DISSEMINATING KNOWLEDGE THROUGH TAGS: RECOMMENDING TAGS FOR SCIENTIFIC RESOURCES

Authors

  • A. Us Saeed Institute for Knowledge Management(IWM), Know-Center Graz University of Technology, Inffeldgasse 21a, 8010 Graz
  • M.T. Afzal Institute for Information Systems and Computer Media (IICM) Graz University of Technology, Inffeldgasse 16c 8010, Graz
  • A. Latif Institute for Knowledge Management(IWM), Know-Center Graz University of Technology, Inffeldgasse 21a, 8010 Graz
  • K. Tochtermann Know-Center Graz University of Technology, Inffeldgasse 21a, 8010 Graz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33736/jita.33.2010

Keywords:

Knowledge diffusion, social bookmarking, tagging, recommendation system

Abstract

Knowledge diffusion has prime importance for generation of new knowledge. The creation of new knowledge is not possible without referring or consulting the past work. Two very important potential flows related to knowledge diffusion can be observed in the common practice of researchers. First, in scientific research knowledge diffusion estimation using citation counts is generally used to establish the value of knowledge which inflates citations. Second the researchers use cited work to search the connected and related resources. Recently the social and collaborative phenomena termed as Web 2.0 has spurred new era of knowledge and information flow on the web. Its potential for the growth and diffusion of scientific knowledge has not been well explored. The emerging social and collaborative applications, such as tagging and bookmarking, are transforming the ways scientists and researchers organize their personal and collaborative information spaces. These bookmarking and tagging applications provide open data and rich metadata resources such as tags. Past research shows that the bookmarking and tagging can be used as a supplementary indicator for measuring research popularity and knowledge diffusion. However the current work exploits author keywords of scientific publications to link these resources with relevant tags extracted from a social bookmarking application such as CiteULike. This work compares, for a focus resource, the tags extracted from CiteULike based on author keywords with their corresponding tag cloud of CiteULike. The result shows that system extends the authors keyword set with social tags providing links to rich and focused resources in CiteULike. This also enhances the serendipitous discovery of emerging concepts related to the focused resource. Such a system may enhance the discovery of related and popular resources for researchers. This dataset has been made available publicly for scientific community.

References

Anjewierden, A., de Hoog, R., Brussee, R. & Efimova, L. "Detecting knowledge flows in weblogs", in 13th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, University of Kassel, Kassel, 1-12, July 2005.

Bettencourt, L M. A., Castillo-Ch'avez,, C., Kaiser, D., Wojick, D.E. Report for the Office of Scientific and Technical Information:Population Modeling of the Emergence and Development of Scientific Fields; http://www.osti.gov/innovation/research/diffusion/epicasediscussion_lb2.pdf ; October 4, 2006

https://doi.org/10.2172/990671

Branstetter, L., "Measuring the impact of academic science on industrial innovation: the case of California's Research Universities". Columbia Business School Working Paper, 2003.

Chen, C., Maceachren, A., Tomaszewski, B., MacEachren, A., "Tracing conceptual and geospatial diffusion of knowledge", in LNCS 4564, pp.265-274, 2007.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73257-0_30

Cowan, R., Paul A. David, and Dominique Foray "The Explicit Economics of Knowledge Codification and Tacitness", in Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), pp.211-253, 2000.

https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/9.2.211

Day, M.: "Institutional Repositories and Research Assessment", Supporting Study No. 4, UKOLN, ePrints UK Project, Bath, available at: www.rdn.ac.uk/projects/eprints-uk/docs/ studies/rae/rae-study.pdf (accessed 24 April 2008).

Garfield, E. "The epidemiology of knowledge and the spread of scientific information.", Current Contents 35, pp. 5-10 , 1980

Glänzel, W., Thijs, B., "Does co-authorship inflate the share of self-citations?", Scientometrics, Volume 61, Number 3 / November, 2004.

https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000045117.13348.b1

Hotho, A., J¨aschke, R.,, Schmitz1, C., Stumme, G. "Information Reterival in Folksonomies: Search and Ranking", in LNCS 4011, pp.411-426, 2006.

https://doi.org/10.1007/11762256_31

Huang, Y.C., Hung, C.C., Hsu, J.Y.: "You Are What You Tag", in AAAI, 2008.

https://doi.org/10.12968/sece.2008.5.274

Ioannidis JPA (2008) Measuring Co-Authorship and Networking-Adjusted Scientific Impact. PLoS ONE 3(7): e2778. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002778.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002778

Kleinberg, J., "Analyzing the Scientific Literature in its online Context". Nature, in Web Focus on Access to the Literature, April, 2004

MacGarvie, M., "The determinants of international knowledge diffusion as measured by patent citations", in Econ. Lett. 87, pp. 121-126, 2005.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2004.09.011

Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, M., Davis, M., "HT06, Tagging paper, Taxonomy, Flickr, Academic article, to read", in proceeding of the 17th conference on hypertext and hypermedia, in HT, Odense, Denmark, 2006.

https://doi.org/10.1145/1149941.1149949

Maurseth, P. B., and Verspagen, B.: "Knowledge Spillovers in Europe: A Patent Citations Analysis" in. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 104, No. 4, pp. 531-545, 2002 Available at SSRN:http://ssrn.com/abstract=371854.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9442.00300

Michlmayr, E., Cayzer, S.: "Learning User Profiles from Tagging Data and Leveraging them for Personalized Information Access", in WWW Banff, Canada, 2007.

Mika, P.,:"Ontologies Are Us: A Unified Model of Social Networks and Semantics". In Proc. of 4th Intl. Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2005), 2005.

https://doi.org/10.1007/11574620_38

Park, G., Park, Y., "On the measurement of patent stock as knowledge indicators", in Technol Forecast Soc Change 73 (7), pp. 793-812, 2006.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2005.09.006

Puntschart, I. and Tochtermann, K., "Online-Communities and the "un"-importance of e-Moderators", in Proceedings of Networked Learning 2006, Lancaster (UK), April 2006

Scharnhorst, A., Wouters, P. "Web Indicators - a new Generation of S & T Indicators", in international journal of scientometrics, Informmetrics and Bibliometrics, Vol. 10, issue 1, 2006.

Sorenson, O. and Singh, J., "Science, Social Networks and Spillovers" (December 26, 2006). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=953731.

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.953731

Tsai, W. "Knowledge Transfer in Intra-Organizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance", in Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996-1004, 2001.

https://doi.org/10.2307/3069443

Us Saeed, A., Stocker, A., Hoefler, P., Tochtermann, K., "Learning with the Web 2.0: The Encyclopedia of Life", in Conference ICL2007, Villach, Austria, 2007.

Us Saeed. A, Afzal, M.T.,Latif, A., Stocker, A., Tochtermann, K., Does Tagging indicate Knowledge diffusion? An exploratory case study, In Proc. of 3rd ICCIT pp.605-610 , 2008a.

https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIT.2008.332

Us Saeed, A. Afzal, M.T. Latif, A. Tochtermann, K., Citation rank prediction based on bookmark counts: Exploratory case study of WWW"06 papers, INMIC 2008. IEEE International pp. 392 - 397, Dec. 2008b.

https://doi.org/10.1109/INMIC.2008.4777769

Wu, H., Zubair, M., Maly, K.: "Harvesting Socail Knowledge from Folksonomies", in HT, Odense Denmark, 2006.

https://doi.org/10.1145/1149941.1149962

Downloads

Published

2016-04-20

How to Cite

Us Saeed, A., Afzal, M., Latif, A., & Tochtermann, K. (2016). DISSEMINATING KNOWLEDGE THROUGH TAGS: RECOMMENDING TAGS FOR SCIENTIFIC RESOURCES. Journal of IT in Asia, 3(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.33736/jita.33.2010

Issue

Section

Articles