Does Talking about Emotion Help Eyewitness Memory? The Role of Emotional and Factual Retelling in Memory Accuracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.193.2016Abstract
Eyewitnesses typically talk about the traumatic events that they have experienced based on their memory. This research aimed to investigate differences between emotional and factual retelling of eyewitness in terms of memory accuracy and error. Participants watched a traumatic robbery video and were instructed to recall the events in detail. Participants were divided into three retelling conditions where they: a) discussed the robbery in a factual way, b) focused on discussing their emotional response, and c) performed unrelated tasks. Results showed that eyewitnesses who talked about their emotion recalled less detailed memories and made more errors in free recall while eyewitnesses who focused on factual detail seem to be able to maintain their memory accuracy of the event.
Keywords: eyewitness memory; emotional retelling; factual retelling; memory accuracy; memory error
References
Andolina, S., Pirrone, D., Russo, G., Sorce, S., & Gentile. A. (2012). Exploitation of mobile access to context-based information in cultural heritage fruition. In Proceedings of the 2012 Seventh International Conference on Broadband, Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications. IEEE Computer Society.
https://doi.org/10.1109/BWCCA.2012.60
Ansbacher, T. (1998). John Dewey's experience and education: Lessons for museums. Curator: The Museum Journal, 41 (1), 36-50.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.1998.tb00812.x
Bay, H., Fasel, B., & Van Gool, L. (2006). Interactive museum guide: Fast and robust recognition of museum objects. First International Workshop on Mobile Vision. Graz.
Boehner, K., Gay, G., & Larkin, C. (2005). Drawing evaluation into design for mobile computing: A case study of the Renwick Gallery's handheld education project. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 5 (3), 219-230.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-004-0107-7
Bollini, L., De Palma, R., & Nota, R. (2013). Walking into the past: design mobile app for the geo-referred and the multimodal user experience in the context of cultural heritage. In Computational Science and Its Applications-ICCSA 2013. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39646-5_35
Bowen, J. P., & Filippini-Fantoni, S. (2004). Personalization and the web from a museum perspective.
In D. Bearman and J. Trant (Eds.), International Conference on Museums and the Web. Toronto: Archives and Museum Informatics.
Brelot, M., Cotamanac'h, A. D., & Kockelkorn, H. (2005). Nomadic computing in indoor cultural settings: Intelligent connectivity, context awareness and the mobile museum experience. International Cultural Heritage Informatics Meeting(ICHIM2005). Paris: Archives & Museum Informatics Europe.
Bruns, E., Brombach, B., & Zeidler, T. (2007). Enabling mobile phones to support large-scale museum guidance. IEEE Multimedia, 14(2), 16- 25.
https://doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2007.33
Cabrera, J. S., Frutos, H. M., Stoica, A., Avouris, N., Dimitriadis, Y., & Fiotakis, G. (2005). Mystery in the museum: Collaborative learning activities using handheld devices. Mobile HCI 2005. Salzburg: ACM.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1085777.1085843
Damala, A. (2007). Merging augmented reality based features in mobile multimedia museum guides. Anticipating the Future of the Cultural Past, CIPA Conference 2007, 1-6 October 2007, (pp. 259-264).
Athens, Greece. Dierking, L. D., Luke, J. J., Foat, K. A., & Adelman, L. (2001). The family and free-choice learning. Museum News, Nov-Dec, 80(6).
Economou, M., & Meintani, E. (2011). Promising Beginnings? Evaluating museum mobile phone apps. In Proceedings Rethinking Technology in Museums Conference: Emerging Experiences. Ireland: University of Limerick.
Anderson, L., & Shimamura, A. P. (2005). Influences of emotion on context memory while viewing film clips. American Journal of Psychology,118(3), 323-337.
https://doi.org/10.2307/30039069
Bohannon, J. (2014). How reliable is eyewitness testimony? Retrieved from http://news.sciencemag.org/policy/2014/10/how-reliable-eyewitness-testimony-scientists-weigh.
Brown, R., & Kulik, J. (1977). Flashbulb memories. Cognition, 5(1), 73-99.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(77)90018-X
Core, D. (2013). Rompakan bersenjata di kedai arak pada siang hari. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZl3Zg5lMVk
Davies, G. M., & Logie, R. H. (1993). Memory in everyday life.The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Dudukovic, N. M., Dubrow, S., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Attention during memory retrieval enhances future remembering. HHS Journal, 37(7), 953-961.
https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.7.953
Edelstein, R. S., Alexander, K. W., Goodman, G. S., & Newton, J. W. (2004). Emotion and eyewitness memory. In D. Reisberg & P. Hertel (Eds.), Memory and Emotion (pp.308-346). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195158564.003.0010
Ellis, H. C., & Hunt, R.R. (1993). Fundamentals of cognitive psychology. US: Wm. C. Brown Communications, Inc.
Eysenck, H. J. (2006). The organization of personality. Journal of Personality, 20(1), 101-117.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1951.tb01515.x
Loftus, E. F., Loftus, G. R., & Messo, J. (1987). Some facts about weapon focus. Law and Human Behavior, 11(1), 55-62.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044839
Loftus, E., & Ketcham, K. (1991). Witness for the defense: The accused, the eyewitness, and the expert who puts memory on trial. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Marsh, E. J., Tversky, B., & Hutson, M. (2005). How eyewitnesses talk about events: Implications formemory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(5), 531-544.
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1095
Ochsner, K. N. (2000). Are affective events richly recollected or simply familiar? The experience and process of recognizing feelings past. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(2), 242-261.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.2.242
Rime, B. (2009). Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: Theory and empirical review. Emotion Review, 1(1), 60-85.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073908097189
Soleti, E., Curci, A., Bianco, A., & Lanciano, T. (2012). Does talking about emotions influence eyewitness memory? The role of emotional vs. factual retelling on memory accuracy. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 8(4), 632-640.
https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v8i4.526
Wells, G. (2014). Eyewitness testimony is far from perfect. Retrieved from http://m.livescience.com/48966-eyewitness-testimony-is-far-fromperfect.html
Whitaker, S. (2013). What role does emotion play in memory? Retrieved from http://astudentofpsychology. blogspot.com/2013/06/what-role-does-emotion-play-in-memory.html
Zimmermann, K. A. (2014). Memory definition & types of memory. Retrieved from http://www.livescience.com/43713-memory.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
4) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
5) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
