ASSESSING THE PUBLIC AND EXPERTS’ PERCEPTION TOWARDS THE PROPOSED CONGESTION PRICING SCHEME IN JORDAN
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the attitudes of both the public and the experts towards the Congestion Pricing (CP) scheme by considering the case of Amman City in Jordan. A combination of qualitative and quantitative methodologies was adopted. A predesigned survey with 600 respondents was the primary source of data in addition to semi-structured comprehensive interviews conducted with knowledgeable individuals experienced in the related fields including wholesalers. The analysis of the collected data was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science SPSS IBM software together with the SPSS AMOS (Analysis of Moments Structural Equation Modeling Software) and Excel spreadsheets programs to carry out CFA, RII, descriptive statistics, and socio-economic index. The results showed that more than half of the respondents (58%) have never heard of CP. 47% of those who are aware of CP were in favor of implementing it. Greater support was given to the CP implementation during the Peak hours (55%) compared to their support of all-hour implementation (26%). The RII results revealed that CP can reduce road congestion (RII=69.8%), helps protect the environment (RII=70%), and limit recreation and shopping preferences (RII=64.7%) and this aspect could be better publicized as an effective means of maintaining social distance and reducing the risk of infection during Covid-19 pandemic. Moreover, people with greater socio-economic educational class tended to perceive a higher personal change in travel habits when CP is implemented. People’s level of acceptance of the implementation of CP was found to be affected by several meaningful factors. The CFA revealed that a more significant factor was the "potential benefits and economic revenue of implementing CP". The main causes of traffic congestion in Amman, the capital of Jordan, were identified through interviews with experts from various concerned parties which included poor public transport system and parking management, increasing car ownership, and inadequate policies to control traffic congestion. The experts advised that the CP implementation should be linked with other related strategies and be evaluated periodically. They also suggested a minimum of 3.5 years’ time framework in case of introducing the CP scheme. This period is needed for issuing new CP legislation and developing an acceptable level of public awareness of the system. Furthermore, the implementation of CP might not always seriously damage the wholesaler's own business or economic competitiveness. Based on the results of the study, recommendations for developing and implementing an effective CP system in Amman were outlined.
References
Levinson, D., Marion, B., Owen, A., & Cui, M. (2017). The City is flatter: Changing patterns of job and labor access. Cities, 60, 124–138.
Qin, X., Ke, J., Wang, X., Tang, Y., & Yang, H. (2022). Demand management for smart transportation: A review. Multimodal Transportation, 1(4), 100038.
Al- Mawajdeh, G. (2018). Urban Traffic Demand Management through Congestion Pricing (CP). University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Jadaan, K., Abudayyeh, D., & Msallam, M. (2013). Behavioural Responses to Road Pricing in Jordan. Engineering Science and Technology: An International Journal (ESTIJ), 3(3), 505–509.
De Palma, A., & Lindsey, R. (2011). Traffic congestion pricing methodologies and technologies. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 19(6), 1377–1399.
Santos, G. (2005). Urban congestion charging: a comparison between London and Singapore. Transport Reviews, 25(5), 511–534.
Conway, A., & Walton, C. M. (2009). Policy options for truck user charging. Transportation research record, 2115(1), 75–83.
Selmoune, A., Cheng, Q., Wang, L., & Liu, Z. (2020). Influencing factors in congestion pricing acceptability: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2020.
Short, J. R. (2018). Are traffic-clogged US cities ready for congestion pricing? UMBC Faculty Collection.
Börjesson, M., & Kristoffersson, I. (2015). The Gothenburg congestion charge. Effects, design and politics. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 75, 134–146.
Percoco, M. (2013). Is road pricing effective in abating pollution? Evidence from Milan. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 25, 112–118.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2017). Congestion Pricing A Primer.
Wilson, S. (2018). Review of international road pricing initiatives, previous reports and technologies for demand management purposes, Ministry of Transport.
Fageda, X., Flores-Fillol, R., & Theilen, B. (2022). Price versus quantity measures to deal with pollution and congestion in urban areas: A political economy approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 115, 102719.
Tretvik, T. (2003). Urban road pricing in Norway: Public acceptability and travel behaviour. In Acceptability of transport pricing strategies (pp. 77–92). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Regan, A. (2000). What Can a Trucker Do? ACCESS Magazine, 1(17), 20–25.
Msallam, M. (2016). Public perceiveness and potential implementation of road pricing in jordan. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.54671
Hamilton, C. J. (2011). Popular Acceptance of Congestion Charging. Transport Policy, 18(6), 836–847.
Shatanawi, M., Abdelkhalek, F., & Mészáros, F. (2020). Urban congestion charging acceptability: An international comparative study. Sustainability, 12(12), 5044.
Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Xie, L., & Zhou, H. (2018). Impact of Perceived Uncertainty on Public Acceptability of Congestion Charging: An Empirical Study in China. Sustainability, 11, 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010129
Schmöcker, J.-D., Pettersson, P., & Fujii, S. (2012). Comparative Analysis of Proximal and Distal Determinants for the Acceptance of Coercive Charging Policies in the UK and Japan. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 6, 156–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2011.570856
Holt, G. (2013). Asking questions, analysing answers: Relative importance revisited. Construction Innovation, 14. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-06-2012-0035
Hossen, M. M., Kang, S., & Kim, J. (2015). Construction schedule delay risk assessment by using combined AHP-RII methodology for an international NPP project. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2014.12.019
Brown, T. ., & Moore, M. . (2012). Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling, 361–379.
Zheng, Z., Liu, Z., Liu, C., & Shiwakoti, N. (2014). Understanding public response to a congestion charge: A random-effects ordered logit approach. Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.10.016
Abulibdeh, A. (2022). Planning for congestion pricing policies in the middle east: public acceptability and revenue distribution. Transportation Letters, 14(3), 282–297.
Börjesson, M., Eliasson, J., & Hamilton, C. (2016). Why experience changes attitudes to congestion pricing: The case of Gothenburg. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 85, 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.12.002
Vanoutrive, T., & Zijlstra, T. (2018). Who has the right to travel during peak hours? On congestion pricing and ‘desirable’ travellers. Transport Policy, 63, 98–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.12.020
Copyright (c) 2023 UNIMAS Publisher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Upon acceptance of an article, the corresponding author on behalf of all authors will be asked to complete and upload the Copyright Transfer Form (refer to Copyright Issues for more information on this) alongside the electronic proof file.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and refer the publication in the Journal.
2) For open-access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds the copyright or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subjected to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) are responsible to ensure their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. The corresponding author has obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If the submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare that the researches which they have conducted comply with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving humans or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from the Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that they have no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor(s) or UNIMAS Publisher.
