Exploring the Possible Influence of Women’s Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO) on Their Decision to Opt Out from Organizational Career to Self-Employment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.785.2018Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the possible influence of women’s entrepreneurial orientations (EO) on their decision to opt out from organizational careers to self-employment. It examines how women account for these transitions, reasons for opting for self-employment and experiences of self-employment. This research employs the qualitative methodology using semi-structured interviews as the main data collection tool. The study revealed that the entrepreneurial orientations of the women under study are commonly associated with the generally successful entrepreneurial behaviour of risk-taking, creative, proactive, competitive, aggressive and confidence. This suggests that enterprises and their women owners may benefit from efforts to increase their levels of entrepreneurial orientation in order to survive the dynamic, fast-paced and complex business environment characterized by shorter life cycles, globalization, and continuous improvements in technology. Hence for the women under study with higher entrepreneurial orientation levels, their transitions from their organizational career to self-employment or small business ownership are seen as attractive career moves.
Keywords: Women’s careers, entrepreneurial orientation, opting out
References
Ahl, H. (2004). The scientific reproduction of gender inequality: A discourse analysis of research texts on women's entrepreneurship. Liber.
Ahl, H. (2006). Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 30(5), 595-621.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00138.x
Apospori, E., Papalexandris, N., & Galanaki, E. (2005). Entrepreneurial and professional CEOs: Differences in motive and responsibility profile. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(2), 141-162.
https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730510582572
Benz, M., & Frey, B. S. (2008). Being independent is a great thing: Subjective evaluations of self‐employment and hierarchy. Economica, 75(298), 362-383.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00594.x
Bounds, G. (2007, July 31). Enterprise: Almond business expands it is identity to kick-start growth; revenue shoots up thanks to move to popular peanuts. Wall Street Journal, p. B10.
Bradley, H. (2007). Gender. Cambridge: Polity.
Bruni, A., Gherardi, S., & Poggio, B. (2004). Entrepreneur-mentality, gender and the study of women entrepreneurs. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(3), 256-268.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810410538315
Calas, M. B., Smircich, L., & Bourne, K. A. (2009). Extending the boundaries: Reframing "entrepreneurship as social change" through feminist perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 552-569.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.40633597
Carter, S., Shaw, E., Lam, W., & Wilson, F. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurship, and bank lending: The criteria and processes used by bank loan officers in assessing applications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 427-444.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00181.x
Choo, S., & Wong, M. (2006). Entrepreneurial intention: triggers and barriers to new venture creations in Singapore. Singapore management review, 28(2), 47.
Duberley, J., & Carrigan, M. (2013). The career identities of 'mumpreneurs': Women's experiences of combining enterprise and motherhood. International Small Business Journal, 31(6), 629-651.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242611435182
Gill, R., & Ganesh, S. (2007). Empowerment, constraint, and the entrepreneurial self: A study of white women entrepreneurs. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35(3), 268-293.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880701434265
Goffee, R., & Scase, R. (1985). Women in charge: the experiences of women entrepreneurs. London: Allen & Irwin.
Halal, W. E. (1996). The rise of the knowledge entrepreneur. The Futurist, 30(6), 13.
Heckscher, C. C. (1996). White-collar blues: Management loyalties in an age of corporate restructuring. Basic Books.
Jennings, J. E., & Brush, C. G. (2013). Research on women entrepreneurs: challenges to (and from) the broader entrepreneurship literature?. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 663-715.
https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2013.782190
Kolvereid, L. (1996). Prediction of employment status choice intentions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 21(1), 47-58.
https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879602100104
Kuratko, D. F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 29(5), 577-598.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00099.x
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
https://doi.org/10.2307/258632
Mallon, M., & Cohen, L. (2001). Time for a change? Women's accounts of the move from organizational careers to self‐employment. British Journal of Management, 12(3), 217-230.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00195
Marlow, S., & Carter, S. (2004). Accounting for change: Professional status, gender disadvantage and self-employment. Women in Management Review, 19(1), 5-17.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420410518395
Marlow, S., Henry, C., & Carter, S. (2009). Exploring the impact of gender upon women's business ownership: Introduction. International Small Business Journal, 27(2), 139-148.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242608100487
Marlow, S., & McAdam, M. (2013). Gender and entrepreneurship: Advancing debate and challenging myths; exploring the mystery of the under-performing female entrepreneur. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 19(1), 114-124.
https://doi.org/10.1108/13552551311299288
Marlow, S., & Swail, J. (2014). Gender, risk and finance: why can't a woman be more like a man?. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(1-2), 80-96.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2013.860484
Marshall, J. (1995). Women managers moving on: Exploring career and life choices. Thomson Learning.
Mattis, M. C. (2004). Women entrepreneurs: out from under the glass ceiling. Women in Management Review, 19(3), 154-163.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420410529861
McLeod, J. (2003). Doing counselling research. London: Sage Publication.
Melamed, T. (1995). Barriers to women's career success: Human capital, career choices, structural determinants, or simply sex discrimination. Applied psychology, 44(4), 295-314.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1995.tb01082.x
Melamed, T. (1996). Validation of a stage model of career success. Applied Psychology, 45(1), 35-65.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1996.tb00848.x
Mirchandani, K. (1999). Feminist insight on gendered work: New directions in research on women and entrepreneurship. Gender, Work & Organization, 6(4), 224-235.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00085
Morris, M. H. (1998). Entrepreneurial intensity: Sustainable advantages for individuals, organizations, and societies. Greenwood Publishing Group.
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2009). Business model generation: A Handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers: Self-published.
Pitt, L. F., & Kannemeyer, R. (2000). The role of adaptation in microenterprise development: A marketing perspective. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 137.
Savickas, M. L. (2005). The theory and practice of career construction. Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work, 1, 42-70.
Still, L. V., & Guerin, C. D. (1991). Barriers facing self-employed women: the Australian experience. Women in Management Review, 6(6).
https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000001803
Still, L. V., & Walker, E. A. (2006). The self-employed woman owner and her business: An Australian profile. Women in Management Review, 21(4), 294-310.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420610666597
Walker, E. A., & Webster, B. J. (2007). Gender, age and self-employment: some things change, some stay the same. Women in Management Review, 22(2), 122-135.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420710732088
Ferrier, W. J. (2001). Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 858-877.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3069419
Zimmerman, M. A., & Brouthers, K. D. (2012). Gender heterogeneity, entrepreneurial orientation and international diversification. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 20-43.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
4) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
5) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
