EDITORIAL SCOPE: GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING EDITION

  • Imtiyaz Akbar Najar Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Raudhah Ahmadi Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia
Keywords: Geotechnical earthquake engineering, soil-structure interaction, civil engineering, JCEST, Scopus

Abstract

One of the main civil engineering disciplines is currently the focus area of the Journal of Civil Engineering, Science, and Technology (JCEST): geotechnical and earthquake engineering. We are honoured to present this editorial focusing on the dynamic and evolving field of geotechnical earthquake engineering, with an emphasis on seismic soil-structure interaction (SSI). These studies offer valuable insights into novel design methodologies, materials, and analysis approaches, which are crucial for ensuring the safety and resilience of infrastructure. This editorial paper collected information from the freely-accessible SCOPUS database to identify common keywords used in published papers pertaining to geotechnical earthquake engineering from 2015 to 2023. The analysis reveals that the ‘seismic’ and ‘structure’ terms are the most frequently utilised keyword in articles related to this field. As the editors of our esteemed journal, it is our privilege to shed light on this critical area of research that plays a pivotal role in ensuring the safety and resilience of civil infrastructure subjected to seismic forces.

References

Gao, Z., Zhao, M., Du, X., & Zhao, X. (2020). Seismic soil–structure interaction analysis of structure with shallow foundation using response spectrum method. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 18(8), 3517–3543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00827-x

Billah, A. H. M. M., & Alam, M. S. (2021). Seismic fragility assessment of multi-span concrete highway bridges in british columbia considering soil–structure interaction. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 48(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2018-0667

Chen, S., Lv, H., & Zhou, G. (2022). Partitioned analysis of soil-structure interaction for Nuclear Island Buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 51(10), 2220–2247. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3661

Sigdel, L. D., Al-Qarawi, A., Leo, C. J., Liyanapathirana, S., & Hu, P. (2021). Geotechnical design practices and soil structure interaction effects of an integral bridge system: A review. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(15), 7131. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11157131

Najar, I. A., Ahmadi, R. B., Jamian, M. A. H., Hamza, H. B., Ahmad, A., & Sin, C. H. (2022). Site-Specific Ground Response Analysis using the Geotechnical Dataset in Moderate Seismicity Region. International Journal of Mechanics, 16(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.46300/9104.2022.16.5

Ahmad, B., & Najar, I. A. (2016). Comparative Seismic Analysis of EL Centro and Japan Earthquakes using Response Spectra Method. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 6(5), 1859–1864.

Ahmadi, R., Najar, I. A., Abdullahi, A. F., & Galin, T. (2021). Response spectra for moderate seismic area - application to Miri district of Sarawak, Malaysia. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 1101, p. 012020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1101/1/012020

Ahmadi, R., Akbar Najar, I., Abdullahi, A. F., Sa’don, N. M., Hamza, H., & Najar, N. A. (2020). Computational Investigation of Soil Liquefaction Susceptibility based on Standard Penetration Test Value of Miri District (Sarawak, Malaysia). International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(7), 2735–2748.

Kassem, M. M., Mohamed Nazri, F., & Noroozinejad Farsangi, E. (2019). Development of seismic vulnerability index methodology for reinforced concrete buildings based on nonlinear parametric analyses. MethodsX, 6, 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.01.006

El‐Maissi, A. M., Argyroudis, S. A., Kassem, M. M., & Mohamed Nazri, F. (2022). Development of Intrinsic Seismic Vulnerability Index (ISVI) for assessing roadway system and its assets framework. MethodsX, 9(10181), 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101818

Gao, X., Duan, P., & Duan, S. (2021). Simulated seismic response analysis of subway tunnels under complex geological conditions of obliquely incident seismic SV waves. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(11), 992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07376-w

Jeong, S. Y., Kang, T. H. K., Yoon, J. K., & Klemencic, R. (2020). Seismic performance evaluation of a tall building: Practical modeling of surrounding basement structures. Journal of Building Engineering, 31, 10142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101420

Yuan, W. H., Wang, H. C., Zhang, W., Dai, B. B., Liu, K., & Wang, Y. (2021). Particle finite element method implementation for large deformation analysis using Abaqus. Acta Geotechnica, 16(8), 2449–2462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-01124-2

Carbonari, S., Morici, M., Dezi, F., Gara, F., & Leoni, G. (2017). Soil-structure interaction effects in single bridge piers founded on inclined pile groups. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 92, 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.10.005

Emani, P. K., & Maheshwari, B. K. (2009). Dynamic impedances of pile groups with embedded caps in homogeneous elastic soils using CIFECM. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29(6), 963–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.11.003

Kwag, S., Ju, B. S., & Jung, W. (2018). Beneficial and Detrimental Effects of Soil-Structure Interaction on Probabilistic Seismic Hazard and Risk of Nuclear Power Plant. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2018, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2698319

Manna, B., & Baidya, D. K. (2010). Dynamic nonlinear response of pile foundations under vertical vibration-Theory versus experiment. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30(6), 456–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.01.002

Abell, J. A., Orbović, N., McCallen, D. B., & Jeremic, B. (2018). Earthquake soil-structure interaction of nuclear power plants, differences in response to 3-D, 3 × 1-D, and 1-D excitations. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 47(6), 1478–1495. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3026

Zhao, M., Gao, Z., Wang, L., Du, X., Huang, J., & Li, Y. (2017). Obliquely incident earthquake for soil-structure interaction in layered half space. Earthquake and Structures, 13(6), 573–588. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.6.573

Ci̇velekler, E., Okur, V. D., & Afacan, K. B. (2021). A study of the local site effects on the ground response for the city of Eskişehir, Turkey. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 80(7), 5589–5607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02285-4

Zhidong, G., Xu, Z., Mi, Z., Xiuli, D., Junjie, W., & Pengcheng, L. (2021). Efficient seismic analysis for nonlinear soil-structure interaction with a thick soil layer. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 20(3), 553–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-021-2038-3

Lou, M., Wang, H., Chen, X., & Zhai, Y. (2011). Structure-soil-structure interaction: Literature review. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 31(12), 1724–1731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.07.008

SCOPUS. (2023). Scopus database. Retrieved August 2, 2023, from https://www.scopus.com

Published
2023-09-25
How to Cite
Akbar Najar, I., & Ahmadi, R. (2023). EDITORIAL SCOPE: GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING EDITION. Journal of Civil Engineering, Science and Technology, 14(2), 78 - 82. https://doi.org/10.33736/jcest.6006.2023