MARKETING BOYCOTT MODEL IN INDONESIA: A STUDY USING SOCIAL IDENTITY AND PLANNED BEHAVIOR THEORIES
Keywords:
social-identity expressiveness, self-identity expressiveness, marketing boycott, Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), Quantitative ApproachAbstract
This paper explores the role of self-identity expressiveness and social-identity expressiveness within the framework of marketing boycotts of products perceived to be affiliated with Israel in Indonesia. An extended version of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), incorporating a broader range of identity and social influences, is developed and tested. The sample size consists of 571 individuals from Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, and Bekasi. Purposive sampling was employed for data collection. The data analysis was conducted using structural equation modeling (SEM) with IBM SPSS AMOS software. As hypothesized, self-identity expressiveness and social-identity expressiveness are significant determinants of behavioral intentions. The paper also examines the relationships between self-identity expressiveness and attitude, and between social-identity expressiveness and subjective norm. The results show that the concept of subjective norm alone is sufficient to capture the broad range of identity and social influences driving behavioral intentions. Implications for marketing managers and scholars are discussed.
Keywords: social-identity expressiveness; self-identity expressiveness; marketing boycott; Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)
References
Aaker, J. L. (1999). The Malleable Self: The Role of Self-Expression in Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 91-104. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3151914
Ajzen, I. (1988), Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Ajzen, I. (2005), Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Ajzen, I. and Driver, B. L. (1992). Application of The Theory of Planned Behavior to Leisure Choice. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(3), 207-224.
Ajzen, I. and Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of Goal Directed Behavior: Attitudes, Intentions, and Perceived Behavioral Control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453-474.
Amanda, G. (2024). Impor Barang Israel ke Indonesia Melonjak, Pengamat Menduga yang Mengatur Singapura. Republika.co.id, available at : https://ekonomi.republika.co.id/berita/sfxthj423/impor-barang-israel-ke-indonesia-melonjak-pengamat-menduga-yang-mengatur-singapura, Accessed on August 24, 2024.
Armitage, C. J. & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic Review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471–501.
Bagozzi, R. P., Wong, N., Abe, S., and Bergami, M. (2000). Cultural and Situational Contingencies and The Theory of Reasoned Action: Application to Fast Food Restaurant Consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(2), 97–106.
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139–168.
Bennett, R. & Savani, K. (2011). The Effect of Brand Boycotts on Brand Equity. Journal of Brand Management, 18(5), 353-372.
Bhattacharya, C. B., Rao, H. & Glynn, M. A (1995). Understanding the bond of identification: An investigation of its correlates among art museum members. Journal of Marketing, 59, 46–57. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1252327
Bhattacharya, C. B. & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67, 76–88.
Biddle, B. J., Bank, B. J. & Slavings, R. L. (1987). Norms, preferences, identities and retention decisions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 18–29. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2786817
Conner, M. & Armitage, C. J. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1429–1464.
Cova, B., & Cova, V. (2002). Tribal Marketing: The Tribalization of Society and Its Impact on the Marketing of Goods and Services. European Journal of Marketing, 36(5/6), 596-610.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Crisp, R. J. & Turner, R. N. (2010). Essential Social Psychology: 2nd Edition. London, England: Sage
Davies, C. (2008). The Relationship between The Theory of Planned Behaviour, Past Exercise Behaviour and Intention in Individuals Diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes. Studies in Learning, Evaluation Innovation and Development, 5(2), 25–32.
Dennison, C. M. & Shepherd, R. (1995). Adolescent food choice: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 8, 9–23.
Dolich, I.J. (1969) Congruence Relationships between Self Images and Product Brands. Journal of Marketing Research, 6, 80.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3150001
Fekadu, Z. & Kraft, P. (2001). Self-identity in planned behavior perspective: Past behavior and its moderating effects on self-identity-intention relations. Social Behavior and Personality, 29(7), 671–686.
Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fitzmaurice, J. (2005). Incorporating consumers’ motivations into the theory of reasoned action. Psychology & Marketing, 22(11), 911-929.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343-373.
Grubb, E. L. & Hupp, G. (1968). Perception of self, generalized stereotypes, and brand selection, Journal of Marketing Research, 5, 58–63.
Hair, J. F., Gabriel, M., & Patel, V. (2014). AMOS covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM): Guidelines on its application as a marketing research tool. Brazilian Journal of Marketing, 13(2).
Hirschman, E. C. & Holbrook, M. B. (1981). Symbolic consumer behavior, Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. Taylor & Frances/Routledge.
Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J. & White, K. M. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4), 255–269.
Ibrahim, M (2024). Riset Populix: 65 Persen Muslim RI Dukung Boikot Produk Terafiliasi Israel. Infobanknews.com, available at : https://infobanknews.com/riset-populix-65-persen-muslim-ri-dukung-boikot-produk-terafiliasi-israel/, Accessed on August 24, 2024.
Iacobucci, D. (2013). Marketing Management. 3rd ed. Cengage Learning.
Jing, B.E. R. (2009). The Determinants for Chinese Consumers’ Intention to Use Soy Based Dietary Supplements: An Application of The Theory of Planned Behavior. Thesis, College of Education and Human Ecology Graduate Program, The Ohio State University.
Johar, J. S., & Sirgy, M. J. (1991). Value-expressive versus utilitarian advertising appeals: When and why to use which appeal. Journal of advertising, 20(3), 23-33.
Kirchofer, C. (2016). Targeted killings and compellence: Lessons from the campaign against Hamas in the Second Intifada. Perspectives on Terrorism, 10(3), 16-25.
Klein, J. G., Smith, N. C., & John, A. (2004). Why we boycott: Consumer motivations for boycott participation. Journal of marketing, 68(3), 92-109.
Kozinets, R. V., & Handelman, J. M. (2004). Adversarial Brand Engagement: The Role of Boycotts in Brand Meaning. Advances in Consumer Research, 31, 172-178.
Macdonald, H. (2002). Geopolitics and Middle East Conflict. Monographs, Royal Military College of Canada.
Malär, L., Krohmer, H., Hoyer, W. D., & Nyffenegger, B. (2011). Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: The relative importance of the actual and the ideal self. Journal of marketing, 75(4), 35-52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41228607
Mann, A., & Batra, R. (2014). Brand Boycotts and their Influence on Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 962-979.
Mannetti L., Pierro A., & Livi S. (2002). Explaining consumer conduct: From planned to self-expressive behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1431–1451.
Marcus, H. (1980). The self in thought and memory. In D. M. Wegner & R. R. Vallacher (Eds.), The Self in Social Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martinasek, M.P (2011). Understanding The Psychosocial Aspects of Waterpipe Smoking Among College Students. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Community and Family Health, University of South Florida.
Mittal, B. (1994). A study of the concept of affective choice mode for consumer decisions. Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 256–263
Parker, D., Manstead, A. S. R., & Stradling, S. G. (1995). Modelling Car Use: The Role of Attitudes, Social Norms, and Perceived Behavioral Control. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 285-301.
Reed, A, II. (2002). Social identity as a useful perspective for self-concept-based consumer research. Psychology & Marketing, 19(3), 235-266.
Reed, A, II. (2004). Activating the self-importance of consumer selves: Exploring identity salience effects on judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 286–295.
Richins, M. L. (1994). Special possessions and the expression of material values. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 522–533.
Rosenberg, M. (1981). The self-concept: Social product and social force. In M. Rosenberg & R. H. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 593–624). New York: Basic Books
Schor, J. (1999). Do Americans Shop Too Much? Boston: HarperCollins.
Shavitt, S. (1989). Operationalizing functional theories of attitude. In. A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Beckler & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Shavitt, S., Lowrey, T. M. & Han, S-P. (1992). Attitude functions in advertising: The interactive role of products and self-monitoring. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(4), 337–364.
Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 287–300.
Smith, M. (2024). Attitudes to the Israel-Palestine conflict in Western Europe and the USA in 2023. today.yougov.com, available at https://today.yougov.com/international/articles/45869-attitudes-israel-palestine-conflict-western-europe, accessed on August 24, 2023
Smith, N. C., & Klein, J. G. (2006). Consumer Boycotts: The Role of Perceived Behavioral Control. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(3), 239-248.
Solomon, M. R. (1983). The role of products as social stimuli: A symbolic interactionism perspective. Journal of Consumer research, 10(3), 319-329.
Sparks, P. & Guthrie C. A. (1998). Self-identity and the theory of planned behavior: A useful addition or an unhelpful artifice? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1393–1410.
Sparks, P. & Shepherd, R. (1992). Self-identity and the theory of planned behaviour: Assessing the role of identification with “green consumerism”, Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 388–399.
Stets, J. E. & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 224–337.
Stryker, S. (1968). Identity salience & role performance. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 4, 558–564.
Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Cummings.
Tajfel, H. (1974). Social Identity and Intergroup Behavior. Social Science Information, 13, 65–93.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.). Psychology of Intergroup Relations* (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey: Brooks-Cole.
Terry, D. J. and Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group Norms and The Attitude Behavior Relationship: A Role for Group Identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(8), 776-793.
Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A. & White, M. A. (1999). The theory of planned behavior: Self-identity, social identity, and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(3), 225–244.
Theodorakis, Y. (1994). Planned behavior, attitude strength, role identity, and the prediction of exercise behavior. The Sport Psychologist, 8, 149–165.
Thompson, K. E., Haziris, N., and Alekos, P. J. (1994). Attitudes and Food Choice Behaviour. British Food Journal, 96(11), 9-13.
Thompson, N. J. and Thompson, K. E. (1996), ”Reasoned Action Theory: An Application to Alcohol Free Beer. Journal of Marketing Practice: Applied Marketing Science, 2(2), 35-48.
Thoits, P. A. & Virshup, L. K. (1997). Me’s and we’s: Forms and functions of social identity. In R. Ashmore & L. Jussim. (Eds.). Self and identity: Fundamental issues. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tynan, C. & McKechnie, S. (2009). Co-creating Value: The Role of Self-Identity in Consumer Behavior. Journal of Business Research, 62(3), 260-267.
van der Linden, M. (2015). "The Role of Social Identity in Consumer Boycotts." Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(3), 413-423.
Vanlandingham, M. J., Suprasert, S., Grandjean, N., and Sittitrai, W. (1995), “Two Views of Risky Sexual Practices among Northern Thai Males: The Health Belief Model and The Theory of Reasoned Action. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36(2), 195-212.
Zychowicz, M. J. and Pilska, M. (2006). Psychosocial Determinants of Using Vitamin and Mineral Supplements among Students. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 15/56(2), 167-170.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 UNIMAS Publisher

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.