Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Ajzen, I. and Driver, B. L. (1992). Application of The Theory of Planned Behavior to Leisure Choice. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(3), 207-224.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1992.11969889
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European review of social psychology, 11(1), 1-33.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779943000116
Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., Lohmann, S., & Albarracín, D. (2018). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracin, D. and B. T. Johnson (Eds). The handbook of attitudes, volume 1: Basic principles, 2nd edition, Routledge, 59.
Amanda, G. (2024). Impor Barang Israel ke Indonesia Melonjak, Pengamat Menduga yang Mengatur Singapura. Republika.co.id. Retrieved August 24, 2024, from https://ekonomi.republika.co.id/berita/sfxthj423/impor-barang-israel-ke-indonesia-melonjak-pengamat-menduga-yang-mengatur-singapura
Andrykowski, M. A., Beacham, A. O., Schmidt, J. E., & Harper, F. W. (2006). Application of the theory of planned behavior to understand intentions to engage in physical and psychosocial health behaviors after cancer diagnosis. Psycho‐Oncology: Journal of the Psychological, Social and Behavioral Dimensions of Cancer, 15(9), 759-771. Aqilla, R. H., & Laidey, N. M. (2022). The effect of subjective norm, attitude, and perceived behavioral control on political consumerism in indonesia*. Science, Education and Innovation in the context of modern problems, 5(4), 335-349.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1007
Armitage, C. J. & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic Review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471-501. Arnett, J. J. (2015). Identity development from adolescence to emerging adulthood: What we know and (especially) don't know. In K. C. McLean & M. Syed (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of identity development (pp. 53-64). Oxford University Press.
Arnett, D. B., German, S. D., & Hunt, S. D. (2003). The identity salience model of relationship marketing success: The case of nonprofit marketing. Journal of marketing, 67(2), 89-105.
https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.2.89.18614
Bagozzi, R. P., Wong, N., Abe, S., and Bergami, M. (2000). Cultural and Situational Contingencies and The Theory of Reasoned Action: Application to Fast Food Restaurant Consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(2), 97-106. Bennett, R. & Savani, K. (2011). The Effect of Brand Boycotts on Brand Equity. Journal of Brand Management, 18(5), 353-372.
https://doi.org/10.1207/15327660051044187
Bhattacharya, C. B., Rao, H. & Glynn, M. A (1995). Understanding the bond of identification: An investigation of its correlates among art museum members. Journal of Marketing, 59(4), 46-57. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1252327 Biddle, B. J., Bank, B. J., & Slavings, R. L. (1987). Norms, preferences, identities and retention decisions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(4), 322-337. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786817
https://doi.org/10.2307/2786817
Byrne, B. M. (2016). Adaptation of assessment scales in cross-national research: Issues, guidelines, and caveats. International Perspectives in Psychology, 5(1), 51-65.
https://doi.org/10.1037/ipp0000042
Conner, M. & Armitage, C. J. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1429-1464.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x
Cooper, D. R. and Schindler, P. S. (2015). Business Research Methods (12th ed). New York, NY: McGraw Hill/Irwin. Cova, B., & Cova, V. (2002). Tribal Marketing: The Tribalization of Society and Its Impact on the Marketing of Goods and Services. European Journal of Marketing, 36(5/6), 596-610. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560210423023
Delistavrou, A., Krystallis, A., & Tilikidou, I. (2020). Consumers' decision to boycott "unethical" products: The role of materialism/post materialism. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 48(10), 1121-1138.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-04-2019-0126
Dolich, I. J. (1969). Congruence relationships between self images and product brands. Journal
https://doi.org/10.2307/3150001
of Marketing Research, 6(1), 80-84. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150001
https://doi.org/10.2307/3150001
Farah, M. F., & Newman, A. J. (2010). Exploring consumer boycott intelligence using a socio-cognitive approach. Journal of Business Research, 63(4), 347-355.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.03.019
Fekadu, Z., & Kraft, P. (2001). Self-iden9tity in planned behavior perspective: Past behavior and its moderating effects on self-identity-intention relations. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 29(7), 671-685.
https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2001.29.7.671
Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social Desirability Bias and The Validity of Indirect Questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 303-315.
https://doi.org/10.1086/209351
Fisher, R. J. (2000). The Future of Social Desirability Bias Research in Marketing. Psychology and Marketing, 17(2), 73-74. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200002)17:2<73::AID-MAR1>3.0.CO;2-L
Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343-373. Hair Jr, F., Gabriel, M. L., & Patel, V. K. (2014). AMOS covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM): Guidelines on its application as a marketing research tool. REMark: Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 13(2). Hogg, M. (2007). Uncertainty-Identity Theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 69-126. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(06)39002-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39002-8
Hirschman, E. C. & Holbrook, M. B. (1981). Symbolic consumer behavior, Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
Ibrahim, M. (2024). Riset Populix: 65 Persen Muslim RI Dukung Boikot Produk Terafiliasi Israel. Infobanknews.com. Retrieved August 24, 2024, from https://infobanknews.com/riset-populix-65-persen-muslim-ri-dukung-boikot-produk-terafiliasi-israel/
Iacobucci, D. (2013). Marketing models: Multivariate statistics and marketing analytics. South-Western, Cengage Learning.
Johar, J. S., & Sirgy, M. J. (1991). Value-expressive versus utilitarian advertising appeals: When and why to use which appeal. Journal of advertising, 20(3), 23-33. Kirchofer, C. (2016). Targeted killings and compellence: Lessons from the campaign against Hamas in the Second Intifada. Perspectives on Terrorism, 10(3), 16-25. Klein, J. G., Smith, N. C., & John, A. (2004). Why we boycott: Consumer motivations for boycott participation. Journal of marketing, 68(3), 92-109.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1991.10673345
Kline, R. B. (2015). The mediation myth. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(4), 202-213. Kozinets, R. V., & Handelman, J. M. (2004). Adversarial Brand Engagement: The Role of Boycotts in Brand Meaning. Advances in Consumer Research, 31, 172-178.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2015.1049349
Leung, L., & Wei, R. (1999). Who are the mobile phone have-nots? Influences and consequences. New Media & Society, 1(2), 209-226.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614449922225564
Lugtig, P., Mulders, G. J. L. M. L., Frerichs, R., and Greven, A. (2011). Estimating Non Response Bias and Mode Effects in A Mixed Mode Survey. International Journal of Market Research, 53(5), 669-686. Macdonald, H. (2002). Geopolitics and Middle East Conflict. Monographs, Royal Military College of Canada. Malär, L., Krohmer, H., Hoyer, W. D., & Nyffenegger, B. (2011). Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: The relative importance of the actual and the ideal self. Journal of marketing, 75(4), 35-52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41228607 Mann, A., & Batra, R. (2014). Brand Boycotts and their Influence on Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 962-979. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. 3rd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. Parker, D., Manstead, A. S. R., & Stradling, S. G. (1995). Modelling Car Use: The Role of Attitudes, Social Norms, and Perceived Behavioral Control. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 285-301.
Rachman, A. (2023). Bos Ritel: Efek Boikot Israel, Ekonomi RI Tumbuh di Bawah 5%. CNBC Indonesia. Retrieved January 25, 2025, from https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20231130082223-4-493221/bos-ritel-efek-boikot-israel-ekonomi-ri-tumbuh-di-bawah-5 Reed, A, II. (2002). Social identity as a useful perspective for self-concept-based consumer research. Psychology & Marketing, 19(3), 235-266.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10011
Reed, A, II. (2004). Activating the self-importance of consumer selves: Exploring identity salience effects on judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 286-295.
https://doi.org/10.1086/422108
Roswinanto, W., & Suwanda, S. N. (2023). Religious boycott in Indonesia: investigation of antecedents and the effect of religiosity dimensions. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(1), 174-195.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-08-2020-0246
Sarstedt, M., Hair Jr, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Becker, J. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3), 197-211. Schor, J. (1999). Do Americans Shop Too Much? Boston: HarperCollins.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003
Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. (2010), Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. 5th ed. West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons.
Sen, S., Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Morwitz, V. (2001). Withholding consumption: A social dilemma perspective on consumer boycotts. Journal of Consumer research, 28(3), 399-417.
https://doi.org/10.1086/323729
Shavitt, S. (1989). Operationalizing Functional Theories Of Attitude. In. A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Beckler & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Shavitt, S., Lowrey, T. M. & Han, S-P. (1992). Attitude functions in advertising: The interactive role of products and self-monitoring. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(4), 337-364.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(08)80059-9
Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 287-300.
https://doi.org/10.1086/208924
Sjostrom, O. & Holst, D. (2002). Validity of A Questionnaire Survey: Response Patterns in Different Subgroups and The Effect of Social Desirability. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 60(3), 136‐140. Smith, M. (2024). Attitudes to the Israel-Palestine conflict in Western Europe and the USA in 2023. today.yougov.com, available at https://today.yougov.com/international/articles/45869-attitudes-israel-palestine-conflict-western-europe, accessed on August 24, 2023 Smith, N. C., & Klein, J. G. (2006). Consumer Boycotts: The Role of Perceived Behavioral Control. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(3), 239-248.
https://doi.org/10.1080/000163502753740133
Solomon, M. R. (1983). The role of products as social stimuli: A symbolic interactionism perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(3), 319-329. Sparks, P., & Guthrie, C. A. (1998). Self-identity and the theory of planned behavior: A useful addition or an unhelpful artifice? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1393-1410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01683.x.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01683.x
Sparks, P. & Shepherd, R. (1992). Self-identity and the theory of planned behaviour: Assessing the role of identification with "green consumerism", Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(4), 388-399.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2786955
Steenkamp, J. B. E. M., De Jong, M. G. & Baumgrtner, H. (2010). Socially Desirable Response Tendencies in Survey Research. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 199-214.
https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.2.199
Stets, J. E. & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224-237.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2695870
Stryker, S. (1968). Identity salience and role performance: The relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage & Family, 30(4).
https://doi.org/10.2307/349494
Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Cummings Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284-297.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2695840
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social science information, 13(2), 65-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300204.
https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300204
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey: Brooks-Cole.
Terry, D. J. and Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group Norms and The Attitude Behavior Relationship: A Role for Group Identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(8), 776-793.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296228002
Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A. & White, M. A. (1999). The theory of planned behavior: Self-identity, social identity, and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(3), 225-244.
https://doi.org/10.1348/014466699164149
Theodorakis, Y. (1994). Planned behavior, attitude strength, role identity, and the prediction of exercise behavior. The Sport Psychologist, 8(2), 149-165.
https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.8.2.149
Thoits, P. A. & Virshup, L. K. (1997). Me's and we's: Forms and functions of social identity. In R. Ashmore & L. Jussim. (Eds.). Self and identity: Fundamental issues. New York: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195098266.003.0005
Thompson, K. E., Haziris, N., and Alekos, P. J. (1994). Attitudes and Food Choice Behaviour. British Food Journal, 96(11), 9-13.
https://doi.org/10.1108/00070709410074632
Thorbjørnsen, H., Pedersen, P. E., & Nysveen, H. (2007). "This is who I am": Identity expressiveness and the theory of planned behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 24(9), 763-785.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20183
Tirto Creative Lab. (2024). Dampak boikot tidak terarah bagi perekonomian Indonesia: Aksi boikot terhadap produk yang dianggap pro-Israel gencar berlangsung setahun terakhir. Bagaimana dampak gerakan boikot ini pada perekonomian nasional? Tirto.id. Retrieved January 25, 2025, from https://tirto.id/dampak-boikot-tidak-terarah-bagi-perekonomian-indonesia-g6tp
Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism‐collectivism and personality. Journal of personality, 69(6), 907-924. Tynan, C. & McKechnie, S. (2009). Co-creating Value: The Role of Self-Identity in Consumer Behavior. Journal of Business Research, 62(3), 260-267. van der Linden, M. (2015). "The Role of Social Identity in Consumer Boycotts." Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(3), 413-423.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696169
Vanlandingham, M. J., Suprasert, S., Grandjean, N., and Sittitrai, W. (1995). "Two Views of Risky Sexual Practices among Northern Thai Males: The Health Belief Model and The Theory of Reasoned Action. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36(2), 195-212.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2137225
Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. (1977). Assessing Reliability and Stability in Panel Models. Sociological Methodology, 8, 84-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/270754
https://doi.org/10.2307/270754
Yusriani, S., Patiro, S., & Utomo, K. (2024). The Role of Social Norms in Shaping Normative Beliefs and Forming Subjective Norms for Predicting Fitness Mania Intention to Consume Amino 2000 Supplements in Indonesia: A Mixed Method Approach. In 14th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management.

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 UNIMAS Publisher

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.